Free Essay

Mary Schapiro and Leadership

In: Business and Management

Submitted By davidmsn
Words 3266
Pages 14
Mary Schapiro
In her role at the SEC, Mary Schapiro was known as one of the world's most powerful female regulators. She was named chair in the midst of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. As chairman, she helped strengthen and revitalize the agency by overseeing a more rigorous enforcement program and shaping new rules for Wall Street. During her tenure, the agency's work force brought about a record number of enforcement actions and achieved significant regulatory reform to protect investors. Schapiro leaves behind an agency that has regained its footing, stature, and morale following desultory leadership under its previous two chairmen and its embarrassing lack of action preceding the financial crisis. Under Schapiro, the SEC, which is usually thought to be the most prominent and important financial regulatory body in the country, brought a huge number of enforcement actions against financial institutions. Her job was to assess what went wrong and to ensure it didn’t happen again. During four years as SEC chairman, Schapiro presided over one of the busiest rule-making agendas in the SEC's history, during which the agency also brought a record number of enforcement actions, and executed a comprehensive restructuring program to improve protections for investors. Upon her departure, President Obama praised her leadership, saying the SEC became stronger and the financial system "safer and better able to serve the American people-thanks in large part to Schapiro's hard work." Change Management

Change management is designed to ensure the effective transition of an organisation and its people from the current to future states, and in so doing support the realisation of business benefits. In the context of strategy, it is the realisation of the strategic plan. Change management is about effectively leading and managing individuals, teams, and the organisation to successfully adopt the changes needed to achieve required or desired business results. Success in Organisational Change Follows Recognisable Patterns – Kotter’s 8 Steps

Harvard Business School Professor John Kotter is well known for identifying a pattern for leading successful organizational change. Yet, we cannot be sure that the President, members of Congress, and key Federal Reserve, Department of the Treasury, and SEC personnel (including Chairman Schapiro) are familiar with this work and with other similar guidance from change leadership literature. And even if some or all of the change agents impacting a restructuring of the SEC are familiar with this work, it is unclear whether any of those change agents are consciously using this learning and incorporating useful elements from Kotter's books into the SEC reorganization process. Studies of organizational change have shed significant light on the elements of a successful reform effort. Leaders effectuating reform at the SEC do not have to "reinvent the wheel" as they initiate, manage, and institutionalize organizational change. Kotter's model is organized into eight stages designed to address eight observed mistakes made in efforts for organizational change: "establishing a sense of urgency"; "creating the guiding coalition"; "developing a vision and strategy"; "communicating the change vision"; "empowering broad-based action"; generating short-term wins"; "consolidating gains and producing more change"; and "anchoring new approaches in the culture." Each stage has identifiable characteristics.

1. Establishing a Sense of Urgency
"Visible crises can be enormously helpful in catching people's attention and pushing up urgency levels." To be sure, the SEC has experienced visible crises over the past few years. Admissions of significant failures at the SEC extend back over more than two years' time and cover multiple areas of SEC operations. "The natural superiority of the U.S. model for securities regulation is no longer an article of faith, and the credibility of the SEC as a financial regulator has never been lower." although the SEC has long been "the crown jewel of the financial regulatory infrastructure," recent developments have called that characterization into question. The SEC has been the target of relentless criticism ranging from claims that it mishandled derivatives regulation, oversight of securities firms, and market risk, to assertions of delays and blunders and possible industry capture at the Division of Enforcement. These criticisms followed the Treasury Department's Blueprint of Financial Regulation-released in March 2008-that criticized the SEC's approach to regulation as obsolete and proposed a plan of regulatory consolidation that would effectively lead to the agency's demise. Most recently, the revelation that the SEC failed to discover a $50 billion Ponzi scheme at Madoff Investment Securities, despite having received allegations of wrongdoing for over a decade, suggests fundamental weaknesses in its core enforcement operations.

