Free Essay

Eng100 Ethics Essay

In: English and Literature

Submitted By didim93
Words 1702
Pages 7
Devika Mathur
ENG100
Ryan Bloom
10 April 2013
Baby’s First Word: Designer
There was once a time when the term designer was used only in terms of style and fashion. It was a choice between brands such as Gucci, Prada, or Armani and never a choice between disabilities, skin color, or gender. It is sad to say the word designer no longer applies to just materials anymore, it’s reached a new level; genetics. There is nothing ethical about being able to essentially manipulate the genes of a fetus to reflect characteristics deemed suitable by the parents. The characteristics chosen by the parents, such as a medical miracle match of genes to another sibling, set the child up to become what the parents want and not necessarily what the child wants to be. Genetic alteration of the baby also contributes to the unfairness that is gender preference and gender based discrimination. The possibility of genetic hierarchies, to which those that are not genetically enhanced are considered inferior, will increase tremendously because of the increasing gap between classes. It is understandable that technology is moving humanity towards a better more advanced future, but what shouldn’t be forgotten is that some things created in nature cannot be replaced by technology. Designer babies are just one of the few gray areas in which science infringes upon the way of nature. Scientists claim that not everything about genetically altered test tube babies can be considered bad. Science has been able to manipulate fetuses to be born with distinct genes and traits that are considered “savior” because everything about them can be used to help an ailing sibling. The process of selectively screening certain genetic traits and then re-implanting them back into the mother is called Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis. The term designer is derived from this process because the process enables the parents to screen for possible characteristics of the baby. They can then chose the traits they want the baby to exhibit and then implant the cells back into the womb to be born. Scientist claim that this process allows for many parents to actively chose the genetic makeup of the child which could be highly beneficial in situations that involve a very ill sibling in need of tissue/organ/stem cell matches. That’s a real positive side, right? One sibling saving the life of the other is what real love is exemplified as. While some may deem that to be true, I believe real love isn’t all about the continued sacrifice of one child for another. Where is the consideration and compassion for the “savior” child who is subjected to all the medical procedures? There was a novel written by Jodi Picoult called My Sister’s Keeper and it was based around the story of this family who had decided to conceive a baby that was a perfect match to help save their eldest daughter who was suffering from leukemia. In the novel, the young “savior” child decided to sue her parents for the right to her own body. The focus in the novel was not the court case for medical emancipation, but rather what the author was trying to portray was that in an effort to save one child some parents and people forget that they may be subjecting the other child to extremes. The savior children were never given any freedom to choose what they want for themselves. What often gets overlooked in situations like My Sister’s Keeper is the sacrifice of the designer baby to help the suffering normal child. So no, there is no real positive in having one child suffer in attempt to save another. From the moment of conception the child is already set up to serve a certain purpose, and the basic freedom to choose their future is denied. Hair color, eye color, skin color, gender and genetic faults or pre-depositions are determined by the parents and nothing is left to chance or the will of the child. Do they have the right to say no to being the blood and organ bank for a sibling or will the sibling love be lorded over them in silent expectation of what they were essentially born to do? Let’s say that the possibility of having a boy or a girl was fifty-fifty, and a coin toss could determine the gender of the child. What would you as a parent chose; a boy or a girl? Traditionally speaking, boys are supposed to carry on the family name and take over the family business someday. Girls are thought to be expensive and eventually need to be married off; a burden. To people that live in modern developed countries like the U.S, these outdated and sexist perspectives seem ridiculous. Yet surprisingly, these outdated and sexist perspectives are still considered and upheld in some countries all over the world. A population census done by the United Nations in 2012 showed that a great deal of countries hold an equal ratio of women to men. Yet the census also showed quite a few countries with shockingly low ratios of women to men. In Qatar, there are roughly 32 women per 100 men in a total population of 1,939 people. The perspective held about girls in countries like Qatar lead to the mass killings of hundreds of baby girls because of the sole reason that that are girls. This plays in with the designer babies because parents that chose to have a designer baby can determine the gender of the child as well other qualities. So if parents were given the choice, those that still believe girls to be lesser to boys, will chose to have a boy instead of a girl. It is not the same as murdering a baby girl, but it is essentially creating a greater disadvantage for girls in the world. The fifty-fifty chance has been skewed in the favor of boys. Gender bias still very much exists in our modern world and test tube children do nothing to help that bias because the world and humanity is less than ideal. A perfect utopian world is not something that will ever be possible, but is something to strive for. The rate at which science has advanced the world is mind- boggling and frankly a little scary. If we were to look some 50 years into the future, genetically altered babies would not be considered so revolutionary. It would probably, with time, would have been further advanced and refined to be considered a normal aspect to consider when thinking of having a child. There could even be more characteristics that are up for consideration like athletic ability, artistic ability or intelligence. Parents, who can afford it, can basically build their perfect little baby. Parents that cannot afford a designer baby are stuck with letting nature chose for them. As a rough cost in 2012, Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis is some $3,550 in addition to the cost of regular in-vitro fertilization. So what does that mean for the children that got stuck with the short end of the gene stick? They may very well be considered inferior to the children that were enhanced. The social hierarchy will favor the children with enhanced abilities and essentially shun the children that were born without. With increased ability, every child’s performance will also be greatly improved and the overall competition will get much more challenging. The children that were not genetically improved will not stand much of a chance in the competition, and will unfortunately not get very far in their lives because of the consideration that they are for all purposes inept. What sort of life is that for a child? Looking at our present time, this hypothetical social hierarchy is seemingly parallel to the situation between children born healthy and normal and children born with disabilities like dyslexia or autism. It is a constant struggle for disables children to achieve things that healthy children can do every day. They are considered disadvantaged, inept, and unlikely to succeed in many things; like the normal children in comparison to the genetically altered super children. Scientist will argue that genetic enhancement will help to reduce or eliminate genetically linked disabilities like deafness or Down syndrome. While that may sound promising and wonderful for humanity, it also factors into increasing the gap between the elite, normal and disabled. Those that can’t afford genetic enhancement of their children are not given the choice to screen for any possible disabilities, and if for example a child with a disability is born, then that child and parents must face the social repercussions and disadvantages that come along with being significantly low in the genetic hierarchy. We as people, at some point in our adult lives, all wish to start a family. It is natural to want to have children; it is the way nature intended for the population to survive. But as people turned prospective parents, there are things that need to be considered. It is understandable that the allure of designer babies is that parents can fashion a baby to be as perfect as possible. All parents want the best of their kids. What needs to be considered is what is best for the kids. Designer babies present a whole slew of problems like developing genetic hierarchies, increased gender discrimination and unfair treatment of savior children. So we come back to the question, what is wrong with just leaving certain processes of nature up to nature itself to decide? Why don’t we let Gucci, Prada, and Armani take care of the fabrics, colors, and design; while nature takes care of everything else.

