C. Merck & River Blindness

In: Business and Management

Submitted By karena
Words 1629
Pages 7
Merck and Co. and river blindness
MANUEL VELASQUEZ, Business Ethics. Concepts and cases 4th edt., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1998
River blindness is an agonizing disease that affects some 18 million impoverished people living in remote villages along the banks of rivers in tropical regions of Africa and Latin America. The disease is caused by a tiny parasitic worm that is passed from person to person by the bite of the black fly which breeds in river waters. The tiny worms burrow under a person's skin where they grow as long as two feet curled up inside ugly round nodules half an inch to an inch in diameter. Inside the nodules the worms reproduce by releasing millions of microscopic offsprings called microfilaria that wriggle their way throughout the body moving beneath the skin, discoloring it as they migrate, and causing lesions and such intense itching that victims sometimes commit suicide. Eventually, the microfilaria invade the eyes and gradually blind the victim.
Spraying pesticides to eradicate the black fly faltered when it developed an immunity to the pesticides. Moreover, the only drugs available to treat the parasite in humans have been so expensive, have such severe side effects, and require such lenghty hospital stays that the treatments are impractical for the destitute victims who live in isolated villages.
In many countries people have fled the areas along the rivers, abandoning large tracts of rich fertile land. Many of them, however, eventually return because distant lands prove difficult to farm.Most villagers along the rivers come to accept the nodules, the torturous itching, and eventual blindness as an inescapable part of life.
In 1979, Dr. William Campbell, a research scientist working for Merck and Company, an American drug company, discovered evidence that one of the company's best-selling animal drugs,…...

Similar Documents

River Blindess Merck

...Intro River blindness is a disease that mostly affects people living in remote areas near river banks in tropical regions of Africa and Latin America. The disease is caused by a parasitic worm that travels through a black fly that breeds in the rivers of these areas. The black fly bites individuals and worms grow inside of the affected persons skin cause the skin to show unsightly nodules. After the birth of a few worms these worms then multiply inside the affected person and cause intense pain. The initial defense against was pesticides, but the flies built an immunity to the pesticides. In many areas people were forced to leave their areas, but many of them returned because the found it was hard to survive in more distant areas. In 1978 Dr. Campbell made the discovery of  ivermectin, a new ant parasitic compound under investigation for use in animals.           Campbell felt that ivermectin was the answer to the disease river blindness that plagued millions in the Third World.  In order to find out if Campbell's hypothesis held true, Merck would have to spend millions of dollars to develop the right strain for human use, conduct the field trials in the most remote parts of the world.  Even if these efforts produced an effective and safe drug, virtually none of those afflicted with river blindness could afford to buy it.  Dr. Ray Vagelos, originally a university researcher but by then a Merck executive, was faced with decision of investing in research for a drug that...

Words: 526 - Pages: 3

Merck

...for Vagelos as CEO and for Merck as a company in deciding whether to invest in Dr. Campbell’s idea Although Dr. Campbell’s idea of a drug (Ivermectin) that could cure River blindness was a path-breaking opportunity for Merck, the company was faced with a number of ethical, financial and moral issues that forced its CEO to undergo deep thought and contemplation before investing in this idea. * Feasibility: There were concerns about the use of this drug on humans and the potential adverse side effects, if any. * High Costs: The high costs associated with research and development coupled with the fact that the drug was to be used by lower income groups meant that it showed little or no economic promise. * Cannibalization: From a pure business standpoint, Merck worried that this drug could cannibalize profits from the animal version of the drug through the creation of possible black markets in the affected countries. Percentage of research budget that Merck should invest in drugs that will produce a substandard return on investment As a company that produces drugs to cure diseases in both humans and animals, Merck operates in a complex dynamic that requires it to take decisions that may not lead to profitability. Further, its corporate philosophy always revolved around the fact that the company’s first priority was the safety of people and only then did profits follow. I, therefore, believe that Merck should invest a large......

Words: 565 - Pages: 3

River Blindness

...MERCK AND RIVER BLINDNESS 1. Think about the definition of stakeholders — any parties with a stake in the organization’s actions or performance. Who are the stakeholders in this situation? How many can you list? On what basis would you rank them in importance? People suffering from the disease or those who potentially may be infected – would directly benefit from the cure Merck employees at all levels – profitability and the economic health of the company affects current employees Merck shareholders – inability to profit from the drug might have a negative effect on shareholder’s value, but taking the stand on “doing the right thing” might have a favorable effect on company’s reputation and increase the value of the stock Various healthcare organizations – Merck is one of the leaders in the industry whose actions or inactions may affect the state of the industry as a whole One way to rank stakeholders in importance is by their level of benefit from the drug putting people suffering from the disease in the first place as they would benefit the most from the invent of the cure. Then, employees and shareholders would share the second place, provided that the company would most likely not be able to recover funds invested in the long and expensive process of developing the drug which in turn would affect company’s profitability. Finally, various healthcare organizations would rank third; the effect on them would depend on the level of their involvement in the......