To be successful at organizational change, however, a change leader must use the crisis to shake up the organization. This requires that the change leader "remove sources of complacency or minimize their impact" and take actions that are "bold or even risky." Kotter uses the concept of fire in a building as a proxy for crisis in an organization, writing that "conducting business as usual is very difficult if the building seems to be on fire."Interestingly, Chairman Schapiro invoked fire imagery in comments to reporters as she made changes to SEC operations shortly after taking office. Moreover, in a recent speech, Chairman Schapiro noted the rapid pace of change at the SEC over the preceding year: I know that change is hard because within our agency we have been engaged in some of the most significant change in decades. When I arrived at the agency last January, we began a process of assessing our operations and determined we could do better. We determined that we needed to change. And that is the path we have chosen. The personnel changes instituted at the SEC may be seen as examples of sweeping change. The discomfort and discontent of the SEC staff in response to the personnel changes may be evidence of the brash nature of these personnel changes. Kotter's work predicts this kind of reaction. He notes that "bold moves that reduce complacency tend to increase conflict and to create anxiety, at least at first."

2. Creating the Guiding Coalition
Leading change is not a solitary task. Because major change is so difficult to accomplish, a powerful force is required to sustain the process. No one individual, not even a monarch-like CEO, is ever able to develop the right vision, communicate it to large numbers of people, eliminate all the key obstacles, generate short-term wins, lead and manage dozens of change projects, and anchor new approaches deep in the organization's culture. Instead, what is required is a strong leadership team-a team "with the right composition and sufficient trust among members." In terms of composition, "four key characteristics" are important: "position power"- the entire group who will be charged with making progress in areas of needed change, "expertise," "credibility," and "leadership." Trust is borne of activities that "create . . . mutual understanding, respect, and caring." Trust is important because it can lead to the effective creation of a "common goal" or "shared objective." Chairman Schapiro has changed the leadership team at the SEC. We must question, however, whether the team has the right characteristics and the requisite trust. Certainly, the credentials of the SEC Commissioners are quite impressive in terms of expertise, credibility, and leadership skills. Chairman Schapiro has put a premium on attracting to the SEC people with an expansive set of experiences and skills. Moreover, the published remarks of new leaders in the Division of Enforcement-people with position power-are impressive in their indication of a collective change momentum. New leaders continue to emerge, making the membership of the guiding coalition unsettled and unclear. The executives who ignited the transformations from good to great did not first figure out where to drive the bus and then get people to take it there. No, they first got the right people on the bus (and the wrong people off the bus) and then figured out where to drive it. In general, public information sources are not detailed enough to enable a comprehensive assessment of the suitability of the composition of Chairman Schapiro's guiding coalition. For example, according to Kotter, "you need both management and leadership skills on the guiding coalition, and they must work in tandem, teamwork style."He offers matrices that illustrate optimal compositions. Publicly available information does not enable us to determine whether or not the SEC guiding coalition has the optimal balance of management and leadership skills. Only as the exact identity of the leadership team emerges and the team takes concerted and coordinated action will we be able to evaluate its composition. As difficult as it is for us to appraise the team's composition, it is more difficult for us to assess whether the guiding coalition has the required trust. Although I have not found evidence that ostensible members of the SEC guiding coalition have engaged in team-building exercises or attended a retreat at which intra-group trust may have been engendered, the SEC's recent self-assessment' may be a sign that mutual trust is being promoted throughout the agency. As new people are identified for inclusion on the change leadership team, they will need to be effectively brought into the "circle of trust."

3. Developing a Vision and Strategy
To achieve successful organizational change, a leader needs to have both vision and a strategy to implement that vision. "Vision refers to a picture of the future with some implicit or explicit commentary on why people should strive to create that future." Vision serves to channel change in a particular direction and incentivizes and coordinates change in that direction. Chairman Schapiro seems to understand this aspect of change leadership, and she also seems to be incorporating it into the SEC's operations. Her vision for a reformed SEC refocuses the SEC's activities on one of the key policy underpinnings of the federal securities laws: investor protection Another lesson I have learned is to have a vision about where you want to take your organization and stick to your principles in getting there. Principles are not ideologies. They are different. Maybe it's a question of degree. Maybe to some it's semantics. But as I see it, unlike ideologies, principles don't seem to demand a particular answer to every problem that emerges.