Works Cited
"United Nations Statistics Division - Demographic and Social Statistics." United Nations Statistics Division - Demographic and Social Statistics. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Apr. 2013.
Johnson, Priya. "Pros and Cons of Designer Babies." Buzzle.com. Buzzle.com, 20 Mar. 2013. Web. 15 Apr. 2013.
"PGD - Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis." PGD - Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Health News, n.d. Web. 28 Apr. 2013.
Picoult, Jodi. My Sister's Keeper: A Novel. New York: Atria, 2004. Print
"What Is a Designer Baby?" What Is a Designer Baby? N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Apr. 2013. .…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay Brock Q. Griffin ETH/316 October 01, 2012 Aron Muse Ethics Essay The science of right and wrong in human action, or as some believe it is what society deems to be right and wrong is what defines ethics (Boylan, 2009). What makes up ethics in a person? Is it his character as in virtue, or does it relate to family influence or a team concept as in utilitarianism. Does it manifest from a sense of duty as with deontological ethics? In this paper we’ll take a look at the differences in how each addresses ethics and morality. Deontological In this theory of ethics the emphasis is on doing what is right just because it’s right. However this theory can be related to both virtue and at some level utilitarianism. The similarity is that without a standard or virtue to hold you accountable you wouldn’t just up and perform deontological ethics. Your morals kick in as your foundation and you just do without thinking. Example is to open a door for someone, or to stand-up and let a pregnant woman sit down in a crowded area. In that situation you normally don’t think you just react. Utilitarianism Is the team concept or the action that produces more of a utility for the group. Utilitarianism is often contrasted with deontological for the fact that it’s calculated or thought out before the action is done. Where it differs from virtue is that it might not be installed in you, but in order to not bring negativity toward your group you......