Words: 2838 - Pages: 12

Merck

...UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Graduate School of Business Administration Finance 553 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLANNING Winter 2003 Professor Robert C. (Rocky) Higgins 306 Mackenzie Hall Tel: 543-4379 E-mail: rhiggins@u.washington.edu Homepage: http://us.badm.washington.edu/higgins/ (From here you’re one click from the class page) Office Hours: M, W: 10:30 – 12:00 COURSE OBJECTIVE Capital Investment Planning is a case course examining corporate investment decisions and related issues in financial strategy. The course is intended as a continuation of Finance 552, Corporate Planning and Financing, and is suitable for generalists and finance specialists who seek a solid grounding in corporate financial management. Finance 555 may be substituted for Finance 552 as a prerequisite. Principal topics include: use of discounted cash flow analysis to evaluate investment opportunities, estimating capital costs, or discount rates, capital budgeting systems and their affect on resource allocation decisions, valuing a company or division, merger analysis, corporate restructuring including leveraged buyouts, and issues in financial strategy. When you complete this course, you should be able to: Estimate an investment’s relevant costs and benefits Estimate a company's weighted-average cost of capital and understand its role in investment decision making Use discounted cash flow techniques, decision trees, and simulation to analyze investment opportunities Value (i...

Words: 3270 - Pages: 14

Merck-River Blindness

...Merck- River Blindness Case Analysis Section 1: Introduction and situational analysis: Merck is an American-based international pharmaceutical company with a history that spans almost 350 years. The company focuses on innovative research and consumer education. (Demand Media, 1999-2011 ) In 1950, George W. Merck, then the chairman of the company said, “We try never to forget that medicine is for people. It is not for the profits. The profits follow, and if we have remembered that, they have never failed to appear. The better we have remembered that, the larger they have been.” This philosophy was at the core of Merck and Co.’s values system. (Kreitner, 2010) In 1978, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that over 300,000 people were blind and another 18 million were affected with a disease called onchocerciasis, better known as river blindness. River blindness was caused by parasitic worms that was spread by small black flies the breed in and lived around fast moving rivers mostly in developing countries in the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. The parasitic larvae were transferred to humans when bitten by the small black flies, at which time the parasitic larvae would infect the host. The worms would begin to reproduce producing millions of microscopic baby worms into the person’s body. This would eventually lead to gross deformity, severe itching that in some cases cause people to commit suicide and eventually blindness. At the time, the disease......

Words: 1861 - Pages: 8

River Blindness

...Merck& River Blindness Merck& River Blindness Research suggests that a new vaccine that worked for animals would help to kill the parasite that caused river blindness. The resource could take an enormous amount of time and money to develop a new vaccine. At the same time, there is no guarantee that the drug would have a buy in value in the market that could affect the company’s name and the shares. One reason for the difficulty to sell the product is that this vaccine is the animal version of vaccine. Despite the company’s loss, Merck and company were obligated to study and produce the human version of the vaccine. The company’s chairman stated that the medicine is for people and not for the profit of the company. The company was aware that the vaccine will not produce enough profit for the company, but yet the company wanted to develop ethics. Merck and river blindness are a good example for Utilitarianism theory because the results brought happiness for both the company and the people. Utilitarianism is an ethical framework that focuses on the outcomes or results of actions. In fact, its name comes from the Greek word Telos, which means “end.” The two most influential developers of the utilitarian viewpoint were Englishmen Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873). Under this framework, acting ethically means making decisions and taking actions that benefit people by maximizing “good” and minimizing “bad.” Outcomes, results, or goals are the......

Words: 272 - Pages: 2

Merck & Co.

...Merck & Company Project Selection Decision Introduction As Merck & Company’s lead project manager I have to decide whether to invest its resources in one of two projects. One project is to pursue a cure for river blindness, a disease that has plagued third world countries for a number of years now and the second project is to re-package a very popular and profitable anti-depression drug for the Western market. In this concise report I plan to look at both options through SWOT analysis. I will be drawing on other relevant project selection strategy and making an informed decision from the analysis conducted. Merck & Company was founded on “medicine for the people”. This statement from George W. Merck, the company founder’s son and former chairman has not always sat comfortably with all senior executives within the business. He had a strong sense of morality within business and that philosophy has seen the company to where it is today. Discussion The case to pursue with the project to cure river blindness raises a number of questions. When comparing the two I am going to look at what decision is best for the company to align its business strategy with the project selection. | River Blindness Project | | Anti-Depression Repackaging Project | Investment | $2,000,000 | | $500,000 | Annual Savings | $50,000 | | $500,000 | | | | | Payback Period | 40 years | | 1 year | Looking at Financial models, in this case it is clear that......