We've seen how strict adherence to ideology played out over the last decade in the financial arena. "Free market ideology" together with rapidly changing technology, globalization and many other accidental causes led too many of us to forget hard-learned lessons from past crises and abandon basic common sense. Principles, on the other hand, help frame a question, an issue or a problem. Having a principle might highlight tensions and trade-offs of particular choices, but rarely do they force you to choose between a good solution and a worldview. For me at the SEC, my main principle is putting investors first. And, I try to stay focused on that every day. And the goal is to build an SEC that is deeply expert, nimble, and aggressive-that gives investors confidence. In fact, as Bob Glauber can attest, I have a sign posted on my door that says "How does it help investors?" It's a simple question, but it guides all that I do at the SEC. And, all those who enter my office understand that is the prism through which we will consider all issues. It doesn't necessarily dictate the outcome of every issue that lands on my desk-because there are many solutions to any problem that could aid investors. But, the principle helps to shape our thinking and steers us in the right path. Vision is implemented through strategy. "Without vision, strategy making can be a much more contentious activity.... Even more so, without good vision, a clever strategy or a logical plan can rarely inspire the kind of action needed to produce major change."' Chairman Schapiro's vision has guided structural and operational change at the SEC as well as substantive rulemaking. Some credit her clearly conceived vision and the related rapidly employed strategy for saving the SEC from more significant structural or operational change.

4. Communicating the Change Vision
According to Kotter, the larger the audience for the change vision, the more powerful it may be. A great vision can serve a useful purpose even if it is understood by just a few key people. But the real power of a vision is unleashed only when most of those involved in an enterprise or activity have a common understanding of its goals and direction. That shared sense of a desirable future can help motivate and coordinate the kinds of actions that create transformations.' A leader must be careful to communicate the change vision broadly, frequently (repeatedly), and consistently. The message conveying the vision must be direct, clear, simple, and geared to its targeted audiences. Metaphors, analogies, examples, and florid prose may be helpful in this regard. The means of conveying the message should be varied: oral and written, large forum and small group, and through words and actions. Finally, to ensure understanding, the communication of the vision should be a two-way street, involving both give and take as well as conveying and listening." Chairman Schapiro has engaged in significant public speaking in which she has regularly and repeatedly informed and reminded the SEC staff and various elements of the public about the SEC's recommitment to investor protection and the linkage of that vision to structural and operational changes at the SEC. Chairman Schapiro regularly appeared before congressional committees and subcommittees, and she has communicated her vision in these arenas as well. She used memorable analogies, examples, and words to convey the SEC's organizational change message.' Evidencing an appreciation for two-way communication, soon after her appointment, Chairman Schapiro took action in response to staff suggestions that enforcement efforts against corporate violators of the securities laws were too difficult. Moreover, the self-assessment process and related ongoing staff communications are evidence of two-way communication about the structural and operational changes that have been taking place at the SEC. And Chairman Schapiro has continued to express belief in capturing a variety of viewpoints in decision-making.

5. Empowering Employees for Broad-Based Action
To implement the leader's vision, employees need to be able to take action. This may mean clearing away structural barriers, skill deficiencies, systemic obstacles, and supervisory impediments that may forestall effective employee participation in change efforts. Many of the structural and operational reforms implemented by Chairman Schapiro appear to be designed to empower SEC staff members for action that carries forward the change vision of the SEC. The efforts of Chairman Schapiro to listen and respond to staff concerns about unnecessary enforcement hurdles are examples of initiatives to streamline structure. In addition, the restructuring of the Division of Enforcement is geared to clear structural barricades to effective enforcement efforts.' The decision to retain staff with "non-traditional skills" and the implementation of new staff training are examples of efforts to remedy skill deficits. Human resources and information systems have been or are being improved in response to deficiencies identified in the SEC's self-assessment and the OIG's investigation, report, and recommendations. In the Division of Enforcement, supervisory positions are being eliminated, supervisory personnel are being replaced, supervisory responsibilities are being realigned, and supervisory attitudes that may have impeded investigations are being corrected.'

6. Generating Short-Term Wins
Because the organizational change process is slow and constituents can be impatient, it is important for a change leader to accomplish certain limited objectives in the short term. Major change takes time, sometimes lots of time. Zealous believers will often stay the course no matter what happens. Most of the rest of us expect to see convincing evidence that all the effort is paying off. Nonbelievers have even higher standards of proof. They want to see clear data indicating that the changes are working and that the change process isn't absorbing so many resources in the short term as to endanger the organization. To be effective in sustaining organizational change efforts, short-term wins must be "both visible and unambiguous."' They also must be "clearly related to the change effort." And in an effective change effort, they are planned, not accidental.' SEC Chairman Schapiro accomplished some highly publicized early wins after her appointment was confirmed. In particular, she swiftly moved to remove perceived barriers to enforcement of the securities laws against public companies. She publicly promoted these changes, and they were picked up by the news media.' These efforts generated support in and outside the SEC. The achievement of these short-term wins on a staggered but consistent basis has kept the SEC's structural and operational reforms in front of the SEC's staff and the public, building consensus around and momentum for the SEC's self-initiated reform efforts and distracting attention from more substantial externally generated suggestions for change.