Words: 481 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay Michael McPhetrige ETH316 09/19/2013 Mr. David Trammell Ethics Essay In our world, there are many different ways to approach ethics. We all have our different opinions on what ethics are, or as I like to say, our own ethical codes. However, we can relate to other peoples theories. Some theories that can be related to, but are different from each other, are virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. “Utilitarianism is a theory that suggest that an action is morally right when that action produces more total utility for the group than any other alternative” (Boylan, 2009). Basically, utilitarianism looks out for the greater good of the group instead of an individual. This means that if you are a hinder to the group, making a change in yourself or your position to better the group is utilitarianism. I believe this theory is a very good one. It is about putting others before you. The world might be a better place if everyone thought this way. The Virtue theory is based more on an individual’s character. “It takes the viewpoint that in living your life you should try to cultivate excellence in all that you do and all that others do” (Boylan, 2009). Reading this I was thinking about “one hit wonders” in the music industry (especially rappers). In rap music, should someone be considered one of the greats because they made one good song? Or should rappers like Tupac and Eminem be legends because they have had multiple platinum selling albums?...

Words: 581 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Running head: ETHICS ESSAY Ethics Essay Rebecca Ferns University of Phoenix ETH316 Jamal Ibrahim June 12, 2013 Ethics Essay Introduction The BBC’s Ethics Guide (2013) explains, “At its simplest, ethics is a system of moral principles. They affect how people make decisions and lead their lives.” However, there are various principles within the philosophical practice of ethics that shape how those decisions are made. In this essay virtual, utilitarianism and deontological theoretical ethical theories will be defined and compared. Virtue Ethics In the Basic Ethics textbook (Boylan, 2009), virtue ethics is defined as “taking the viewpoint that in living your life you should try to cultivate excellence in all that you do and all that others do. These excellences or virtues are both moral and non-moral. For instance, this principle takes the long look at one’s character and is somewhat forgiving of an occasional slipup that is not in consonance with that person’s historical character.” Thus, for instance, people who lied occasionally were not necessarily immoral or bad people if they did not lie regularly. These lies are especially acceptable for instance if the person only lies in order to protect another person’s safety or feelings. Utilitarianism Meanwhile, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Driver, 2009) explains that “utilitarianism is generally held to be the view that the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. One......

Words: 680 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay Sharon Batts ETH/316 February 10, 2014 Professor Heller Ethics Essay Ethical growth is an important instrument needed in today’s society. Virtue, deontological, and utilitarianism theories have similarities and differences. Each theory relates to morals and ethics in precise ways, just as virtue, values, and morality have a precise relationship with one another. Virtue theory relates to ethics by identifying the character of a person as honorable, dependable, loyal, honest, or as untrustworthy, deceiving, careless, or self-serving. Basically a person is described as “good” or “bad”, or a mixture of both. People develop character throughout life as a mirror image of his or her morals. Virtue ethics define a person’s character more so than his or her actions. The downside of this theory is that it does not make allowance for good people who make bad mistake (Garrett, 2005). A teenager may give into peer pressure to steal a car. The teen may have high morals and ethics, but made a foolish decision. Virtue theory defines the teen as a bad person rather than as a good person who did a bad act. The next ethical theory, utilitarianism, focuses on determining the choice for the actions and the choice made depends on the course of action that has the best consequences for that person. The actions of a person are believed to be morally correct or incorrect based only on the outcome of the actions. Therefore, if the result is good, the action is morally right.......