Words: 1279 - Pages: 6

Merck

...Executive Summary The following analysis of Merck and Company was to thoroughly examine a drug licensing opportunity with LAB Pharmaceuticals, a small pharmaceutical firm. This firm has offered to allow Merck and Company rights to further development of the drug called Davanrik. The analysis includes calculations of probability and decision trees using the Microsoft program Excel. It is assumed that given probabilities are correct, however sensitivity analyses were conducted to show the overall effect of cost and probability changes. Risk was also considered as a major factor in this analysis. It has been determined that Merck & Company should accept the offer from LAB Pharmaceuticals because of the predicted revenue. The relative risk involved with this project is high; however, it has been determined to be part of the nature of the pharmaceutical industry and previous drug development endeavors. Background The nature of the pharmaceutical industry includes a variety of factors. Three of these factors will be described. First, development of a drug can take several decades and therefore pharmaceutical companies incur large research and development expenses with no revenue in return. Because of this, larger pharmaceutical companies that have sufficient capital have typically dominated the drug market. Merck & Co., Inc, a global research-driven pharmaceutical company, has been able to achieve substantial returns to capital by discovering, developing, manufacturing and......

Words: 1914 - Pages: 8

Merck Case

...suffering from the disease or those who potentially may be infected – would directly benefit from the cure Merck employees at all levels – profitability and the economic health of the company affects current employees Merck shareholders – inability to profit from the drug might have a negative effect on shareholder’s value, but taking the stand on “doing the right thing” might have a favorable effect on company’s reputation and increase the value of the stock Various healthcare organizations – Merck is one of the leaders in the industry whose actions or inactions may affect the state of the industry as a whole One way to rank stakeholders in importance is by their level of benefit from the drug putting people suffering from the disease in the first place as they would benefit the most from the invent of the cure. Then, employees and shareholders would share the second place, provided that the company would most likely not be able to recover funds invested in the long and expensive process of developing the drug which in turn would affect company’s profitability. Finally, various healthcare organizations would rank third; the effect on them would depend on the level of their involvement in the process. 2. What are the potential costs and benefits of such an investment? Developing a drug to combat river blindness has substantial potential costs and befits. Merck discovered an opportunity to treat millions of affected people around the world but it knew that the......

Words: 321 - Pages: 2

Merck Case Solution

...Stakeholders There are many, including employees, stockholders, people with river blindness, the communities where those people live, those with other diseases, governments, the media, perhaps competitors, etc. Cost & Benefit This is difficult, as always, because once again we have no crystal ball. The potential to discover a drug for this terrible disease certainly exists and the company’s research scientists think it is possible. The outcomes for those with the disease would be very positive and there could also be very positive media attention and reputational effects. But, there is also the potential to invest years and millions of dollars, and come up empty handed. Employee morale is a potential cost or benefit. Scientists are extremely important to pharmaceutical companies and Merck’s research scientists wanted to pursue this. Allowing them to do so, might make them feel good about themselves and their work. Finally, there are opportunity costs. What drugs might “not” get discovered, because scientists were working on this one The choice That Company has: Distribute New Medicine Protect Veterinary Business Merck Should Develop Companies do not justify every investment to shareholders, so we are not convinced that they would need to justify this one. But, they certainly would not be able to justify it in terms of the financial bottom line. They would have to justify it in terms of goodwill, or some other more difficult to measure criterion. ...

Words: 776 - Pages: 4

Blindness

...“Blindness”, originally written in Portuguese by a well-known author named José Saramago, is a novel that tells the story of a sudden epidemic of blindness by which nearly all the citzens of an unnamed city were effected. It is an interesting and breathtaking story that envolves the reader in a way that makes it almost impossible to stop reading it, because you can’t wait to find out how it ends. In the beginning of the novel, the author describes the events in which the main characters went blind. The first one was a man who was driving his car in very chaotic traffiic and then, unexpectedly is caught by the blindness that is not yet seen as an epidemic. As many people start losing their sight, the government decides in an attempt to contain the apparent cotagion, to take extremely repressive measures quarantining all the blind people in an asylum which quickly becomes overcrowded. Those who were quarantined were forced to stay in filthy and inhumane conditions while they struggled to survive. Avid readers will, in many cases, say that when a book is adapted into a movie, it becomes an oversimplified version of the original and leaves behind many important facts that cause the story to be interestingly overwhelming. I partially agree with this sort of opinion, however, the film version of the book was also a fantastic production. The book and the movie can be seen through different perspectives. The book allows you to let your imagination flow and create alongside the......