7. Consolidating Gains and Producing More Change
The long-term time horizon for organizational change not only makes short-term wins advisable, but also may make early declarations of victory problematic. It is important that the sense of urgency created by the change leaders is sustained for the long haul. Short-term wins are essential to keep momentum going, but the celebration of the wins can be lethal if urgency is lost. With complacency up, the forces of tradition can sweep back in with remarkable force and speed. Although a rapid, consistent pace of change at the SEC was sustained over the first fifteen months of reform, Chairman Schapiro as well as other SEC change leaders, needed to maintain the change momentum by continuing to introduce reforms on a regular basis. Having gone so far, the SEC could have lost all of the gains it had made in organizational change merely by relaxing into complacency. "Until changed practices attain a new equilibrium and have been driven into the culture, they can be very fragile."' To reach that equilibrium, in addition to engaging in more and continuous change, the SEC should bring in additional change agents, continue to foster leadership from its senior managers, recruit and nurture project management and leadership from lower ranks in the hierarchy, and identify and decrease or eliminate unnecessary internal structural and operational interconnections that often make change efforts more complex.' These types of efforts in change management are difficult and pervasive.

8. Anchoring New Approaches in the Culture
Finally, to prevent regression, change leaders must address and resolve any incompatibilities between the changes that have been made and the organization's culture-friction in the group's system of behavioural norms and shared values. This is not as easy as it may sound. These norms and values may apply to the organization as a whole or only to certain parts of the organization, and it is important to achieve compatibility on both levels. Moreover, culture is change-resistant and nearly invisible. Yet, the failure to address inconsistencies between a change effort and the prevailing culture can undo years of reform.' Accordingly, it was important that Chairman Schapiro understood the applicable behavioural norms and shared values of the SEC and the Enforcement Division and their respective relevant cultural sub-groups as they continue to reform the SEC and the Enforcement Division. Because the core vision of investor protection should not be entirely inconsistent with the SEC's culture (in whole or in pertinent part), these and other change leaders at the SEC should be able to "graft the new practices onto the old roots while killing off the inconsistent pieces." The important thing will be for the SEC's change leaders to continue to remember the organization's heritage and link it to the organization's new and ongoing operations and objectives.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Mary Key

...Perfil de la compañía El 13 de Septiembre de 1963, Mary Kay Ash funda Mary Kay Inc., cumpliendo con su sueño de brindar a las mujeres la oportunidad de realizarse profesional y económicamente, sin descuidar su dedicación por la familia. La Compañía se funda sobre importantes principios y valores, los cuales consisten en la Regla de Oro: "Tratar a los demás como deseas ser tratado", y la filosofía del balance de las prioridades de la vida, que son primero Dios, segundo la familia y tercero la Carrera. Con más de 40 años, Mary Kay figura entre las Compañías más importantes de la industria cosmética, colocándose en Estados Unidos, como líder en la categoría de Cuidado Básico de la Piel y Maquillaje Glamour. En la actualidad se cuenta con más de 1;600,000 Consultoras de Belleza Independientes localizadas en más de 30 mercados mundiales. En México, Mary Kay inicia sus operaciones un 13 de Diciembre de 1988 en la ciudad de Monterrey, Nuevo León; Mary Kay Cosmetics de México S.A. de C.V. se ha distinguido entre las subsidiarias internacionales por tener el liderazgo en ventas e iniciación. Nuestra Fuerza de Ventas está conformada por más de 175,000 Consultoras de Belleza Independientes en la República Mexicana. Vida y legado A lo largo de la historia, han existido muchos líderes de negocio exitosos, pero ninguno tan especial como la legendaria Mary Kay Ash, fundadora de Mary Kay Inc. A pesar de que esta Presidenta Emérita falleció en el 2001, sus palabras sabias......