Words: 919 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Week One: Ethics Essay Prestine Crosby ETH/316 January 20, 2014 Kevin Forsberg Ethics Essay Virtue theory takes the viewpoint that in living your life you should try to cultivate excellence in all that you do and all that others do (Boylan, 2009). They are based on living a good life that and being a good person; that can be based upon lifestyles, accomplishments, education and the type of job you have. This theory you have to establish an ethical and moral code or yourself that will enable you to do what is right. Utilitarianism a theory that suggests that an action is morally right when that action produces more total utility for the group than any other alternatives (Boylan, 2009). Also refers to a person is truly focused on being happy this can be achieved by trying to avoid negative people and situations. This theory can cause a compromise of both morals and ethics depending upon the situation. Deontological is a moral theory that emphasizes one’s duty to do a particular action just because the action, itself, is inherently right and not through any other sorts of calculation (Boylan, 2009). This is basically doing what is best for you without taking into consideration for anyone else. I feel that with this theory ethics and morals are completely out of place. In our discussion questions you touched on a subject that really brought back sad memories. Almost two years ago I had a family......

Words: 468 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay Steven L. McClain ETH/316 April 14, 2014 Aaron Rawls Ethics Essay Ethics has many definitions that are similar, so I decided to choose what I thought would fit it best. According to "Business Dictionary.com" (2014), "The basic concepts and fundamental principles of decent human conduct. It includes study of universal values such as the essential equality of all men and women, human or natural rights, obedience to the law of land, concern for health and safety and, increasingly, also for the natural environment” (para. 1). This definition sums up ethics well for me, but I believe that morals have great influence on ethics and thus I feel a definition of morals is needed. Bernard (2002), "Morality (from the Latin moralities "manner, character, proper behavior") is the differentiation of intentions, decisions, and actions between those that are "good" (or right) and those that are "bad" (or wrong)” (para. 1). So now we have the informalities out of the way, we can get to what we really want to talk about, which is the difference between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. Rainbow (2002), "The virtue ethical theory judges a person by his character rather than by an action that may deviate from his normal behavior. It takes the person's morals, reputation and motivation into account when rating an unusual and irregular behavior that is considered unethical” (Virtue). Basically this definition states that someone’s past is used as a......

Words: 523 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay ETH/316 Dr. Jody Kehle October 31, 2013 Ethics Essay The comparison in the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics explains how an individual handles moral and ethical issues on a daily basis. Virtual theory uses the judgment of ones character rather than ones actions. The individual’s morals, reputation, and motivation are some of the factors used in this theory to help determine ones character. This theory does not take into consideration a change in moral behavioral character. Utilitarian theory is based on the capability to predict the consequences ones own action. The utilitarian uses the point system and prediction of solutions. Utilitarian has two types; act utilitarian and rule utilitarian. Each of the utilitarian types is somewhat different, yet similar. Act utilitarian is the same as the utilitarian theory; however, rule utilitarian considers the law and justice. Deontological theory is one that is based on the belief that one should adhere to ones own commitments and duties when dealing with an issue. One of the benefits of this theory is that one will use this bases for commitments and duties to others. For example, a grandmother may feel the warrant to take care of her grandchildren, when they are in financial need. All these theories can demonstrate moral and ethical behaviors for those individuals that adhere to them on a daily basis. In my own personal experience, I am able......

Words: 410 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay Edenn James ETH/316 June 2, 2014 Mary Carter Ethics Essay For my paper I want to start off with what I believe to my understanding of each of the theories and then give the similarities and difference and then a personal experience using one of the theories. VIRTUE ETHICS-this theory is about your character and how others might see you as being moral or nonmoral. It is sometimes called agent-based or character ethics. It is you striving for excellence in what and how you do things in your life. (Boylan, 2009) DEONTOLOGY-this theory is about doing one’s duty of a particular action because that action is right and not because of any other calculations of the action such as what the consequences of the action might be. (Boylan, 2009) UTILTARIANISM-this theory is where you put the needs of the team before your own needs for the betterment of the team. Your actions are morally right because it produces a more total unity for the team. (Boylan, 2009) The similarities of each of these theories are that it involves how you act in your everyday life to follow what you believe to be the right thing to do. In all three theories your moral beliefs play a significant role. The difference would be the outcome of any particular situation in which you are involved in and how you come to the conclusion. With virtue ethics being about you character your goal is to strive for excellence whereas in deontology your goal is to perform your duty as other......

