Human Sweatshops Outline

In: Social Issues

Submitted By yoseaweed
Words 1504
Pages 7


ATTENTION GETTER: Somewhere, someone in this room is more than likely wearing a piece of clothing or accessory that has been produced in a human sweatshop. A Sweatshop is an unfit working environment considered to be too dangerous and difficult to work in. Their widespread outbreak happened in the mid 1800’s where clothing could be produced faster and inexpensive without regulations from overseers’.

PURPOSE: (relate topic to this audience and establish credibility): The purpose of this topic is to inform the audience about the history of the sweatshops, companies impacted because of allegations, and what improvements and changes have been made to end sweatshops in the U.S. and especially in 3rd world countries.

THESIS STATEMENT: (Same sentence from above): Human sweatshops once housed some of the top U.S. clothing manufactures from the around the country; today were going to dive deep in understanding the birth of sweatshops, which companies were impacted because of the crisis, and the changes are being implemented to assist the situation.



I. MAIN POINT (state as a single declarative sentence): The history of Human Sweatshops dates back into the mid 1800’s incorporating the introduction & criticism to follow in the later years (1900s) because of rising issues.

A. SUBPOINT: The definition of a human sweatshop is mixed all around, but all together have similar connections.

1. According to Webster’s Dictionary (2012), a sweatshop is a shop or factory in which employees work for long hours at low wages and under unhealthy conditions.

B. SUBPOINT: Starting in 1850, poor families migrated to the cities where large populations could work easily in the first created sweatshirts.

1. Sweatshops originated in London and New York.…...

Similar Documents


...It’s been 16 years since Charles Kernaghan made Kathie Lee Gifford cry on national television, revealing that her Wal-Mart-sold clothing line was produced by Honduran children working 20-hour shifts. It was an essential moment in bringing labor conditions in the developing world — specifically in the garment industry — to the attention of the American public. But not that much has changed. Looking back on the movement and its achievements in an interview, Kernaghan sounds defeated, even as he reels off the list of horrific factories exposed by his Institute for Global Labour and Human Rights. Kernaghan’s gloomy mood stems from the report he is writing now on a recent trip to Northern Bengal, where the Institute secretly met with workers from the Rosita and Megatex factories to follow up on a previous exposé. The two factories produce expensive sweaters for an array of European apparel companies, companies which assure their customers that the workers are guaranteed the core rights established by the International Labor Organization (ILO), including freedom of association and the elimination of child labor. Well, that turns out not to exactly be the case. And it turns out that most Americans still likely know very little about the conditions under which the clothes they wear were produced. “It was ridiculous. In fact it was one of the worst factories we’ve seen,” says Kernaghan. “There was child labor, people were being beaten, cheated of their wages — and wages were very,...

Words: 538 - Pages: 3

Kant and Utiliarianism on Sweatshops

...By definition a sweatshop is a “negatively connoted term for any working environment considered to be unacceptably difficult or dangerous. Sweatshop workers often work long hours for very low pay in horrible conditions, regardless of laws mandating overtime pay and or minimum wage”. Many corporations in the United States use sweatshop labor in countries over seas such as China to produce their products at a lower cost. As entailed in the letter from a man born in China, many citizens on these countries resort to factory labor to support themselves to escape other sources on income such as prostitution. Without these corporations usage of oversea sweatshops these employees would be forced to return to self-demeaning jobs such as these. However, does the mere fact that overseas factory labor is allowing these people to support themselves and their families provide moral justification for the poor work conditions, and low wages that sweatshop labor provides? German philosopher Immanuel Kant would argue that there must be changes made in the politics of sweatshops to improve there conditions. Using his idea of the “Categorical Imperative” and treating people as “valuable in themselves” Kant would not completely take away the opportunity for these people to support themselves working in factories but make it a more humane system. Utilitarian philosophy would identify the good that these sweatshops are providing for the people overseas, and recognize the harm that could be caused......

Words: 1475 - Pages: 6


...should we be turning attention to women in Bangladesh at a time when life is so grim for women in the UK? The 2012 budget is set to hit women much harder than men by hacking away at the social services and benefits that women (particularly the poorest) rely on. I would argue that we must keep our focus global, because the sexism underlying the labour market in Bangladesh, from which firms like Nike profit, is the same sexism that ensures George Osborne’s austerity measures will hit women hardest. Assumptions about women’s roles as carers run right into the heart of the current global economic system. It is a system that relies on women’s unpaid caring labour, by seeking a society where government and corporations refuse responsibility for human need and the caring work it requires. While Nike sources from factories that refuse to pay a living wage that can sustain life, and while they fire pregnant women, the UK government is demolishing the hard-won social services and benefits that recognise how society as a whole is responsible for caring labour, since society as a whole fundamentally relies on it. The budget’s proposals to means test child benefit (not to mention Osborne’s vision of a deregulated labour market) are particularly stark rejections of responsibility for caring and reproductive labour. In both the UK and Bangladesh care is being shifted into the domestic sphere to be picked up by women. Today’s protest is not asking for boycott. Neither does it aim to......