Words: 5186 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

Mary Rowlandson

...Mary Rowlandson’s story, The Sovereignty and Goodness of God, discusses her experiences when a group of Natives capture her and her family from their village in the New World. Her story is based on her beliefs and reasoning of why she thinks she went through the events she endured. Mary believed that the reasoning of this event was to test her trust and faith in God and her overall strength. Mary endured so much pain and suffering, but she never let her unfortunate experiences oversee the grace of God. It was tough to see the will of God while surrounded by what she saw as savages, but she kept her faith. She recognized God was her guidance and did not rely on any other being but Him. Mary shared the word of God with her union by using scripture; not only to tell others His word, but also to prove that she was walking with God. She believed that every time she quoted the Bible, not only was she becoming closer to God, but she was also making herself feel better. When Mary was put into a dangerous position, she showed a belief that God is an amazing being that rewards Christians as a result of their devotion to Him. She also showed that commitment and faithfulness to God was part of the Puritans everyday lifestyle. She may have lost a daughter and other family members, but she never gave up on her faith in God; instead she used her tragedies to spread the word of God and to please Him. Her religious beliefs assisted her throughout her captivity and she......

Words: 370 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Mary Wollstonecraft

...sociologist is Mary Wollstonecraft, whose sociological work largely transformed subsequent studies, formation, ideologies and inclinations of the society towards women, education and human rights (Browning et al, 1999). This essay is going to critically evaluate the works of Mary Wollstonecraft as well as a critical analysis of the socialist contribution to the sturdy of the society. The essay will also evaluate the impacts of the sociologist’s ideas on current sociological studies regarding the society. Discussion Background information Mary Wollstonecraft was born on 27th April 1759 and died on 10th September 1797. She was considered a prolific writer, a staunch advocate for women rights and a philosopher. Mary has wrote various educational works and written several vindications. The writer’s work has significantly influenced contemporary studies on the society and sociology as well. Her fight for women rights and women engagement in education has significantly shaped theories and studies about the society (Ferguson & Janet, 1984). Contribution to the study of society Mary’s work has significantly contributed to the study of society. The sociologist advocates for the full involvement and engagement of young children in the education sector. In her book titled “Thoughts on the Education of daughters” and “original stories from real life”, Mary advocates for the importance of educating children into the middle class philosophy (Wardle, 1966). Mary postulated......

Words: 1650 - Pages: 7

Free Essay


...Accession of Mary Mary’s accession generally accepted and favoured by the English people, most likely because she was a legitimate successor There was the issue with Lady Jane Grey – Northumberland attempted to make his daughter-in-law, Lady Jane Grey, the successor after Edward. She was Queen for nine days, but was deposed and Mary carried on as legitimate successor. Faction Mary was determined to fill the council with loyal people, but she couldn’t prevent all rivalries! = Gardiner vs. Paget. The rivalry emerged over Mary’s marriage issue. Gardiner proposed that Mary should marry Courtnay, and Paget argued she should marry Phillip of Spain Some were also sceptical of some of her policies, such as the effectiveness of the burning of protestants. However, despite some disagreements with her policies, she managed to obtain agreement for 3 major steps: the full return to Rome in religion, her marriage to the heir of the Spanish throne and the declaration of war on France Faction was much less of a problem in Mary’s reign than her predecessors, with a greater sense of continuity and solidarity among most councillors. Marriage The first question on everybody’s lips was “Who should marry Mary?” Edward Courtney vs. Phillip of Spain Why Phillip? He was a Catholic He was Spanish, and Mary was half Spanish after all! He had more political experience as he had already been regent in the Netherlands Spain has money and owns most of Europe and the Americas It would......

Words: 308 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Mary Schapiro and Leadership

...Mary Schapiro In her role at the SEC, Mary Schapiro was known as one of the world's most powerful female regulators. She was named chair in the midst of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. As chairman, she helped strengthen and revitalize the agency by overseeing a more rigorous enforcement program and shaping new rules for Wall Street. During her tenure, the agency's work force brought about a record number of enforcement actions and achieved significant regulatory reform to protect investors. Schapiro leaves behind an agency that has regained its footing, stature, and morale following desultory leadership under its previous two chairmen and its embarrassing lack of action preceding the financial crisis. Under Schapiro, the SEC, which is usually thought to be the most prominent and important financial regulatory body in the country, brought a huge number of enforcement actions against financial institutions. Her job was to assess what went wrong and to ensure it didn’t happen again. During four years as SEC chairman, Schapiro presided over one of the busiest rule-making agendas in the SEC's history, during which the agency also brought a record number of enforcement actions, and executed a comprehensive restructuring program to improve protections for investors. Upon her departure, President Obama praised her leadership, saying the SEC became stronger and the financial system "safer and better able to serve the American people-thanks in large part to......

