Advantages and Disadvantages of Death Penalty

In: English and Literature

Submitted By gcftberfvw
Words 1243
Pages 5
Mrs. Lalaine M. Dulanas
Math Teacher
Mrs. Lalaine M. Dulanas
Math Teacher
Jacquelyn Eya Siangco
Fourth Year- D
Jacquelyn Eya Siangco
Fourth Year- D
3rd Grading
3rd Grading

Reflection
Reflection
For me math is not really an easy subject. You need a lot of patience, focus and also courage. Some people doesn’t need to spend a lot of their time studying math because they were really good at it but in my case I realize that I was not really got at this subject so I need to double or even triple my time to understand more and to learn more.
Math also needs time to understand. You need to spend your time and also effort to get want you want because if you work hard fot it you have the chance to get what you work hard for. It was just some of the people easily gave up on this subject. There was never been a winner on those who gave up. If you want to learn you must work for it. If you want to understand do some effort.
I consider myself as a pessimistic person. I hate facing problems because I think I cannot solved it alone. I was so dependent with other persons most especially my bestfriend since my mother was gone and maybe that’s the reason why I don’t love math but now I’ve realize that life is just like a unsolved problem. You need to work for it, you need to do some efforts, you must dig deeper to get the solutions and to solved the problems.
For me math is not really an easy subject. You need a lot of patience, focus and also courage. Some people doesn’t need to spend a lot of their time studying math because they were really good at it but in my case I realize that I was not really got at this subject so I need to double or even triple my time to understand more and to learn more.
Math also needs time to understand. You need to spend your time and also effort to get want you want because if you work hard fot it you have the chance to get what you…...

Similar Documents

Death Penalty

...Abstract The essay outlines the arguments for abolishing the death penalty, also including any counter arguments that can be used for a use of the death penalty. The arguments made in this essay for death-penalty abolition are its devaluation of human life, eliminating of the possibility for revenge, its violation of human rights, as well as including the view of religious groups. This essay argues that all of these arguments address that human life cannot be taken away from a person, even if the person is a murder, simply because then the society is not being better than the murder him- or herself. I have investigated many research and scientific studies in order to back up my arguments as best as possible. Furthermore I have also investigated into the methods of death penalty, such as lethal injection. This essay views practice of capital punishment as an expression of anxiety about safety, in particular it counteracts the argument that death penalty would deter any future crime, and terrorist attacks. I also looked up numbers in order to show how costly death penalty is, in order to emphasize that there are more cheaper and less inhumane methods to sentence a murder. I also draw attention to countries that use death penalty as a way to eliminate any enemies, using it as a political weapon to silence any troublesome individuals. I suggest that every life is valuable, and that death penalty does not consider the risk of killing an innocent person, but rather emphasize......

Words: 2476 - Pages: 10

For the Death Penalty

...DEATH PENALTY ARGUMENTS: Deterrent or Revenge (Pros and Cons) INTRODUCTION What is Capital punishment? Capital punishment is the death penalty. It is used today and was used in ancient times to punish a variety of offenses. Even the bible advocates death for murder and other crimes like kidnapping and witchcraft. When the word death penalty is used, it makes yelling and screaming from both sides of extremist. One side may say deterrence, while the other side may say, but you may execute an innocent man. Today, one of the most debated issues in the Criminal Justice System is the issue of capital punishment or the death penalty. Capital punishment was legal until 1972, when the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in Furman v. Georgia stating that it violated the Eight and Fourteen Amendments citing cruel and unusual punishment. However, in 1976, the Supreme Court reversed itself with Gregg v. Georgia and reinstated the death penalty but not all states have the death penalty. Thirteen states do not have the death penalty: Alaska, District of Colombia, Hawaii, Iowa, Main, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY (CONS) Death Penalty Fails to Rehabilitate What would it accomplish to put someone on death row? The victim is already dead-you cannot bring him back. When the......

Words: 4215 - Pages: 17

Death Penalty

...The death penalty An issue that has continually created tension in today's society is whether the death penalty serves as a justified and valid form of punishment. Whenever the word "death penalty" comes up, extremists from both sides start yelling out their arguments. One side says deterrence, the other side says there's a potential of executing an innocent man; one says justice, retribution, and punishment; the other side says execution is murder. Crime is an evident part of society, and everyone is aware that something must be done about it. Most people know the threat of crime to their lives, but the question lies in the methods and action in which it should be dealt with. In several parts of the world, the death penalty has been appointed to those who have committed a variety of offenses from the time of ancient Babylon to present-day America. As history tells us, capital punishment, whose definition is "the use of death as a legally sanctioned punishment," is an acceptable and efficient means of deterring crime.(McConn) Today, the death penalty remains an effective method of punishment for murder and other crimes. There is debate over the morals and effectiveness of such a harsh sentence. Most commonly, the death penalty is challenged as a violation of the Eighth Amendment, which says that the U.S. cannot use "cruel and unusual" punishment. Due to the fact that "punishment" is a legal infliction of suffering, it must be somewhat "cruel.”(Gershowitz) ......

