Free Essay

Medical Malpractice

In: Other Topics

Submitted By ardizzoni11
Words 3268
Pages 14
Brian Ardizzoni
Michael Neil
English 1301, Composition 1
25 November 2012

Medical Malpractice For nearly forty years, tort reform constantly becomes an increasingly

controversial issue affecting the medical community, the legal community and most of

all, the victims of some very unfortunate accidents. Tort reform refers to laws passed

on a state-by-state basis which place limits or caps on the type or amount of damages

awarded in personal injury lawsuits. Those who advocate medical malpractice tort

reform believe limitations should be set on the amount of damages a plaintiff or

injured party can be rewarded by the court. These advocates usually include medical

professionals and insurance companies. Their argument is that too many frivolous

lawsuits lead to high malpractice insurance, the increasing cost of medical care and a

burden on the taxpayers whose tax dollars absorb the extravagant litigation costs for

these claims. They believe doctors will eventually be unable to practice medicine due

to costly malpractice insurance premiums which may leave many Americans unable to

obtain much-needed healthcare.

In the past, as the rate of malpractice suits began to grow, so did the rate of

malpractice insurance. This ended up having a dire impact on the medical profession.

For one thing, many qualified doctors ended up leaving their practices and focusing

more on preventative medicine. In other words, they felt compelled to order up costly

tests, many of which that were not necessary, in an attempt to stave off lawsuits

claiming misdiagnoses. The impact on the medical industry as a whole, raises the

cost of medicine and insurance premiums for everyone.

However, according to Stephen Daniels, attorneys also pay for malpractice

insurance and therefore understand the ramifications. You do not see as much

debate over their costs though. What he means, Plaintiffs normally do not have their

own money to do battle with the insurance companies in court. However, these costs

are included in the malpractice insurance for doctors. Significantly, politicians, pundits

and physicians began casting stones against individuals who seek help from the court

system for substandard medical treatment. Campaigns for tort reform re-emerge on the

heels of the recent midterm elections and the controversial federal health care law.

Proponents again champion limitations on medical malpractice cases to protect against

increasing health care costs and a failing health care system. Medical malpractice is a

legal cause of action that affords individual’s compensation to offset the harm from

substandard medical care. The harms typically include serious injuries that forever alter

a victim's life or cause death. Medical malpractice cases seek to offset these harms

through compensating the victim and provide an incentive for medical providers to meet

accepted standards of science.

Annotated Bibliography

Bovbjerg, Mike. “Malpractice Reform in Policy Perspective.” Milbank Quarterly Volume 85, Issue 2 (2007): 297-305. Web

Enacted caps on malpractice awards and proposed early offer reform

address the sometimes excessive verdicts of conventional liability and its very

high overhead costs. However, such reforms greatly benefit medical defendants

while doing too little for claimants or patients in general. Caps and early offer

only affect current claims; far broader reforms are therefore needed to improve

the woeful performance of liability as a general promoter of patient safety and

injury compensation. Broad reforms, however desirable, seldom surmount high

political and practical hurdles. A good, more evenhanded start would seek to

make claims resolution faster, more accurate, more predictable and less

expensive, while separately promoting medical quality and safety as well as

greater transparency for law, medicine and insurance.

This article states that though the medical profession’s held in high regard,

there is public backlash against managed care. The legal system purports to

oversee medical care and later deter substandard care, yet huge problems exist,

though both the number and the size of lawsuits have increased by an order of

magnitude since modern medical liability began to emerge half century ago. This

is the key failure of liability as an injury-reduction system. Liability also fails to

contribute to another aspect of the rule of law, that is, to create a predictable

framework within which people can organize their affairs.

Carroll, Aaron. “The Impact of Defense Expenses in Medical Malpractice Claims.” Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. Volume 14 (2012): 135-142. Web

Carroll’s article shows wherever health care reform is debated, the state of

medical professional liability (MPL) system in the United States re-emerges as an

issue if importance. The issues with the MPL system are a point of contention

among the stakeholders groups. Though recent data shows medical liability

premiums flat over the past few years, many agree that medical professional

liability premiums remain unaffordable for many physicians with coverage less

available for certain medical specialties in specific areas of the country.