Words: 553 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay In this essay I will compare the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. I will also include the following in this essay a description of the differences in how each theory addresses ethics and morality, and a personal experience to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to one of the three theories Utilitarianism is a moral theory that argues that an action is right if and only if it conforms to the principle of utility. The theory accepts as true that there was a need for society to rely on reason rather than metaphysics. The central tenet of utilitarianism is what is called the “Greatest Happiness Principle’. Because the human beings are rational self-interested creatures, they seek to maximize their pleasure and minimize their pain. Deontologists hold that right actions are defined by duty. Once we know what it is that we are duty bound to do morally, then we can carry out this ‘natural’ right action regardless of the consequences. What matters, they argue, is that we do what is right what is right, and what is right is that which conforms to moral law. The Virtue Theory concept is for human beings to live well. The end or final cause of human existence is eudaimonia. Eudaimonia is most commonly translated as ‘happiness’, but a more accurate translation is ‘flourishing’. Part of being human is to live a fulfilled life. A eudaimon life is a life......

Words: 742 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay Constance Punch ETH/316 June 23, 2014 Greg Ouellette Ethics Essay Ethics is the science of right and wrong in human action.” (Manias, 2013, Chapter 1, Ethics Applied). With the reading, we can find the similarities and differences between the three major approaches in normative ethics; virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. This will be done by analyzing these ethical theories and by describing them along with presenting the facts on how each theory relates too ethics and morality. Personal experience will be used to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to one of the three theories. We have all been faced with the circumstances that have pushed our moral boundaries. Virtue ethics refers more specifically to one character embodying for determining or evaluating ethical behavior. In other words virtue ethics emphasizes one moral character.  According to Manias (2013), virtue ethics is considered at times an agent-based or character ethics. The viewpoint in your daily life is that you should try to cultivate excellence in all that you do and all that others do. For example, finding a wallet with money in it, and returning it to the rightful owner is an act of virtue. As a mom, a proud moment was the day my daughter found a wallet in a buggy and ran to turn it in before the person had a chance to leave and it be stolen. She earned a $5.00 reward for it and she smiled for weeks. As we mature we...

Words: 637 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Week 1 Ethics Essay xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Ethics and Social Responsibility xxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx Ethics Essay Ethics is a branch of philosophy that uses the behavior of people to determine the difference between what is morally right and wrong. This essay will compare and contrast three theories of ethics: Virtue, utilitarianism, and deontological. The Virtue theory focuses on a person’s virtue or moral character to define his or her behavior. Beginning with the Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle, they used reason to ask what traits make a good person? They determined that a virtue is a trait of good character that is continually practiced and manifests itself in habitual actions. These character traits would exemplify a persons “better nature.” The early Greeks believed that by acquiring the right virtues, you would act in the right way. Aristotle said that a moral virtue is a mean between two extremes, the one involving excess and the other deficiency. He believed a person who learned these good habits would continue to seek the actions to further excellent moral character. This action would lead a person to the find the medium between both extremes, but he also believed that each action was dependent on the person so no one moral mean would be sufficient. Utilitarianism is a theory put forward by Jeremy Bentham. Bentham created the Principle of Utility that states, “We should command an action if it produces benefits, advantages, please,......

Words: 640 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay John Doe ETH316 March 17, 2014 Cherie Barnes Ethics Essay Throughout history large diverse groups of people have lived together in communities of many types. All have made assumptions about who, what, and why we value what we value and what is important in each individual person’s lives. A big part of these assumptions are how each individual feels about what is right and what is wrong, as well as what actions are legal. These assumptions are grounded in ethics but what is ethics? According to Boylan (2009), in chapter one: Some view ethics as all about intuiting what is true from some other realm. Others think that it is a conventional linguistic/cultural exercise at descriptivism. Still others…believe that it is about realistic assessments about the world that inform upon the grounding of normativity. Thus, for this author, ethics is the science concerning the “right and wrong” of human action. Philosophers throughout time have studied these assumptions and came up with many theories. Three of the most popular are: Virtue Theory, Utilitarianism, and Deontological Ethics. This essay will compare the similarities and differences between the three. Virtue theory is also called character ethics. Many people use the Boy Scout law as an example of virtue theory. A Boy Scout is Trustworthy, Loyal, Helpful, Friendly, Courteous; Kind, Obedient, Cheerful, Thrifty, Brave, Clean, and Reverent. Virtue Ethics takes the viewpoint that all humans......