Words: 951 - Pages: 4

Death Penalty

...An issue that has continually created tension in today's society is whether the death penalty serves as a justified and valid form of punishment. Whenever the word "death penalty" comes up, extremists from both sides start yelling out their arguments. One side says deterrence, the other side says there's a potential of executing an innocent man; one says justice, retribution, and punishment; the other side says execution is murder. Crime is an evident part of society, and everyone is aware that something must be done about it. Most people know the threat of crime to their lives, but the question lies in the methods and action in which it should be dealt with. In several parts of the world, the death penalty has been apportioned to those who have committed a variety of offenses from the time of ancient Babylon to present-day America. The Roman Empire made use of the death penalty liberally, as did the Church of the Middle Ages. As history tells us, capital punishment, whose definition is "the use of death as a legally sanctioned punishment," is an acceptable and efficient means of deterring crime. Today, the death penalty remains an effective method of punishment for murder and other heinous crimes. There is debate over the morals and effectiveness of such a harsh sentence. Most commonly, the death penalty is challenged as a violation of the Eighth Amendment, which says that the U.S. cannot use "cruel and unusual" punishment. Due to the fact that "punishment" is......

Words: 1630 - Pages: 7

The Death Penalty

...THE DEATH PENALTY: MORALLY UNFAIR OR JUSTICE SERVED! Andrea Sturdivant ENG 325 Intermediate Composition Candace Henry Monday November 19, 2012 The Death penalty is it Justice? However it is not the Laws that cure’s the society. The death penalty is a subject that has become very big in the 21st century. However, many centuries ago the death penalty is something that was widely practiced in almost all cultures. Thirty-four states have the death penalty, not including the United States army and the United States navy where the death penalty is allowed. Sixteen states do not have the death penalty, not including Washington D.C. where the death penalty is also not allowed. The death penalty can be drawn back to the tenth century; however, in America the main reason why it is here is because of Britain’s influence. Laws regarding the death penalty traveled quickly into America and soon they were legal in every colony. The death penalty has been a part of history for a long period of time. The effectiveness of the death penalty in states where it is legal should encourage the sixteen states that do not have the death penalty re-instate it as a punishment. Innocent until proven guilty, as many people now realize that is the motto of the court systems in the United States. However, for those families that have family members being put through the process of death...An issue that has continually created tension in today’s society is whether the death penalty serves as a...

Words: 1754 - Pages: 8

The Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty The death penalty is a form of punishment in which a person who has been convicted of a serious crime is executed under the precept of the criminal justice system. The death penalty has been in existence for thousands of years and has gained wide acceptance in the United States since early colonial times. Even those who framed the Constitution specifically the Fifth Amendment approved of it though implicitly (McCord and Latzer 9). Despite the growing acceptance of the death penalty as an appropriate punishment for certain kinds of crimes such as first degree murders, there are still some people who argue against it on certain grounds. The debate as to the justification of the death penalty has raged on for a long time. On one hand, there are those who are of the opinion that the death penalty is a cruel punishment which is morally wrong and a violation of the right to life for its victims. Others defend their opposing views by citing the wave of abolition of other types of corporal punishment such as branding and flogging and propose that imprisonment should also replace the death penalty (McCord and Latzer 9). However, the death penalty has proved to be a punishment befitting certain crimes such as horrific murders as it is the ultimate punishment. It has taken many harmful elements off the streets besides acting as a deterrent for both the convicted criminals and other potential murderers out there. In essence, it has saved many innocent lives that......

Words: 2007 - Pages: 9

Death Penalty

...Marc Habbaki 9/1/2012 I.D.: 12090561 Death Penalty Is death penalty served as a justified and valid form of punishment? There are two arguments for this topic with a lot of different reasons and explanations .One says prevention, the other side says there's a potential of executing an innocent man; one says justice and punishment; the other side says execution is murder. However, c0rime is an evident part of society, and everyone is aware that something must be done about it. In several parts of the world, the death penalty has been apportioned to those who have committed a variety of felonies. The Roman Empire made use of the death penalty liberally, as did the Church of the Middle Ages. As history tells us, capital punishment is an acceptable and efficient means of deterring crime. Today, the death penalty remains an effective method of punishment for murder and other terrible crimes because it helps lower the rate of violent crimes, makes the streets safer and provides us a better environment to live in. People will rob, take advantage of others, and commit crimes as long as it is in their best interest to do so. The purpose of our entire criminal justice system is to protect the rights of life, freedom, and property for all its citizens. To be able to accomplish this, the punishment for crime must be harsh enough to deter potential criminals. Under this mindset, the death penalty makes perfect sense because it truly makes a criminal pay for his crime and......