The objective of this study was to take a closer look at defense-related

expenses for medical malpractice cases over time. They conducted a

retrospective review of medical malpractice claims reported to the Physician

Insurers Association of America's Data Sharing Project with a closing date

between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 2008. On average a medical

malpractice claim costs more than $27,000 to defend. Claims that go to trial are

much more costly to defend than are those that are dropped, withdrawn, or

dismissed. However, since the overwhelming majority of claims are dropped,

withdrawn, or dismissed, the total amount spent to defend them surpasses that

spent on claims that go to trial. Defense attorney expenses account for the

majority of defense-related expenses (74%), while expert witness expenses and

other expenses split the remaining 26%. A strong association was also found

between the average indemnity payment and the amount it costs to defend

individual claims by specialty. The study found that defense-related expenses for

medical malpractice claims are not an insignificant cost. As state and federal

governments debate how to repair the malpractice system, addressing the high

cost of defending claims should not be ignored.

Daniels, Stephen. “It is No Longer Viable From a Practical And Business Standpoint: Damage Caps, hidden Victims and The Declining Interest in Medical Malpractice Cases.” International Journal of the Legal Profession. Volume 17, Issue 1 (2010): 59-82. Web

This article investigates two propositions concerning the effects of a key

tort reform measure in the United States - non-economic damage (i.e., pain and

suffering) caps in medical malpractice cases. The first says plaintiffs' lawyers,

who rely on contingency fees, will stop representing certain clients in such cases.

The second goes farther, saying lawyers will handle fewer malpractice cases

generally. Using survey and interview data from plaintiffs' lawyers in Texas, the

article presents strong evidence for both propositions. In doing so, it provides an

excellent illustration of the theoretical idea of plaintiffs' lawyers as rational actors

constantly adjusting their practices and their businesses to changes in the

working environment.

The value of this article lies in outlining a clear consequence in legal

changes limiting access to the civil justice system. This article demonstrates that

anyone seeking civil action for medical malpractice will find it much more difficult

obtaining representation. It goes on to explain that in most states such as Texas,

California and New York, it will be almost impossible for the average medical

care recipient to obtain recourse against a health care provider. The findings

show how a cap on non-economic damages affects the practices of plaintiffs'

lawyers by limiting damages to a degree that significantly alters the incentive

structure that lies at the heart of the contingency fee system.

Hermer, Laura. “Defensive Medicine, Cost Containment and Reform.” Journal of General Internal Medicine. Volume 25, Issue 5 (2010): 470-473. Web

The role of defensive medicine in driving up health care costs is hotly

contended. Physicians and health policy experts in particular tend to have

sharply divergent views on the subject. Physicians argue that defensive

medicine is a significant driver of health care cost inflation. Policy analysts, on

the other hand, observe that malpractice reform, by itself, will probably not do

much to reduce costs. The article argues that both answers are incomplete.

Ultimately, malpractice reform is a necessary but insufficient component of

medical cost containment. The evidence suggests that defensive medicine

accounts for a small but non-negligible fraction of health care costs. Yet the

traditional medical malpractice reforms that many physicians desire will not

assuage the various pressures that lead providers to overprescribe and

over-treat. These reforms may, nevertheless, be necessary to persuade

physicians to accept necessary changes in their practice patterns as part of the

larger changes to the health care payment and delivery systems that cost

containment requires.

The point of this article demonstrates the link between medical

malpractice reform and cost containment. Most U.S. physicians believe that

defensive medicine, fueled by the present medical malpractice system is a major

driver of excessive health care costs. Yet, many health care analysts argue that

the total contribution of malpractice costs to health care cost inflation overall

amounts to only a miniscule percentage of total health care costs, thus

malpractice reform is unlikely to lead to substantial cost savings. Malpractice

reform is necessary but insufficient component of cost containment. Tort reform

itself will do little to reduce costs. Unless liability concerns are addressed, its

unlikely that most physicians will adopt the systemic strategies needed for cost

control. In addition to the psychological toll medical malpractice takes, the

present malpractice system is highly inefficient. Tort reform needs to occur as an

adjunct to the revision of our health care payment and delivery systems.

Igel, Lee. “The Forgotten Hysteria Over Medical Malpractice.” New York University Journal of Medicine. Volume 47, Issue 6 (2010): 525-528. Web

Lee Igel’s article explores the origins of the medical malpractice crisis and

describes the basic social, economic and political transformations that led to its

emergence and the reasons for its rise. An understanding of these dynamics

explains the gap in awareness about what the doctor/patient relationship is and

what it should be and its correlation to the upsurge in medical malpractice

lawsuits and patient safety programs. The author recommends managing for

and conserving the doctor/patient relationship as the key priority to be tackled in

order to put an end to the crisis and prevent circumstances that further

encourage it.