Words: 777 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay Wk 1 ETH 316 04/16/2012 Ethics Essay Week 1 Ethics Essay * A description of the differences in how each theory addresses ethics and morality Virtue ethics are character traits like honesty or generosity. The way I read it was they are strong morals and build your value system or system of beliefs. Utilitarianism holds the theory of what it every takes for the greater good. One of the worst examples I found was the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan during WWII it was done for the greater good of America and the world. Craziness! Deontological ethics is basic black and white. It is based on the basic qualities of an act and not the moral effect. Lying is a great example, I hate (I know strong word), but I hate lying. I feel as an adult you have no reason to lie or breaking promises (don’t make them). In Pocatello for some reason when you call a contractor for work and you leave a message they do not call you back and if they do answer they are late for the appointment. I might be old school, but what I say I do, it is my reputation. * A personal experience to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to one of the three theories I have been married for twelve years and have two step kids a boy 24 and a girl 26. I have known the kids since they were two and five years old and I love them both, but Josh I do not like as a person. He has shunned all his personal values, ethics and morals. Josh is 24 and...

Words: 455 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ethic Essay

...Ethics Essay Melody Lewis ETH/316 June 10, 2012 Bob Hughes Ethics Essay The three ethics that will be compared are virtue theory, deontological, and utilitarianism. These three ethics will compare the differences and similarities. Also while talking about how the theories address morality and ethics. Ethics is defined as a study of standards of conduct and moral judgments. Ethics is also known as the system of morals of a particular group, religion, and so on. (Webster Dictionary) Utilitarianism is believed that the reason of all activity should convey the upmost happiness of the highest figure. Utilitarianism recommends an action is morally right when actions produce greater utility for a group than any alternative. (Boylan, 2009) Virtue ethics is defined as a specific moral quality regarded as good, excellence in general, chastity, and a good quality. (Webster Dictionary) Virtue ethics is sometimes referred to as character or agent-based. This can be taken as to live life to develop or grow to perfection in everything a person does and in that others do. (Boylan, 2009) An example of this would be a friend calls and wants to come over. I do not feel like company so I lie and say I am not feeling well. This would decide what type of moral behavior and what type of character I have. Virtue ethics would decide by each situation. Deontological ethics decides the morals of a motion established from the motions hold to the guidelines. The......

Words: 420 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...Ethics Essay Angela Jones ETH/316 June 4, 2012 Michelle Kuamoo Ethics Essay Ethics Essay Virtue ethics theory judges an individual by his or her character. Utilitarianism emphasizes an individual’s actions are morally right when the actions benefit the most people. Deontology states it is an individual’s duty to do an action just because the act itself is the right thing to do (Boylan, 2009). This paper will address differences and similarities among the virtue ethics theory, deontology, and utilitarianism. Virtue ethics theory does not emphasize an individual’s duty to perform any certain act as this theory looks more at the individual’s character. The value of the action is what determines the value of the individual’s trait. However, this theory does take into consideration an individual’s reputation and looks at the bigger picture and not judge an individual on one mistake. Utilitarianism determines the moral worth of an individual by the outcome of the action. Deontology focuses more on the right and wrong of the action and not the consequence of the action. When looking at the similarities each theory does have a goal of causing less harm and support actions that benefit others. These theories are guidelines that guide individuals to making ethical decisions. The differences in these theories is utilitarianism support statements like the end does justify the means as this theory looks at an action benefiting the most individuals as the right action...

Words: 421 - Pages: 2