Words: 1574 - Pages: 7

Death Penalty

...Death Penalty Mead Shumway of Nebraska was convicted of the first degree murder of his employer's wife on circumstantial evidence and sentenced to death by jury. His last words before his execution were: "I am an innocent man. May God forgive everyone who said anything against me." The next year, the victim's husband confessed on his deathbed that he [the husband] had murdered his [own] wife (Radelet, Bedau, & Putnam, 1993). There are an uncertain numerous amount of incidents similar to the one depicted above, that have repeatedly occurred throughout the course of history. Two highly distinguishable figures in the area of capital punishment in the United States, Hugo Bedau and Michael Radelet, discovered in 1992, at least 140 cases, since 1990, in which innocent persons were sentenced to death (Hook & Kahn, 1989). In Illinois alone, 12 death row inmates have been cleared and freed since 1987. The most conclusive evidence in support of this "comes from the surprisingly large numbers of people whose convictions have been overturned and who have been freed from death" (Bedau, 1997). One out of every seven people sentenced to death row are innocent (Bedau, 1997). The numbers are disturbing, innocent people are becoming victims of the United States judicial system by its overlooked imperfections. A former president of the American Bar Association (ABA), John J. Curtin Jr., said it best when he told a congressional committee that "Whatever you think about the death......

Words: 3811 - Pages: 16

The Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty Lucious Davis PHI200: Mind and Machine Instructor: Michelle Loudermilk October 10, 2011 The United States is still one of the countries that still use the death penalty as punishment for crimes. While some see it as barbaric and totally against American values, others view it as an important deterrent to violent crimes- such as murder. Regardless of which side you are on, one thing is for sure- the debate isn’t going anywhere anytime soon. Capital punishment, another name for the death penalty, has been present in the United States since 1608. This is the process by which a person a person is tried and put to death for crimes they have committed. The list of crimes that are punishable by death vary from state to state (the U.S. government and the U.S. military have their own criteria), as well as the methods used for execution. Lethal injection is the standard for execution, but there are several other methods used, including: electrocution, hanging, and death by firing squad. Although every state does not employ the death penalty- a vast majority do. Along with the District of Columbia and the U.S. government, 36 states currently have the power to execute inmates. Through the centuries there has been endless debate about the morality, legality, and constitutionality of capital punishment. For many (and for my paper’s sake) the debate is whether or not the death penalty is ethical. Specifically, is it ethical to put someone to death......

Words: 2978 - Pages: 12

Death Penalty

...No Justification for Death Penalty Death penalty or the capital punishment is a severe punishment given by the government to a criminal for offending crimes that are categorized under the capital crimes like murder. When the criminals are convicted of capital crimes and are sentenced for death penalty, the government legally takes life of the criminal by hanging them to death, lethal injection or by electrocute. Death penalty used to be performed all over the world, but many countries have outlawed it with regards to its violation of human rights and religious causes. In United States, most of the states have the authority to give death penalty to criminals. Death penalty is a very serious issue that has caused a big controversy between its supporters and opposers. People who support death penalty argues that it is the right kind of punishment for the criminals, provides justice to the victims and the families as well help deter the crime rates. But I really don’t think death penalty has any justification because there is a maximum chance for innocent people being convicted, it is also a violation of human rights as well as a religious sin to take life of people, and the crimes have not lowered due to death penalty, rather it takes a lot of tax payer’s money to execute a criminal. I rather think that such criminals should be given life imprisonment without parole. The foremost reason for abolishing the death penalty is the wrongful conviction. There are lots of cases......

Words: 1394 - Pages: 6

Death Penalty

...Alexander Dinter Instructor Pi ENC 1102 19 April, 2012 To Kill or Not: A Death Penalty Debate Capital punishment has always been a a debate involving morality, legality, and even religion. Currently 34 of the 50 states hold on to the death penalty held to few of those committing intentional murders. Many find taking life away from human being to be immoral. In the end, capital punishment has proven to be beneficial towards the general society. Due to its natural intent, the death penalty offers justice toward the victims that have been brutally murdered. The safety of the community is only improved if the threat of future murders is put to rest. While that can also be solved through life of imprisonment, it is often forgotten how tax money is used to keep the criminals alive. The death penalty solves many issues that life sentence cannot. At the current time, the death penalty is considered legal in majority states. It has started to become abolished at 1911 starting with the state of Minnesota. The most recent state to reject capital punishment is Illinois at 2011. Whether or not a convict is sentenced to death depends on the state in which the capital crime took place. Even among the states that condone the death penalty only proceed after an impeccable case against the defendant. Any reason to prove his/her innocence or motive through evidence/witnesses usually rules the death penalty out of the final hearing. Knowing this it is evident that the U.S. does not take...

