Premium Essay

Mouthwash

In: Science

Submitted By fefe89
Words 1110
Pages 5
How Does Your Mouthwash Measure Up: Effects of Specific Mouthwashes on
Staphylococcus epidermis and Bacillus subtilus
Mouthwash Lab Report
Fareeda sanusi
Abstract:
This experiment was done in order to find out which mouthwash killed the bacteria Staphylococcus epidermis and Bacillus subtilus the best. The mouthwashes used were Scope (clean mint baking soda), Listermint with fluoride, Cepacol, Rembrandt, and Therasol. Water was used as a control for the experiment. It allowed students to practice using T -values to determine significance of mouthwash effectiveness. The experiment also determined the active ingredient in the better mouthwash. My own hypothesis was that Scope would work the best on both bacteria. My hypothesis was proved wrong by Bacillus subtilis when Therasol eliminated the most bacteria. As for Staphylococcus epidermis Therasol worked just as well as Scope and Cepacol in killing the bacteria. However, there was significance at the 95% level between Scope and Cepacol. The charts, graphs, and the report below provide more information. Introduction: The battle for better breath is taking place all over the world. With each toothpaste and mouthwash claiming to be the best, how can one possibly determine which one to use? This experiment may perhaps put an end to this particular problem. Five fairly popular mouthwashes were used in this experiment: Scope, Listermint, Cepacol, Rembrandt, and Therasol. The effectiveness of each was tested on two different bacteria: Staphylococcus epidermis and Bacillus subtilus. Staphylococcus epidermis is a bacterium that is found in the skin, hair follicles, and mucus membranes. It is found in these areas so that when breaks in the protective skin occur it may enter. This normally takes place after surgical procedures such as shunt and catheter insertions. This provides an optimum environment for colonization…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

P&G- Scope Case Analysis

...1. Between 1987 and 1990, worldwide sales for P&G had increased by $8 billion and net earnings by $1.3 billion. This success was due to variety of factors, including the ability to develop truly innovative products to meet consumers’ needs. Of the many products introduced throughout the 3 years, Scope, mouthwash, held 34% of the Canadian mouthwash market. Although there was success, there had been concerns with competition and the major changes happening in the mouthwash market. Up until 1988, most mouthwash was marketed primarily on a “bad-breath” strategy. However, Listerine introduced a plaque and inflamed gums preventing mouthwash. New flavors were introduced by a number of brands and it greatly expanded the market in 1987. In 1988 Colgate launched a mouthwash that included fluoride to fight cavities with a mild taste that encouraged children to rinse longer and more often. Finally, Pfizer launched a “prebrushing” rinse called Plax. Although P&G’s Scope held over 30% of the market share in 1990, they recognized that the industry was changing. The market was indefinitely moving towards healthier alternative. 2. Scope’s performance during the past three years can be considered extremely successful. Although it is marginal, in 1988, Scope’s market share was 33% but by 1990 the percentage fell to 32.3%. During the slim decline, Plax’s market share jumped from 1% to 10% in two years. Therefore, the sudden growth in Plax’s sales should be a concern for P&G’s Scope. 3. There......

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Procter & Gamble Inc: Scope

...Procter & Gamble Inc: Scope Scope was introduced in 1967 by Procter & Gamble, is a green mint tasting mouthwash,and was positions as a great tasting mouth refreshing brand that provided bad breathprotection. Scope held 32% share of the Canadian market for 1990. In 1970 Scope becamethe market leader in Canada, with many competitors, such as Listerine mouthwash that waslaunched by Warner Lambert in 1977 and it was a direct competitor to Scope, it had nearlythe same characteristics as Scope with a 12% of the market share during that time. But themajor competitor for Scope was Plax, a brand by Pfizer Inc, which was launched in Canadain 1988 on a platform quite different from the traditional mouthwashes, and gained a 10%share since launched. Plax detergents were supposed to help loosen plaque to makebrushing effective. Before the entry of Plax, brands in the mouth wash market werepositioned around two major benefits that are fresh breath and killing germs, whereas Plaxwas positioned around a new benefit as a plaque fighter and claims Plax removes up tothree times more plaque than just brushing alone.In studying the current situation and preparing for a strategic plan, Gwen Hearst reviewedthe available information and surveys for the mouthwash market and Scope showed that75% of Canadian household use 1 or more mouthwash brands. The company’s marketresearch revealed that users could be segmented to “heavy” users that comprised 40% of all users and to “medium” users that......