Words: 440 - Pages: 2

Merck Case - Business Ethic

...Vagelos as CEO and for Merck as a company in deciding whether to invest in Dr. Campbell’s idea? The stakes for Roy Vagelos as CEO would be the high level of risk to succeed, the strong change to have a low level of profitability even after the success, and the advantage of Dr Campbell’s project, less investment needed and government aid in tax. And the stakes for Merck as a company would be the corporate ethic it has pursued and Merck’s need to develop another new successful prescription. Q2. How does Merck pick from among the many ways to “do good” and many drugs to invest in? Merck took 12 years and $200 million to bring a new drug to market on the average. And thousands of scientists worked on new ideas and following new leads. It uses various methods to choose the project through extensive review and analysis on the basis of the likelihood of success, the existing market, competition, potential safety problems, manufacturing feasibility and patent. Q3. How much of its research budget should Merck invest in drugs that will likely produce a substandard return on its investment? The research budget should be considered in research/development expenses, expected income with the tax benefit from the government, and mostly the effect and impact based on the corporate ethics and morale. Q4. What should Merck tell a shareholder who might complain about a decision to invest in research on river blindness? The overall corporate philosophy of Merck is based on......

Words: 336 - Pages: 2

Merck

...Merck – Business Analysis MGMT 521 October 17, 2011 Dr. Patrick E. Murray Merck – Business Analysis A mutual fund manager invests in many securities. Experiences and success open new opportunities to future investments. Merck is one of the largest and well-known pharmaceutical companies in the world. The decision to invest is determent on many factors. This includes a SWOT analysis of Merck and taking information from this analysis to decide whether to invest. Internal and external stakeholders along with their wants and needs are identified. Finally, an explanation of Merck's handling current and future stakeholder needs is determined. This research helps in making the decision to invest or not with Merck. SWOT Analysis |Strengths |Weaknesses | | | | |A diversified product portfolio |Reduction in OTC (over-the-counter) products | | | | |Global efforts to decrease maternity mortality |Possible reduction in workforce | |ration | | | | ......

Words: 1532 - Pages: 7

Merck& River Blindness

...Research suggests that a new vaccine that worked for animals would help to kill the parasite that caused river blindness. The resource could take an enormous amount of time and money to develop a new vaccine. At the same time, there is no guarantee that the drug would have a buy in value in the market that could affect the company’s name and the shares. One reason for the difficulty to sell the product is that this vaccine is the animal version of vaccine. Despite the company’s loss, Merck and company were obligated to study and produce the human version of the vaccine. The company’s chairman stated that the medicine is for people and not for the profit of the company. The company was aware that the vaccine will not produce enough profit for the company, but yet the company wanted to develop ethics. Merck and river blindness are a good example for Utilitarianism theory because the results brought happiness for both the company and the people. Utilitarianism is an ethical framework that focuses on the outcomes or results of actions. In fact, its name comes from the Greek word Telos, which means “end.” The two most influential developers of the utilitarian viewpoint were Englishmen Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873). Under this framework, acting ethically means making decisions and taking actions that benefit people by maximizing “good” and minimizing “bad.” Outcomes, results, or goals are the focus—not the action taken to achieve them. Utilitarians......

Words: 266 - Pages: 2

Merck

...Merck and River Blindness Felicia Wiggins and Julie Helling PHL 323 July 16, 2012 Dr. John Rhome Merck and River Blindness Merck Company researches and develops medications for human and animal use, to improve health and well-being. Merck is a business, driven by fundamental values motivated by a desire to improve human life, accomplish scientific quality, operate with the highest standards of integrity, expand access to Merck products and employ a varied staff that values teamwork (Merck, 2009-2012). The Problem The problem is not the production of a medication that will help thousands of people in the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America from a parasite produced by a small black fly when the person is bit referred to as River Blindness. The problem is whether to produce this medication, ivermectin, which costs several millions dollars for Merck to produce. Merck would never be able to recoup its money because the people who need this drug are small and these people would not be able to purchase the medication. Company scientists encouraged Merck to invest in further research to determine if the medicine ivermectin could be altered to be safe for human consumption when Merck could not realize a profit. Because resources limited, money and time have to go into the research and development of medications that will produce a profit for Merck. This allows Merck to further relieve human suffering and gain a profit to keep continuing to produce medicines. Rare......

Words: 1647 - Pages: 7