This articles value lies primarily in the effect modern day medical

malpractice has on physicians and patients alike. The confusion about

patient safety and medical malpractice is extensive with a significant impact

on public safety and health care. Most specific, is the impact on physician and

patient relationships. There is a gap in awareness between the actual

relationship opposed to what it should be. There is little understanding about

the development of this gap as well as the correlation to the upsurge in medical

malpractice lawsuits and patient safety programs. The concept of “managed

care” and its implementation in modern day America correlates directly to an

increase in medical malpractice lawsuits. The malpractice claim is a symptom

of the degradation of the old order of health care. The loss of the traditional

health care created a fear of being abandoned in a world the patient could not

understand and produced a vacuum that led to a search for change.

Nahed, Brian, Maya Babu, Timothy Smith and Robert Heary. “Malpractice Liability and Defensive Medicine.” PLOS One. Volume 7, Issue 6 (2012): 1-7. Web

Nahed, et al article concerning rising healthcare expenditures led to

increased scrutiny of medical practices. As medical liability and malpractice risk

rise to crisis levels, the medical-legal environment contributed to the practice

of defensive medicine as practitioners attempt to mitigate liability risk. High-risk

specialties such as neurosurgery became particularly affected and

neurosurgeons alter their practices to lessen medical-legal risk. They present

the first national survey of American neurosurgeons' perceptions of malpractice

liability and defensive medicine practices.

The value of this article lies in a validated, 51 question online survey

sent to 3,344 practicing U.S. neurosurgeon members of the American

Association of Neurological Surgeons, representing 76% of neurosurgeons in

academic and private practices. A total of 1,028 surveys were completed (31%

response rate) by neurosurgeons representing diverse sub-specialty practices.

Respondents engaged in defensive medicine practices by ordering additional

imaging studies (72%), laboratory tests (67%), referring patients to consultants

(66%), or prescribing medications (40%). Malpractice premiums were

considered a "major or extreme" burden by 64% of respondents, which resulted

in 45% of respondents eliminating high-risk procedures from their practice due to

liability concerns. The conclusion of the article states the concerns and

perceptions about medical liability lead practitioners to practice defensive

medicine. As a result, diagnostic testing, consultations and imaging studies are

ordered to satisfy a perceived legal risk, resulting in higher healthcare

expenditures. To minimize malpractice risk, some neurosurgeons have

eliminated high-risk procedures. Left unchecked, concerns over medical liability

will further defensive medicine practices, limit patient access to care and

increase the cost of healthcare delivery in the United States.

Nelson, Leonard. “Damages Caps in Medical Malpractice Cases.” Milbank Quarterly. Volume 85, Issue 2 (2010): 259-286. Web

This article reviews the empirical literature on the effects of damages caps

and concludes that the better designed studies show that damages caps reduce

liability insurance premiums. The effects of damages caps on defensive

medicine, physicians’ location decisions and the cost of health care to consumers

are less clear. The only study of whether consumers benefit from lower health

insurance premiums as a result of damages caps found no impact. Some state

courts have based decisions declaring damages caps legislation unconstitutional

on the lack of evidence of their effectiveness, thereby ignoring the findings of

conflicting research studies or discounting their relevance. Although courts

should be cautious in rejecting empirical evidence that caps are effective,

legislators should consider whether they benefit consumers enough to justify

limiting tort recoveries for those most seriously injured by malpractice.

The value of this article details damage caps as the most controversial

aspect of malpractice reform. Debate over whether medical malpractice damage

caps have reduced medical malpractice premiums or not still rages on. Nearly all

of the rigorous empirical analysis conducted since 1990 found that malpractice

are lower in the presence of damage caps. Only one study found caps

ineffective in this regard. The effects of damage caps on the practice of

defensive medicine, physician’s location decisions and the cost of health care on

consumers are less clear. The article demonstrates there is evidence of small to

modest effects of damage caps on defensive medicine and some evidence that

caps expand the valuable supply of physicians.

Schoenbaum, Stephen. “Malpractice Reform Must Include Steps To Prevent Medical Injury.” Milbank Annals of Internal Medicine. Volume 140, Issue 1 (2004): 51-54. Web

In the current malpractice insurance crisis, physicians focus their

advocacy and energy primarily on rapidly increasing liability premiums; problems

in access to care; and demands for legal reform, especially caps on damages.