Words: 1320 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Case Study

...Proctor and Gamble, Inc. Scope Case Synopsis Gwen Hearst, Scope Mouthwash Brand Manager for Procter & Gamble, Inc is preparing a three year strategic plan for Scope in the Canadian market. Her responsibilities focus on three central areas: maximize the market share, volume and profitability of the brand. She needs to develop a strategy to compete with a new market entry, Plax. Plax has targeted fighting plaque as a new benefit for mouthwash. In two years, Plax has gained 10% of the market and during a time when the market growth rate has been declining. The Scope brand has maintained a constant market share level with slight decline and still retains largest percentage of the market. The strategic options include maintaining the status quo, introducing a new product already developed as either a line extension or flanker product, or develop new marketing plan for existing product. She has formed a team across company functions to address these issues and formulate a strategic plan. Decisions to be Made 1) Should Scope maintain the status quo or seek new opportunities? 2) Should Scope reposition its current product or develop a new product? 3) Should Scope launch a flanker brand or introduce a line extension? These decisions must be made in this order. Scope must first decide if it actually needs or wants to move forward with seeking new opportunities. If Scope wants to maintain the status quo, then no effort......

Words: 2954 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Marketing Strategy for Oral Hygine Product

...Student ID: 089111572 Page 1 MKT306 Marketing Strategy Abbreviations J&J R&D : : Johnson & Johnson Research & Development Student: Joey Kwan Lay Kuan Student ID: 089111572 Page 2 MKT306 Marketing Strategy Report To: From: Date: Reference: Subject: Management of J&J Ms Joey Kwan Lay Kuan 2nd July 2010 MKT306 Marketing Strategy Marketing Strategy for Listerine Children's Mouthwash This report outlines the current market evaluation, as well as the marketing strategy proposed to successfully achieve J&J’s objective of market development to achieve first year Singapore market share 30 percent with sales revenue of SGD9million, followed by 50 percent market share for subsequent 3 years, which amounts SGD15million per annual. Student: Joey Kwan Lay Kuan Student ID: 089111572 Page 3 MKT306 Marketing Strategy 1.0 Executive Summary This academic report will examine the marketing strategy which J&J will engage to launch the Listerine brand children mouthwash product in Singapore market. Despite the weak product awareness of children series mouthwash and fierce rivalry from competitors of adult market, J&J can compete because Listerine Smart Rinse offers a unique combination of features at a value-added price. We are targeting specific segments in the consumer market, taking advantage of opportunities indicated by increasing purchasing power and awareness of healthy lifestyle, which includes oral care hygiene. The primary marketing......

Words: 6919 - Pages: 28

Free Essay

Bmw and Merc

...1.Idea Generations 1. Listerine Colour Changing Mouthwash 2. Listerine Mouth Spray 3. Listerine Gum 4. Listerine Animal Mouth wash 5. Listerine Teeth Whitening mouthwash 6. Listerine Plaque eraser 7. Listerine Tar removal 8. Listerine Bubblegum flavour for kids 9. Listerine toothpaste 10. Listerine Body wash 11. Listerine female hygiene 12. Listerine teeth wipes 13. Listerine dental floss 14. Listerine Facial wash 15. Listerine tongue cleaner 16. Listerine Nail Polish removal 17. Listerine Electronic Toothbrush 18. Listerine Shaving cream 19. Listerine Hand wash 20. Listerine deodorant 21. Listerine Saline Solution 22. Listerine Denture cleaner 23. Listerine Oral care Strips 2. Idea Screening Evaluation Criteria * Affordability * Oral care mouthwash * Convenience Kill germs Evaluation criteria | Measuring aspects | Remarks | | Costs | Affordability | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Listerine Oral Care Fine Mist 3. Concept Development and Testing Explain concept development and testing. Give examples. Consumers who use Listerine mouthwash are potential buyers for Oral Mouth fine mist Frontline staff / sales person Concierge / Customer related officers Benefits Maintain fresh breath Kill germs Easy to carry around Customers Most adults have bad breath occasionally, particularly when their mouth dries out after, say, a full night's sleep or a long,......