Words: 3264 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Mary Schapiro Cpa117 Case

...下去。 本文是从2013年9月发行INTHEBLACK杂志。 Mary Schapiro will step down next month as U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission chairman, turning over the reins to Commissioner Elisse Walter in a move industry observers say will bring little change at the agency. Schapiro, 57, who took the SEC’s top job in 2009 as it reeled amid public rebukes for failing to rein in Wall Street abuses, will leave the post Dec. 14, the agency said in a statement today. President Barack Obama named Walter to succeed Schapiro as the SEC navigates a flood of mandates from the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act and pursues efforts to overhaul regulation of money-market mutual funds and high-frequency trading. “Elisse Walter is a safe choice,” James Angel, a visiting finance professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business, said in a telephone interview. “She has the experience, she has credibility and she hasn’t offended too many people. With all the other problems the administration has to deal with, with the fiscal cliff and everything else, the last thing they need is a major confirmation battle.” Walter, 62, who served as interim chairman before Schapiro took over, will step in again as the agency works to implement Dodd-Frank measures such as the so-called Volcker rule limits on banks’ trading and tries to overhaul the money-market mutual fund industry after Schapiro’s initial effort ended in failure. The agency has also struggled under Schapiro’s leadership to enact rules for implementing the...

Words: 1620 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Mary Schapiro

...investor protection and market integrity. Mission: Restoring SEC’s vigour and credibility within the financial regulatory Community. Value: vigor, credibility, high functioning, agile, intelligent, commitment, integrity. Goal: Financial Customer Internal process Learning and growth Mary set up three strategic themes/priorities to pursue • Operational levers, • People, • and organization levers that assisted in achieving those options. Three priorities a) Assessing what needed to be done within the organization (internal assessment) [ First get the right people and then lead the strategy ] 1. Schapiro recruited analysts and people who understood trading, market structure, corporate governance and a whole range of skill sets that would be important for the future. 2. She recruited people from Wall Street to restructure the SEC’s largest division – enforcement and examination - “to make this regulator more responsive, more agile and clever and capable of seeing around corner to figure out where the next problems were before they hit us in the face”. 3. Schapiro leveraged the SEC talent by bringing in new invigorating leadership. 4. Talented staffs on its books were sent to qualify as certified fraud examiners; a whole layer of management was removed and was reassigned to the front line 5. Specialized units was set up to focus on areas of concern such as corrupt foreign practices, insider trading, market......

Words: 1707 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Mary Schapiro's Job Was to Fix the Sec. She Didn't Stop There.

...erupting across the globe. The US Government snapped into crisis mode and took the extraordinary move of handing the ¬financial sector a multibillion-dollar bailout. But still the economy shook. Enter Mary Schapiro, a career regulator, to rescue a languishing SEC. Her job was to assess what went wrong and to ensure it didn’t happen again. ¬ Schapiro was appointed by US President Barak Obama as the 29th chairman of the SEC and its first female chair – though that fact, she says, got lost in the enormity of the task assigned to her. “When I joined in June 2009, my thought was of restoring the agency’s vigour and credibility within the financial regulatory community,” Schapiro told INTHEBLACK during a visit to Sydney recently. “I understood how really critical it was to the success of our economy to have an agency that was high functioning, agile and intelligent, and committed to investor protection and market integrity. “I think I had about a day as opposed to 100 days,” she says of the much-touted first 100 days used by many executives tasked with turning a flailing company around. So how does an executive go about picking up the pieces and devising a recovery plan for a federal regulator with 4000 staff after one of the biggest financial disasters in modern history? Schapiro says she had three priorities: assessing what needed to be done within the organisation; shifting the agency’s focus back to protecting the investor; and acknowledging its mistakes. The new......