An even more important focus, however, is prevention of injury and improvement

of patient safety. Physicians largely control patient care and can play a critical

role in systematically reducing injury. Reforms should go beyond liability issues;

they should also harness and enhance physicians' ability to act. More visible

efforts by physicians to reduce harm, better communication with patients and

others and true evidence of improved patient safety should reduce patient anger

and litigiousness. Individually and collectively, physicians can and should ensure

that "doing no harm" comes first in the malpractice debate.

This article stresses that more active work on the part of the physicians

to improve care and reduce harm is clearly in the best interest of the public. In a

culture in which physicians actively seek to guard and improve patient safety and

learn from problems, talking with patients. Avoiding liability claims or reaching

reasonable settlements becomes more likely. As the general public grows to

understand health care is much safer, poor outcomes should be seen as less

likely to result from medical error. Anger and litigiousness should decline as well.

The article goes on to state that for all of these reasons, reduction of harm should

be an essential part of any reform of medical liability or reform. Physicians

should devise successful mechanisms to harness their considerable knowledge

and skills to reduce harm. They are most effective when working collectively

within medical organizations along with lawmakers, insurers, hospital

administrators and patients.

Williams, Alan. “The Cure for What Ails, A Realistic Remedy For The Medical Malpractice Crisis.” Stanford Law and Policy Review. Volume 23.2 (2010): 447-521. Web

William’s article provides a brief history of the medical malpractice crisis

and the current landscape of medical negligence from the various parties

perspectives. He goes on to explain the political aspects surrounding the issue

and attempts to address medical malpractice through conventional tort reform

and alternative legal systems. The article also describes efforts by medical

institutions to approach medical malpractice via a reduction of medical errors

strategy. The articles value lies primarily in the effort to summarize non-traditional

approaches to the issue of liability for medical errors. He outlines a

comprehensive solution, if implemented nationally, may fully address the

competing challenges of medical malpractice liability. Between the 1950’s and

1980’s, medical malpractice filings increased by 1000%. During that time, the

dollar amounts awarded by juries rose by more than 275%. Medical malpractice

insurance premiums rose in response to these increases, driving some

physicians to retire, change practice areas to lower risk specialties or refuse to

accept high-risk patients. In response, many states enacted tort reform

legislation in an effort to curb the amount of lawsuits and reduce the amounts

awarded by juries. The tort reform reduced exorbitant medical malpractice

insurance premiums, a benefit to the medical and surgical professions.

Yackee, Susan. “Private Conflict and Policy Passage with Medical Malpractice Reform.” Policy Studies Journal. Volume 37, Issue 2 (2009): 213-231. Web

James Madison’s article argued in Federalist 10 that “rival political

factions” work against the public good. In contrast to Madison's pessimistic

account, Susan’s article suggests that factional conflict can lead to more

representative public policy and thus further the will of the people. She theorizes

that elected officials often seek a safe political position, one that corresponds to

the preferences of the public at large during periods of high conflict. She assess

this theory in one, salient policy area, medical malpractice. The article then goes

on to measure conflict with contributions for state candidates given by (i) the

health and insurance industries, which generally support malpractice laws and (ii)

lawyers, who frequently oppose the laws. The article finds that group conflict

matters to policy outcomes and finds evidence that, under conditions of elevated

conflict, adopted policies are more likely to move toward the general ideological

preferences of the public at large. These results suggest that group conflict

affects both the quantity and character of policy in the American states.

This article explores the role group conflict plays within the passage of

salient public policies in the American states. It theorizes that conflict facilitates

the creation of more representative policy because government officials seek out

a secure political position on salient policies when interest groups are locked in

conflict. This secure position often coincides with the general preferences of a

policymaker's constituency. This argument implies that conflict between

opposing interests does not obstruct, but instead may facilitate policy

convergence toward the public's preferences when policy areas are important.

The article finds limited support for this argument in the policy area of medical

malpractice reform. The conclusion explains that group conflict may enhance the

general ideological representation of citizens under some circumstances.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Medical Malpractice and Informed Consent

...Medical Malpractice and Informed Consent In order to prove that Dr. Green was negligent in her treatment of Mr. Parker the plaintiff needed to prove that Dr. Green did not perform her duty, breached her duty, caused the injures, and that she suffered damaged. In this case, Dr. Green did not exercise reasonable care under the circumstances by not following the manufactures stated dosing instructions and prescribing the incorrect dose in both oral and written instructions. Dr. Green violated her breach of duty by failing to meet the applicable standard of care. It would be hard to argue that others physicians would have prescribed the incorrect dose in their standard treatment of care. It is my opinion that plaintiff would succeed in proving that Dr. Green did not perform her duty and breached her duty. While the statement of facts presented does not state the amount that is needed to overdose on pentamite or what effects of an incorrect dosage will have on an individual taking pentamite, the plaintiff could argue that taking the prescribed dosage of 10 times the stated dose by the manufacturer for two weeks caused the heart attack that ended Mr. Parker’s life. Dr. Green could argue that the dizzy spells were a sign of a medical condition that no matter what treatment she gave, the heart attack that ended Mr. Parker’s life could have happened and she did not cause it. In order to estimate the success of this claim I would need more information about pentamite and......