Words: 1294 - Pages: 6


...Hiromi Ochi ENG112 Professor Ashley Farmer Unit 2 Essay Sweatshops and the benefits of Fair Trade The great Abraham Lincoln once said, “Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally.” In many countries worldwide, people are being exploited on a daily basis by factories around the world known as sweatshops. A sweatshop is a term used to describe a working environment, commonly factories manufacturing textile goods that are deemed dangerous due to poor working conditions. Workers who work at these sweatshops often endure sexual, physical and mental abuse, who work long unreasonable hours with no leave, lacking any health care benefits whatsoever for meager wage. These sweatshops often employ the usage of child labor and women, as they are easier to control. Today, my research essay will be on sweatshops and how the benefits of Fair trade and anti-sweatshop activism in the long run, can be beneficial. I will explore the poor and harsh working conditions of these workers, how working in a sweatshop can affect their health both mentally and physically, how child labor is being employed in these sweatshops and how women and children are mainly the ones being exploited in these sweatshops. More often than not, many Americans assume that these acts are not ongoing today, and are oblivious to the ways we as consumers, are actually supporting these organizations unknowingly. Authorities should......

Words: 2655 - Pages: 11

Boycotting Sweatshops

...Boycotting Sweatshops Name: Guangzhen Lyu Student Number: 300772748 Professor’s Name: Catherine Boote Date of submission: Nov 28, 2014 Boycotting Sweatshops! The sweatshop is like a juicer exploiting cheap labor. At present, going with the development of economy, cost of manufacture is increasing rapidly; many companies are building factories in developing countries. Because it can help them to reduce the production costs. Unfortunately, some factories are sweatshops. And what is sweatshop labour like? Sweatshop laborers generally work 60-80 hours per week and are not paid enough money to put food on the table; they sometimes receive only pennies a day for their labor. Often, the sweatshop environment is unsafe – workers are harassed, intimidated, forced to work overtime, and made to work in dangerous and unhealthy environments, even while sick. Workers handle toxic chemical paints, solvents, and glues with their bare hands. (Michael Conlan, 2010) And the workers of sweatshops are working in terrible working environment, enduring the huge working pressure, and losing legal rights. One of the reasons why do we against sweatshops is they usually with the uncomfortable and unsafe environment. Firstly, sweatshops can......

Words: 895 - Pages: 4


...Sweatshops are immoral The vast majority of Americans are shocked by reports of brutal conditions in overseas factories. The U.S. itself has a proud practice of unions and human rights groups that work to prevent such abuses like child labor, refusal to pay overtime pay, exposure to poisonous chemicals, and unsafe working environments. Every day, people from other countries come to America for a chance to work hard in return for better treatment, higher paying jobs than the jobs they can find in their native country. Consumer demands affect a company’s business decision in many cases. Fashion being so fast paced with many companies competing for the global dollars. Every company has cut prices which in turn has them searching for ways to reduce labor costs. Unfortunately the first thing companies do is outsource and turn to sweatshops for cheap fast labor in order to make a profit and to be competitive in the market. Different ethical perspectives guide ethical decision making in the right direction, wrong direction, and walking a fine line direction. Some companies use ethical decision making as a tool to keep their company out of trouble by using proper moral judgment. While other companies could care less if they are being ethical. The ones with unethical practices will do anything to make a dollar. There are also companies that walk a fine line when it comes to sweatshops. They usually know what regulations they can bend but not break. All in all the last two...

Words: 360 - Pages: 2


...Sweatshop is Conflicts With the Moral Standards PMP 400 Quan Zhang ( Lyla) Royal Roads University Elvira Perrella March 9, 2015 Sweatshop is Conflicts With the Moral Standards Green, B., & Norton, S. (2011). Reading. In. W, Anne & M. Laura ( Eds.), Essay essentials with readings (pp. 336- 341). Toronto, ON: Nelson Education Ltd. In the article, before the research, like many people, the author’s attitude was old, but after the research, the author’s attitude changed. The author chose the country of Bangladeshi to illustrate her point that working in a sweatshop can be a positive experience for women in developing countries by focusing primarily on one country. First, she argued that sweatshops offer jobs for women and give them the opportunity to improve the quality of their lives. Second, women can experience some independence about managing their finances and choosing their marriages although they have the small income. In this article, the author used others’ opinion, details and facts to develop her topic. The data and cases were enough to prove the argument, and the evidence was very creditable and believable. Although this article argued in the opposite way with me, it gave my article a new perspective about the sweatshop labors. What's more, the author gave me a good evidence about counterargument, which work at the sweatshop is better than no jobs. Then I can refutation this counterargument that the sweatshop conflicts with the......