Words: 1573 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...Mary Schapiro is a level 5 leader. The level 5 leader displays qualities of personal humility and fierce resolve. Level 5 leaders are often underestimated or overlooked, and are quiet often shy, quiet and give the impression of being timid. However, this is often accompanied by fearless and ferocious resolve. The fundamental qualities of a level 5 leader are a combination of personal humility and deep professional dedication. Level 5 leader are courageous and disciplined. Fierce resolve requires making tough and possibly unpopular decisions, and following them through in the face of adversity. Selecting the right people for the right job and removing unsuitable people is a fundamental for success. Transformational Leadership They provide individualized consideration and intellectual stimulation, and possess charisma. People need to be encouraged, refreshed, empowered, and nurtured. The leader adds vigor, life and energy to them. She can reflect the image of her vision and her values that inspire people to work. This leadership style is built on top of the transactional style, in which leaders guide and motivate their followers in the direction of established goals by clarifying role and task requirements. SEC was in need of complete transformation and overhaul. Phase 1 of transformation restoring the agency’s vigour and creditability within the financial regulatory community. Detailed analysis of external and internal environment reveals......

Words: 447 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Management and Leadership - Mary Schapiro

...Mary Schapiro and SEC Management and leadership SEC • Criticism for failing to predict, control or even contain the GFC • Under its watch Bernard Madoff, managed to operate the largest Ponzi scheme and Lehman brothers collapsed, bringing down business confidence and reputations • Regulators and traders were investing in schemes they did not understand and whose behaviour they could not predict • The SEC was exposed as ill-equipped to deal with the chaos after the GFC • US govt handed the financial sector a multi-billion dollar bailout • In 2010, it SEC reached it largest ever settlement when Goldman Sachs was fined $550 million for committing fraud by misleading investors about mortgage securities • Lack of attention to detail to every level of an enterprise Mary Schapiro • Career regulator • She was appointed by the president to assess what went wrong and to ensure it did not happen again • 29th chairman of the SEC and this first female chair • Restoring the agency’s vigour and credibility within the financial regulatory community • A high functioning, agile and intelligent agency, that is committed to investor protection and market integrity is necessary to ensure the success of the economy • Time pressed • Main priorities 1. Assessing what needs to be done within the organisation 2. Shifting the agency’s focus back to protecting the investor 3. Acknowledging its mistakes • Resigned from the SEC to join Promontory financial as a consultant......

Words: 744 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Mary Schapiro

...Why Mary was appointed: what change drivers lead to her appointment? 1: Under its watch, fraudster Bernard Madoff managed to operate the largest Ponzi scheme in history 2: Wall Street stalwart Lehman Brothers collapsed, taking billions of dollars, business confidence and reputations down with it. She needed to assess what went wrong and to ensure it didn't happen again. Her Key tasks were: 1-identify the issues - assessing what needed to be done within the organisation to restore the agency's vigour and credibility within the financial regulatory community Solution: Bought in new senior team Staff were sent to qualify as certified fraud examiners. A whole layer of management was removed and those employees were reassigned to the front line. 2-continue main role (protecting investor) - shifting the agency's focus back to protecting the investor (Plan for Short win: turning a flailing company around) - putting devices in place to ensure "a Madoff' could never happen again to the agency. She called it the investor- focused agenda, a hallmark of her stewardship. 3- Get their act together - acknowledging its mistakes - had to admit to the gaps in its performance that allowed someone like Madoff to pull off his scam for so long. Transformation plans: New senior team – Mary appointed new senior team as new blood to flash the old attitude, behaviour, culture out of current culture of SEC. Also new skills that the agency hadn't traditionally had - it had always......

Words: 352 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Mary Walker

...MARY E. WALKER By: Rebecca Leadership March 2, 2013 I chose Mary Edwards Walker as my leader for this final project. I have always enjoyed reading a little bit of military history and I always look for stories about people who have gone above and beyond the call of duty or went against the grain. In my opinion, she really set the bar high for other women to follow, and I find her to be an exemplary leader and role model for other women in the business world. Mary Walker was born on November 26, 1832 in Oswego, New York (Unknown, Women in History ). She can accredit her leadership style and personality to her father, Alvah. Her father was a farmer, abolitionist, and a self-taught doctor. During this time, most women did not attend school or work outside the home, but because Mary’s father believed that women should be well educated, he built the first schoolhouse in Oswego on their land known as the Bunker Hill Farm (Unknown, Women in History ). In addition, this farm served as a “station” in the Underground Railroad system that assisted southern slaves to freedom—mainly from western New York into Canada (D. L. Walker 29-30) . Alvah also believed that women’s clothing was too tight and because his daughters had to help on the farm, he prohibited them from wearing the traditional clothing and corsets (Unknown, Women in History ). When Mary turned 18, she spent two years at the Falley Seminary where she was taught Mathematics, Philosophy, Grammar, and...