Words: 1064 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Malpractice

...Imagine waking up from a double mastectomy surgery to hear the great news that you do not have cancer, to only find out later that you never had cancer and that your medical chart got mixed up with another patient who does. This type of situation was caused by medical malpractice and negligence by the physician. In this paper key topic that will be discussed is the definition of negligence, lawsuits, standard of care, malpractice, malpractice cases, and the law. Negligence is the unintentional or omission of an act that a sensible person would not have done or looked over. A negligent person might also disregard their duties whereas a sensible person would not. There are different types of negligence which include misfeasance, malfeasance, and nonfeasance. Misfeasance is when a provider does the correct action incorrectly causing an injury. Malfeasance is when a provider performs an act that is deemed unlawful such as performing a procedure in a state where it is illegal. Nonfeasance is when a provider fails to perform duties that a reasonable person would have fulfilled. In order for a person or party to claim that negligence played a part in an injury, medical condition, or death it must be proven. There are multiple key factors that must occur such as a breach in the standard of care and negligence is responsible for the injury. Standard of care is the level of care that a patient can expect to receive. A breach in care is just the opposite the patient does not receive...

Words: 1359 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Malpractice

...    W2A1 Malpractice Jacqueline Martin a women from Brooklyn went to see a doctor a series of times in 2004. She now suffers from brain damage and is incapacitated. Her mother talked to a lawyer and told him that her daughter went to see them because she was having seizures. The hospital put her on the wrong medication, didn’t respond to her crises, and did not provide the right treatment for her. She developed swelling on her face, eye’s, and throat from an allergic reaction to the medications they had been giving her. (FLEGENHEIMER, 2012)The ruling allocated primary responsibility to two city hospitals: 50 percent to Jacobi Medical Center in the Bronx, and 40 percent to Kings County Hospital Center in Brooklyn. It also allocated 5 percent responsibility to Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center, and 4 percent to one of its neurologists. I can’t believe both hospitals misdiagnosed her condition. On top of that the hospitals thought that what her lawyer was suing them for was too much. She was a working mother of two children and all the suffering they all went through doesn’t even compare to what she got out of the settlement. Her lawyer stated it was the largest law suit in the state. I can’t believe they didn’t do a series of test to check more into her case. Things like this are very serious and the hospitals are dealing with a person’s life when it comes to diagnoses like the one Jaquiline had. ...

Words: 333 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations

...Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations In this assignment we will cover the statute of limitations that govern medical malpractice. We will do such by identifying the statute of limitations placed on medical malpractice by Alabama and Massachusetts. We will discuss some of the similarities and differences between the two. The State of Alabama has very specific rules when it comes to the statute of limitations they impose on medical malpractice. In Alabama all actions against health-care providers must be filed within two years after the date of the injury occurred, or within six months of the date the injury was, or should have been, discovered. In no event may a suit be filed more than four years after the date of the act giving rise to the injury occurred. This limitations period applies to minors over four years of age. However, in the case of a minor under four years of age, that minor has until his or her eighth birthday to file a medical malpractice action In Massachusetts there are also certain statutes of limitations for medical malpractice that must be considered if filing a malpractice suit. All medical malpractice actions must be filed within seven years after the date of the act or omission giving rise to the injury with the exception of actiosn for a foreign object being left inside the body, in which case the limitations period begins to run when the plaintiff discovers or should have discovered the presence of the foreign object. For medical......