Words: 1209 - Pages: 5

Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty Introduction      The death penalty is a huge controversial issue all over the world. This punishment is carried out by the country's government when a citizen of that country disobeys the law by committing an unthinkable crime, such as rape or murder. But having the death penalty has it negatives as well as the benefits to a country .In this assignment I research and discuss , the benefits as well as the negatives. Currently, there are thirty-three states in which the death penalty is legal and seventeen states that have abolished it all together . I believe the death penalty should be legal as I will now debate . There are many reasons as to why I believe the death penalty should be legalized, including deterrence, retribution, and morality; and also their are other arguments to this topic that do not show enough evidence to prove it is wrong. This  discussion is important because I feel it is a decision made within what you believe is right. I don't see why society should tolerate such people, I suppose throwing a person in prison for life works, but then again why should good citizens who go about their daily lives and pay their taxes and be responsible for supporting the life of a peadophile or murderer ? My hypothesis is the death penalty, is more beneficial than harmful. My research report will be based in the United States , as the USA still has the death penalty in many of their states. What is the Death Penalty? The death penalty,......

Words: 1251 - Pages: 6

Advantages and Disadvantages of Death Penalty

...Mrs. Lalaine M. Dulanas Math Teacher Mrs. Lalaine M. Dulanas Math Teacher Jacquelyn Eya Siangco Fourth Year- D Jacquelyn Eya Siangco Fourth Year- D 3rd Grading 3rd Grading Reflection Reflection For me math is not really an easy subject. You need a lot of patience, focus and also courage. Some people doesn’t need to spend a lot of their time studying math because they were really good at it but in my case I realize that I was not really got at this subject so I need to double or even triple my time to understand more and to learn more. Math also needs time to understand. You need to spend your time and also effort to get want you want because if you work hard fot it you have the chance to get what you work hard for. It was just some of the people easily gave up on this subject. There was never been a winner on those who gave up. If you want to learn you must work for it. If you want to understand do some effort. I consider myself as a pessimistic person. I hate facing problems because I think I cannot solved it alone. I was so dependent with other persons most especially my bestfriend since my mother was gone and maybe that’s the reason why I don’t love math but now I’ve realize that life is just like a unsolved problem. You need to work for it, you need to do some efforts, you must dig deeper to get the solutions and to solved the problems. For me math is not really an easy subject. You need a lot of patience, focus and also courage. Some people doesn’t need...

Words: 1243 - Pages: 5

The Death Penalty

...unjust standard. With the lack of punishment as severe as the death penalty, the astonishing number of criminals that walk the streets after serving their short sentences are a risk to not only our current generations, but future justice systems as a whole. In turn, I propose the implementation of the death penalty in the Canadian justice system. The death penalty is a form of punishment one convicted of a serious crime receives which results in the ending of the offender’s life. These executions are primarily conducted through the use of lethal injections or hangings, often leaving the choice to the condemned. Introducing this form of punishment is a necessity for the Canadian justice system. Canada has always taken pride in its “just” society, but is this truly the case? According to dictionary.com “Just” refers to being or behaving accordingly to what is fair. A just society requires the death sentence as the punishment an individual receives for their action must be fair and according to the crime they have committed. In the case of a murder, jail time would not be seen as a fair consequence in comparison to the event the victim was forced to overcome. The only appropriate retribution for the disorderly conduct would be equally taking the offenders life. It is not to say that the death penalty must be used in every conviction, but in the event of a murder, deathly rape, or other life threatening crimes, the death row would be an appropriate repercussion. In 2012......

Words: 1516 - Pages: 7

Death Penalty

...For decades people have debated the death penalty. These discussions have taken place at the water cooler in the workplace as well as at family dinners. Some people see it as a barbaric form of torture, and others see it as a necessity of modern life. Most people do not understand the complex issues that heads of states need to evaluate regarding the death penalty. In conference rooms they discuss issues such as costs, wrongful convictions and what they could do with the additional revenues. Even though some people see the death penalty as a crime deterrent, in this economy individual states have to rethink the financial costs involved. Many people do not realize the additional costs associated with a death penalty case. People who are in support of the death penalty believe that it is cheaper to execute a criminal than to leave them in a jail cell paid for with the money individual's pay to the government in taxes. California is second to Texas in regard to juries and county prosecutors condemning people with a death sentence. (Tempest, 2005) What they do not realize is that at times it can take more than two decades for a death sentence to come to the conclusion of an execution. The trial alone in a death penalty case can cost millions more to prosecute. A study in Maryland estimates that the average cost to taxpayers for reaching a single death sentence is $3 million - $1.9 million more than the cost of a non-death penalty case. (Roman, J., Chalfin, A.,......

Words: 1670 - Pages: 7