Words: 2254 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Maries Historie

...1 Litterær artikel Maries historie __________________________________________ Hvad afgør, om man har fundet sin egen identitet? Kan man skifte identitet ud fra hændelser i sit liv, og vil det påvirke individets identitet resten af livet, eller kan man skifte igen? Det er nok ikke noget så mange almindelige mennesker går og bryder deres hjerner med i en travl hverdag – altså tænker over hvem de er, hvilken identitet de har, og hvordan og hvad der har været afgørende for, at man er er blevet til den person, man er, og hvad der gør, at man lever efter specielle normer og værdier. Måske prøver nogle at flygte fra den identitet, de har skabt, eller nogle ender måske i en kasse, hvor de egentlig ikke rigtigt hører hjemme, men de ved ikke, hvordan de flygter fra det… Ovenstående tankevækkende spørgsmål kan man bl.a. læse om i Christina Hesselholdts novelle: ”Maries historie,” som blev bragt i ”Ud og SE” i Januar 1994. Christina Helleholdts novelle ”Maries Historie” handler om en kvinde, der bærer på en stor sorg efter tabet af hendes veninde Marie mange år tilbage. ”Vi var begge fyldt ti et år, Vi var ikke født den samme dag, men det føltes sådan.” (s 1 l 76.) Novellen er fortalt i første person som en jeg-fortæller med indre synsvinkel ”Jeg var udrustet til at møde et menneske der græd mere end jeg selv.” (s. 1 l. 5) På den måde får man virkelig jeg personens indre tanker og følelser med, som er vigtige for netop denne novelle, der bygger meget på tanker og følelser.......

Words: 1163 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Transcript of Mary

...University Mary, Mother of Jesus Transcript Submitted To Dr. William Joseph Subash NBST 515 By Lisa Tipton Centerville, OH May 4, 2014 Lesson 1 History and life of Mary Introduction We will look into the history and life of Mary Mother of Jesus. Mary’s background is a key to understanding her as the human mother of the Son of God. Luke 2:6 says, “And so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered.” Mary represented every human who needed deliverance. It was almost as if she carried the weight of the world while also carrying the salvation for that world. While many honor her and pray to her over praying to Christ, we will learn of the human side of Mary. I. History of Mary a. Came from the line of Nathan, son of David (Luke 3:31)Matt b. Cousin of Elizabeth (Mother of John the Baptist) c. Found favor with God (Luke 1:30) d. Engaged to Joseph (Matt. 1:18) e. She was a virgin while married to Joseph until after the birth of Jesus (Matt. 1:19, 25) f. She was young and poor when visited by the angel Gabriel (Luke 1:27) II. Prior to the Birth of Christ g. According to the authors of Matthew (Matt. 1:18-25) and Luke (Luke 1:26-38), Mary was a virgin h. Knew Scripture concerning a virgin giving birth (Matt. 1:23) i. Married to a man that listened to and followed God (Matt. 1:20) Conclusion We will learn of the background of......

Words: 3150 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Mary Slessor

...Mary Mitchell Slessor was born in 1848 in Scotland, she was the second of seven children. She credited much of her good character to her upbringing from her deeply religious mother. Her father ran a shoe making business that did not go well, he became an alcoholic, which resulted hardship and poverty for the family. Mary started working to help provide for her family at a very young age, her wages became the primary source of the family income, she worked up to ten hours a day to make ends meet for her family. She became a Christian at a young age. She enjoyed going to church; it was a getaway from her unhappy life at home. Her older brother who was planning to go as a missionary died, at 25 years old, she decided to go in his place. She embarked on her missionary journey to calabar in 1975 where her battle for women’s rights began, she fell sick from malaria several times and eventually passed away in 1915, nearly forty years after coming to Africa, at the age of 66. Mary Slessor has become an inspiration to all who hear her story. She was not only a pioneer missionary, but also an activist for women in general. Slessor campaigned against injustices against women. Witchcraft and superstition were prevalent in Nigeria when she arrived there because traditional society had been torn apart by the slave trade. Human sacrifice routinely followed the death of a village dignitary for instance tribal customs like killing one wife of a chief in order for her soul to accompany her......

Words: 1100 - Pages: 5