Words: 496 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Malpractice

...Malpractice or Poor Judgement? The practice of medicine has never claimed to be an exact science. In fact, it is very much a hit-and-miss situation. Taking into account these above factors, India seems to be on a destructive trend regarding their level of health care. Ever since private medical services fell under the Consumer Protection Act (COPRA) in April 1993, the number of malpractice suits filed against doctors has begun to soar. For example, in Kerala, approximately 1800 cases (15% of the total number of cases) have been filed. As Dr. Dipak Banerjee of the Indian Medical Association puts it: "It's degenerating into a kind of witch-hunt." For years the community of doctors across India was immune to charges of malpractice, but the tide has begun to turn. Doctors are now having to dish out larger sums of money in order to insure themselves adequately. Insurance companies have caught on as well, raising the price of malpractice insurance on most doctors. For instance, a doctor who would have had to pay Rs. 125 annually now has to pay up to Rs. 1500. These costs will only be passed along to the patients in the long run, and the condition is only going to worsen. Take for example the United States, where surgeons annually pay an average of $75,000 on insurance premiums. On top of these premiums, doctors who practice very defensively add as much as $21 billion US to the health care bill every year. Twenty percent of the tests prescribed by doctors were......

Words: 346 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Florida Supreme Court Tosses Medical Malpractice Caps

...Florida Supreme Court Tosses Medical Malpractice Caps Lenore LaBree HCS/430 March 17, 2014 Nancy Geedey Florida Supreme Court Tosses Medical Malpractice Caps Medical malpractice law suits are common within the United States. This paper will discuss this regulatory issue and the relationship it has to the nature, sources and functions of the law. The information in this paper will also educate the readers on the medical malpractice laws and the reasoning for caps being placed on malpractice. Malpractice is a form of negligence that is defined as “professional negligence” (Fremgen, 2012 p. 39, para. 6). Both malpractice and negligence relate to wrongdoing. Negligence leads to liability in malpractice. Professional malpractice includes physicians, nurses, lawyers, accountants, pharmacists, and other health care professionals (Fremgen, 2012). This is why it is important for health care professionals to carry medical malpractice insurance. This type of insurance is costly for physicians, but is a must for physicians to have in the event he or she loses a litigation case. The physicians’ medical malpractice insurance also covers the employee within the facility that are not licensed. Because of the nature of today’s litigation on medical malpractice most other licensed medical professionals carry his or her own insurance for reassurance. In the past, people could sue hospitals and/or physicians for medical malpractice and a jury would decide how much the patient would......

Words: 914 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Medical Malpractice

...rising cost of Medical Malpractice insurance Sharron Wickham BU224 Kaplan University Professor Greg Evans April 3, 2014 Quick rising medical malpractice premiums have become a concerning problem and a discussion for doctors, insurance policy writers and even the public. The rise in medical malpractice insurance costs can have a big effect in the way health care is given in the U.S. Rises in the premiums can change the size of our doctor workforce and can even cause the doctors to practice “defensive medicine”. Medical malpractice insurance premiums are a huge discussion and have changed over the past 30 years, affecting the areas doctors are trying to work in and how they are practicing medicine, this can cause the people to not receive the best care they can. Just 30 years ago a doctor could feel comfortable in the room with his patient, laugh talk about the family and enjoy the time with the patient, as well as take care of their health needs. There were way more doctors that made house calls back in the day and more doctors willing to practice medicine in any area. So what changed? The fact that patients took advantage of the doctors and started suing doctors for malpractice. Malpractice claims have been known to have juries that make excessively generous awards knowing that insurance companies pay. For this reason, malpractice premiums have skyrocketed over the past 30 years. According to Towers Perrin, a global professional services firm, malpractice......

Words: 1347 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Medical Malpractice

...National estimates of medical liability system costs—including settlements, legal and administrative costs and defensive medicine—range from $55.6 billion annually to $200 billion annually (NCSL, 2011). Medical malpractice reform, also known as tort reform, includes strategies to limit medical malpractice costs, deter medical errors, and ensure that patients who are injured by medical negligence are fairly compensated. Tort reform has the potential to reduce health care expenditures by reducing the number of malpractice claims, the average size of malpractice awards and tort liability system administrative costs. It also may lead to fewer instances of defensive medicine where physicians order tests and procedures not primarily to ensure the health of the patient but as a safeguard against possible medical malpractice liability (NCSL, 2011). Medical malpractice reform proponents argue that tort reforms—such as limiting malpractice awards, tightening statutes of limitations for filing claims, increasing expert witness standards, and screening cases before they go to trial—not only reduce overall medical care spending but also increase access to care (NCSL, 2011). Strategies to improve malpractice claims include limiting awards; placing stricter limits on statutes of limitations; establishing minimum qualifications for expert witnesses; periodic payment provisions; modified Collateral Source Rules; Attorney Contingent fee limits; and other medical Liability related reforms...