Words: 587 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Nteroffice Memorandum

... Gwen Hearst, Brand Manager for Scope® To: Brand Director of P&G CC: CEO; Scope® Business Team Subject: Recommendation for marketing plan of Scope® Brand Director, I have been reviewing the marketing data of Scope for the last few years and found that though Scope held a 32 percent share and kept the leader position of the Canadian mouthwash market for 1990, comparing to the previous data it revealed a decline tendency(Appendix I). In addition, Plax, a prebrushing rinse, had gained a 10 percent share of the product category and posed a threat to Scope. Faced with the inroads from Plax, the business team of Scope put forward their suggestions on the marketing plan. Now I will lay out our recommendations on what differentiating attribute should be focused on and all the rationale behind them to compete with other brands in Canadian mouthwash market.  Great-tasting and mouth-refreshing. For original Scope, I suggest that we keep focusing on “breathe refreshment and good tasting”. There are three main reasons. First, 40 percent of customers choose “it gets rid of bad breath” as their reason for using mouthwash, and Scope got a higher score in attribute of reducing bad breath comparing to other brands especially to Plax (Appendix II). On the other hand, though we can make a marketing improvement to add plaque-reduction claim to the future commercials, this may confuse current customers of Scope and that will be a huge strategic shift for the brand. On the......

Words: 455 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Focus Groups Plan for Scope

...participants are mouthwash products users. * Environment: The focus groups interview should have comfortable environment, with circle seating to make participants engage in discussion. Tape recording needed. * Moderator: Our main moderator should be skillful in group discussions, and be capable of establishing permissive environment. Pre-determined questions and adequate background knowledge required. But main moderator should exercise mild unobtrusive control the pace. Assistant moderator is in charge of handles logistics and takes careful notes. * Rules: Rules should be told to participants. No right or wrong answers; One person speaking at a time; Turn off mobile phones; Participants should talk and listen to each other. Beginning: In the beginning the moderator should create a thoughtful, permissive atmosphere, make ground rules and set the pace of the discussion. The introduction part includes: 1. Welcome; 2. Overview of the topic; 3. Ground rules; 4. First questions. Example: Good afternoon and welcome to our discussion session. Thanks for taking the time to join us to talk about mouthwash product in Canada. My name is xxx. We are helping Scope team get some information from customers about your perceptions of mouth wash products. We want to know what you like, what you don’t like, and how our product might be improved. We are having discussion like this with several groups in Canada. You were invited because you have used mouthwash products.......

Words: 674 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Marketng Research

...Morning Assignment 1 1/28/2016 Part 1 – Develop Advertising Copy The advertising copy I design for Scope is “Whisper a sweet breath”. This slogan will appear as text of a print, which will show on the package of mouthwash bottle. The reasons I use “Whisper a sweet breath” are as follow: First of all, this campaign matches the characteristics of Scope product. Since Scope wants to specifically target refreshment segment, which customers in this segment want to refresh mouth only because they do not suffer oral disease. In terms of functionality, I have to emphasize refresh breath rather than therapeutic. And obviously, whisper a sweet breath will deliver a message to customers that they can have sweet breath and approach to people closely without worry. The Scope mouthwash liquid will functions as a product that solve bad breath, a product that even enables customers to do something like whisper. The key to make Scope products popular is showing its ability to catch its target customers’ pain point and provide solution. Illustrating Scope products with a campaign that not only describes customers’ pain, but also give them hope to solve their pain; the advertising copy will make Scope even more attractive. Secondly, as we know, in most cases the purchases of mouthwash liquid are impulsive buying. According to consumer behavior theory, impulsive purchase is usually associates with low effort buying. Based on this, I think the advertising copy should be......