Words: 1017 - Pages: 5

Labor Practices - Sweatshops

...Labor Practices - Sweatshops Astrid Vargas PHL/320 April 6, 2015 Jennifer Stephens A “sweatshop” is defined by the United States Department of Labor as a factory that violates two or more labor laws. The use of questionable labor practices, popularly knows as “sweatshop labor”, is widespread in the production of consumer goods (Paharia, 2013). Major international brands such as Nike and Apple are some of the high-profile companies that have been exposed to such labor abuses. Most members of society automatically consider sweatshops as an unacceptable source of labor because they are known for subjecting employees to dangerous and unsanitary labor conditions. Research organizations have consistently found that while economists and activists disagree about the costs and benefits of such practices, consumers have a strong preference to purchase products made without sweatshop labor. Mostly because consumers are concerned and often disturbed when labor abuses occur but the demand for products that guarantee favorable working conditions remains low. Unfortunately, there are a variety of reasons that explain why this is an ongoing, conflicting situation. While surveys and research suggest that people do not endorse the use of sweatshop labor, actions speak louder than words. If consumers really cared as they stated, there would be more demand for sweatshop free products and companies to profit from such products. Consumers may not really disapprove of these practices and......

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Nike Sweatshop

...Instructor: Eric Baker Date: December 12, 2012 As one of the leading brands in athletic wear, it would seem that Nike would be in the frontlines promoting human rights in the factories where their products are made. There have been many reports of workers in Nike factories facing poverty, harassment, dismissal and violent intimidation (Wazir, 2001). The motto of “Just Do It” does not seem applicable to the company itself. Despite numerous reports and audits, Nike has yet to take action against human rights violations by their suppliers. In 1998, the CEO of Nike, Phil Knight promised six main improvements in conditions at Nike factories around the world. These were: all Nike factories would meet US air quality standards, the minimum age would be raised to 18 for workers in Nike shoe factories and 16 for those in clothing factories, Nike would include non-governmental organizations in factory monitoring, and the company would make inspection results public, Nike would expand its worker education program, with free secondary-school equivalent courses, a loan program would be expanded to benefit 4,000 families in Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan and Thailand and research on responsible business practices would be funded at four universities (Wazir, 2001). Despite such high aims by the company, there are still reports of human rights violations in factories manufacturing Nike products. In 2005, the company sent auditors to the factories to evaluate conditions of working......

Words: 2116 - Pages: 9

Are Sweatshops Good or Bad?

...working conditions has caused people to form groups to make standards for every country. These groups are fighting against sweatshops and fighting for labor right on behaves of the poor. A couple of the larger groups are, The Institute for Global Labour and Human Rights, The International Labor Rights Forum formally non-as the National Labor Committee. While there are people fighting against sweatshops, there are also people fighting for sweatshops and educating people on the impact that they have in the communities and in the countries. So what is a sweatshop? According to Global Exchange (2015) sweatshops can defined in many different ways: “The US Department of Labor, a sweatshop is any factory that violates more than one of the fundamental US labor laws, which include paying a minimum wage and keeping a time card, paying overtime, and paying on time. The Union of Needle trades Industrial and Textile Employees (UNITE), the US garment workers union, says any factory that does not respect workers’ right to organize an independent union is a sweatshop. Global Exchange and other corporate accountability groups in the anti-sweatshop movement would add to this definition any factory that does not pay its workers a living wage—that is, a wage that can support the basic needs of a small family.” What countries and companies are being affected by these anti-sweatshop groups and what is considered a “living wage”? A few of the countries that are affected are: Thailand, the......

Words: 1406 - Pages: 6


...Are Sweatshops Beneficial? January 22, 2016 Situation Analysis What I generally know about sweatshops is they are a horrible place to work. They are the lowest of the low. You work long hours for barely any money. For my audience, being my instructor and fellow classmates, I would assume they know at least that much, more or less. For the instructor’s expectations of my paper would include a couple of things to me. First and foremost a complete understanding of the chosen core reading. Within that I will be able to educate my audience more in depth of this subject being sweatshops. Another instructor expectation would to do all that within a well-organized, proper formatted paper. As for my audience expectations I expect they would to be properly informed on this subject before I put my personal opinion in the paper. I find this subject to be especially relevant to today’s world because we are affected by it daily. A lot of the mainstream products we have and use are made by companies that have sweatshops overseas. Most people would be interested in this because of what we buy can have an effect on the workers. Even though we don’t see it first-hand here in Indianapolis, Indiana, it does matter us as a human being. With this paper I hope to enlighten my fellow classmates on the core reading. Since the paper is more pro-sweatshops I will give some of the cons to it as my response. I want this paper to help educate the reader so they can make a more informed opinion on...