Words: 513 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Malpractice

...State Medical Malpractice Creating Change Within Organizations HCS 587 Most hospitals, staff nurse and physicians biggest fear, is being sued for malpractice. As health care providers, we strive to do right by the patient, always practicing safety first. Medical malpractice, periodically referred to as medical negligence, it happens when a health care provider violates the governing standard of care when providing treatment to a patient, the source the patient to suffer an injury. The United States malpractice system has two objectives: to compensate patients who are injured through negligence by a healthcare provider and to discourage health care providers from practicing negligently Malpractice is a personal-injury law. For a person to be able to sue the plaintiff they must prove that the “defendant breached his/her duty by failing to adhere to the standard of care, and the breach of duty caused an injury to the the plaintiff” (Studdert,et al, 2004). It is up to the plaintiff to prove with evidence that the health care provider, hospital or clinic is responsible. In the United states, we have over 50 states and each and every one of them have their own medical malpractice statutes/laws. Majority seem to not have a good model to be an example of medical malpractice statutes, below Nebraska and Indiana’s statutes seem to be doing something right. They both also have similarities which may be why I choose them and prefer there way of dealing with......

Words: 1528 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Medical Malpractice

...years, medical malpractice has increased dramatically. Now in today’s society, a doctor’s duty is to use reasonable care, judgement, and skill in his/her profession and when negligent, take full responsibility. In other cases, medical malpractice has been used against doctors by patients in order to sue and gain large amounts of money. In a well developed essay defend, challenge, or qualify whether medical malpractice is a serious issue at hand and whether it can have an impact on the medical field. Malpractice at its core is negligence and negligence is a tort; therefore, malpractice is a civil wrong. This is a detrimental issue within our society because it affects every person and in reality our health is the most important thing we have to maintain. Every health care provider assumes a duty when starting consultations, diagnosis, or treatment of a patient. This duty can be expressed in concrete form, such as a contract, given to the health care provider at the beginning of his/her position as a physician or an implied ethical duty to carry out medical processes with reasonable care and skill. If the doctor fails to provide the patient with appropriate diagnosis they have made a violation of their duty; as a result, a violation of a doctors duty ultimately causes damage to the patient. The result of damage to the patient will reside in an ultimate breach in the doctors duty to provide adequate care, thus neglecting the patient which is malpractice.......

Words: 669 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Medical Malpractice and Quality of Care

...Medical Malpractice and Quality of Care: With the increase in costs of malpractice insurance for doctors, how is our quality of care affected and what can be done about it? Rising malpractice insurance affects everyone seeking medical care and should be a cause for serious concern. At first, the health care industry saw rising premiums as only a temporary backlash from a couple of lawsuits with multimillion dollar jury awards. Therefore, health care administrators, insurance companies, and public officials worried little about planning for the snow-balling crisis that exists today. People blame greedy lawyers and generous juries for the problem; however, I feel that more than one cause led to our current situation. Today, administrators and lawmakers debate the best solution to this dilemma. Many suggest that by merely capping monetary damages awarded, malpractice rates will stabilize. I disagree. I believe that monetary caps must occur to help with the costs, but I also feel that patient/public awareness is essential to the stabilization of insurance premiums. After the first multimillion dollar award in a medical malpractice lawsuit, physicians still felt safe because they believed juries would place little or no emphasis on non-economic damages – awards unrelated to medical costs, lost salary, etc. However, the lawsuits kept coming and the awards, especially for non-economic damages, kept escalating. According to the New York Times, “the average......

Words: 2636 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Medical Malpractice

...------------------------------------------------- Medical Malpractice in Nursing Homes By: Molly Hix Medical malpractice occurs on a daily basis to innocent patients. Today, malpractice continues to increase in nursing homes due to the shortage of qualified staff. Malpractice is when a hospital or any type of healthcare happens through neglect to a patient. Neglect might occur when the diagnosis is wrong, treatment or even aftercare. The number of malpractice cases is on the rise in nursing homes due to the lack of employee to patient ratio leaving patients to suffer and employees on the verge of lawsuits. Back in 1986 a report by the Institute of Medicine was released stating that residents were receiving negligent care. They were likely being physically or mentally abused as well as having all their rights ignored by the caregivers. In 1987 Congress decided to pass a legislation to establish rules and standards for nursing homes. Even though the legislation was passed the nursing homes along with the caregivers were still violating these rules. This regulation was established to make sure patients were receiving the correct care in a professional manner. This meant that the caregivers were required to actively use the available resources to get the proper training to further the patients’ lives and well-being. Fast forward to year 1999, the U.S General Accounting office found a lack of treatment in nearly one- third of all nursing homes. Stated in this report......