Words: 1097 - Pages: 5

Are Sweatshops Evil?

...It is no secret that sweatshops are horrible areas of employment. The prevalence of child labor, poor working conditions, and little pay has given sweatshops notoriety amongst the economic and political world. However, when placed in the context of the respective areas sweatshops reside in; sweatshops take on a much more favorable form. Sweatshops arise in poor areas around the world, and this actually plays a major factor when looking at the positive aspects of sweatshops. These aspects include a greater source of income than other local jobs, a better alternative mean of making money, and a positive impact upon women in poor countries. Sweatshops are infamous for providing low wages, but when analyzed in the context of other employment industries in countries where sweatshops are common, sweatshop wages are actually a steady source of income. For example, ninety percent of countries that contain sweatshops produce income that is larger than the overall average income of that respective country. In some cases, up to half of sweatshop countries yield earnings up to three times the national average (Powell). In terms of income, sweatshops allow a superior means of making money than other jobs. Any movement that tries to prohibit sweatshops has to realize that the removal of sweatshops discards a remarkable source of money that citizens desperately need and cannot get anywhere else. The growing movement towards abolishing sweatshops not only removes a decent source of pay,......

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Sweatshop and Globalization

...economies. Rate of trade within the countries have increased with the removal of trade barriers. Trade protection policy is made which protect the trade. Another force that drives globalization will be the enhanced technology in this new era. Digitalisation and invention of technology at a lower cost have massively integrated national markets. No doubt that it has opened new and better area of expansion to the multinational companies. For example, Mc Donald has seized the chance to expand itself and establish its name in the entire world by using the influence of social media. 2.0 Other Causes of Sweatshop Countries such as China and India are commonly known for their high poverty rate compared to other countries around the world. Also, we need to highlight that the amount of sweatshops in these two countries are fairly high as well. The cause of the existence of sweatshop is mainly due to capitalism. According to a graduate student from University of Denver Justin Guay, labourers today are economic terms, short term, and capital investments with high rates of return. In 1995, Newman, a reporter has visited one of the factory in Pakistan that produce soccer balls to be sold in Europe. During the visit, he noticed the child labour are being treated inhumanly and do not pay them sufficient wages. It’s such a shame that corporations like these are making profit from the children’s hard work. Other causes will be the high unemployment rate and low level of education of the......

Words: 1446 - Pages: 6

Sweatshops in America

...Sweatshops in America Having a globalized economy provides easy access to just about anything we want or need; however we almost never know where these items come from or how they were produced. You don’t need to go to a third world nation to find a sweatshop as they are very prevalent in California and New York. Sweatshops exist because large retailers don’t produce their own clothing. They hire manufactures to coordinate production, and the manufactures typically enter into contracts that require quick turnaround. Sweatshops in America produce a big portion of the shirts, dresses, blouses, and skirts on the shelves of big American retailers. Retailers often claim they are unaware of the conditions in which their clothes are produced. The retailer reaps the benefits of this labor; without, taking responsibility of the cheap production. Sweatshops are back in America because in recent decades, many garment manufacturers have moved overseas and unions have become less powerful. Devastating budget cuts severely limited the U.S. Department of Labor policing of garment factories. There are now only 800 wage, and hour inspectors employed by the Department of Labor. They inspect six million work sites of all kinds in the USA making it easy to avoid inspection. It is estimated that 4,500 of New York’s 7,000 garment factories are sweatshops. These sweatshops are often mobile operations, making them even more difficult to regulate. The only equipment that is really......

Words: 972 - Pages: 4

Sweatshops Press Release

...ABC co. 253 Broadway New York, NY 10007 Phone- 212-577-7020 Contact: John Doe FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tel. 212-555-999 Cell Phone: 347-852-9555 Email: New policy to improve sweatshops work conditions and labor ABC co is proud to release a new policy to improve our work environment and labor in the sweatshops. To prevent any problems with the sweatshop we are releasing a new policy. The new policy will features strict supervision, safer environment, and provide enough income for the employees. Although there are many sweatshops, ABC co intends to offer more, having a new policy means safer work environment. In order to commit to this new policy the company supplier has to agree to it and sign a contract. This way ABC co will know what is going to be done to the factories. This new policy will have an impact on all of us not just ABC co. The consumer would be pleased with the products they purchase comes from a safe work environment. The employees will know there will be no forced labor and they will have their rights. We as a company would like to improve our work environment since most of the sweatshops work conditions are really in bad conditions. We want to have our reputation as an excellent company. We know by releasing this new policy will make a change to our company. This would be great opportunity for the company to get known as a company that have a safe work environment and treat the......

Words: 588 - Pages: 3