Words: 1299 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Medical Malpractice Tort Reform in the Healthcare Industry

...Medical Malpractice Tort Reform in the Healthcare Industry Medical malpractice reform, also known as tort reform, includes strategies to limit medical malpractice costs, deter medical errors and ensure that patients who are injured by medical negligence are fairly compensated. Tort reform has the potential to reduce health care expenditures by reducing the number of malpractice claims, the average size of malpractice awards and tort liability system administrative costs (Medical Malpractice Reform, 2011). Since the 1970s, medical malpractice has been a controversial social issue, which has caused physicians to have increasing concerns about the large number of lawsuits and the negative connotations that tend to go along with them. Physicians have started pushing for legal reforms to decrease the large monetary awards for damages whereas tort attorneys have argued that the negligence suits are an effective way of compensating the victims fairly and forcing the medical professions to follow a proper standard of care (Pozgar, 2013). An article from the Journal of Patient Safety estimates that between 210,000 to 400,000 people die every year in the U.S. from hospital medical errors and 1 in 14 U.S. doctors face a malpractice lawsuit every year (Corapi, 2014). Physicians and healthcare providers argue that the millions of dollars that are awarded in damages increase the cost of healthcare by passing this cost onto the consumer in the form of higher insurance premiums......

Words: 2062 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Medical Malpractice and Informed Consent

...Trends in Tobacco Use American Lung Association Research and Program Services Epidemiology and Statistics Unit July 2011 Table of Contents Mortality Consumption Prevalence of Tobacco Use and Cessation Tobacco Advertising and Promotion State Laws and Secondhand Smoke International Smoking Prevalence List of Tables Table 1: Smoking-Attributable Deaths Among Adults, 2000-2004 and Projected Smoking-Attributable Deaths Among Youth, 2003-2004 Table 2: Cigarette Consumption, United States, 1900-2007 Table 3: Number of Adults Who Were Current Smokers by Sex, Race, and Age, Selected Years, 1965-2009 Table 4: Percent of Adults Who Were Current Smokers by Sex, Race, and Age, Selected Years, 1965-2009 Table 5: Age-Adjusted Prevalence (%) of Current Cigarette Smoking by Persons 25 and Older by Sex, Race and Education, Selected Years, 1974-2009 Table 6: Percent of Adults Who Smoke by the Number of Cigarettes Smoked Daily and the Percent Who Smoked >24 Cigarettes Daily by Sex, Race, Hispanic Origin, Age and Education, Selected Years, 1974-2009 Table 7: Percent of Young Adults (Ages 18-24) Who Were Current, Former or Never Smokers by Sex, Race and Education, 1965-2009 Table 8: Current Cigarette Smoking Prevalence (%) Among Adults by State, Selected Years, 1984-2009 Table 9: Percent of Adults Who Use Other Tobacco Products by Age and Sex, 2002-2009 Table 10: Percent of All Middle and High School Students Who Were Current Users of Tobacco Products by Sex and......

Words: 4958 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Malpractice

...be proven without a shadow of doubt that the healthcare provider (Paramedic); 1) had a duty to act to provide care and treat the plaintiff or patient. 2) The Medic breached the duty to act by failing to provide the required standard of care needed to treat the plaintiff/patient. 3) As a result of the breach of duty harm was done to the plaintiff (patient) and finally 4) to prove that harm was actually done as a result of that action (breech of duty) by the medic/defendant. (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Proof+of+Negligence) What is Malpractice? This is the “improper, illegal, or negligent professional activity or treatment, especially by a medical practitioner, (lawyer, or public official).” (http://www.google.com/#q=what+is+malpractice) In this case we are going to stick to medical aspect of malpractice. FDNY suspends EMTs accused of refusing to help, Dec 21, 2009 NEW YORK — Two emergency medical technicians accused of refusing to help a pregnant woman who collapsed in the coffee shop where they were taking a break were suspended Monday, and Mayor Michael Bloomberg called their behavior inexcusable. The Fire Department of New York suspended Jason Green, a six-year veteran, and Melissa Jackson, a four-year veteran, without pay while the Dec. 9 incident is investigated, spokesman Steve Ritea said. Witnesses, first speaking to The New York Post, said the EMTs told employees at the eatery in downtown Brooklyn to call 911 and then left when they......

Words: 1377 - Pages: 6