Words: 1174 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Hola

... PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Today, all people use a toothbrush and toothpaste, at least, to control their oral hygiene. In other cases, it is common to use mouthwash complementary products, which provide different advantages such as greater protection of the enamel, greater protection of the gums or simply fight against bad breath. The simple daily hygiene of our mouth, to analyze all the products to be consumed today, it seems expensive and requires a certain dedication. We intend to introduce the idea of ​​a product that solves these problems, characterized by: simplicity, effectiveness and comfort. To this end, we propose to take forward market a mouthwash that groups these features. We do not want to present a product as a substitute for a toothbrush, only an alternative for those who need a similar product. BOOMIX combines the advantages of a toothbrush, toothpaste and mouthwash in one product. Thanks to its accessibility and easy use, is proposed as a good alternative to brushing, with the advantages of stand alone in a container. Its use would be easy and simple as it is a mouthwash suitable for human consumption, which can be taken. Moreover, the advantage of BOOMIX is its use anywhere, because it is edible. The scope of BOOMIX not only covers the replacement of a brush, it is intended to provide a mouthwash that cleans the entire oral cavity (teeth, tongue, gums, ...), provide fresh breath, gum strengthening, protecting enamel (in contrast......

Words: 2188 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Marketing Mm522, Project

...Marketing Plan: Chewdent Keller Graduate School of Management MM522: Marketing Management Session: March 2010 Situation Analysis In the United States, 59% of adolescents, ages 12 to 19, have had cavities or tooth decay. 92% of adults between 20 and 64 have had dental cavities or tooth decay. What if you could clean your teeth without brushing your teeth? Imagine the impact that this would have on oral health care. We would like to introduce Chewdent, the new way to clean your teeth. Chewdent is a revolutionary new product that is as effective at cleaning teeth as brushing. It has all the benefits of brushing your teeth, using mouthwash and chewing gum in one package, but is less time consuming and leaves no waste product behind to discard. Chewdent will have a consistency similar to taffy and will clean an individual’s teeth by clinging to and removing debris from the teeth as the person chews on the product, while simultaneously giving them fresh breath. It will be a little bit larger than the size of chewing gum. However, unlike chewing gum, Chewdent will dissolve in the person’s mouth. Chewdent will initially come in three flavors, peppermint, spearmint and fruit punch, as these are the most popular flavors of chewing gum. Sometimes people are just too tired to brush their teeth at night or in too much of a rush to get ready in the morning. Other times, people would like to clean their teeth after eating, but it is just not convenient. With......

Words: 1988 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Scope P&G Case Study

...Scope was introduced in 1967 by Procter & Gamble, is a green mint tasting mouthwash, and was positions as a great tasting mouth refreshing brand that provided bad breath protection. Scope held 32% share of the Canadian market for 1990. In 1970 Scope became the market leader in Canada, with many competitors, such as Listerine mouthwash that was launched by Warner Lambert in 1977 and it was a direct competitor to Scope, it had nearly the same characteristics as Scope with a 12% of the market share during that time. But the major competitor for Scope was Plax, a brand by Pfizer Inc, which was launched in Canada in 1988 on a platform quite different from the traditional mouthwashes, and gained a 10% share since launched. Plax detergents were supposed to help loosen plaque to make brushing effective. Before the entry of Plax, brands in the mouth wash market were positioned around two major benefits that are fresh breath and killing germs, whereas Plax was positioned around a new benefit as a plaque fighter and claims Plax removes up to three times more plaque than just brushing alone. In studying the current situation and preparing for a strategic plan, Gwen Hearst reviewed the available information and surveys for the mouthwash market and Scope showed that 75% of Canadian household use 1 or more mouthwash brands. The company’s market research revealed that users could be segmented to “heavy” users that comprised 40% of all users and to “medium” users that comprised 45% of......

Words: 812 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

P&G Case, Scope

...CASE Procter & Gamble, Inc. Scope As Gwen Hearst looked at the year-end report, she was pleased to see that Scope held a 32 percent share of the Canadian mouthwash market for 1990. She had been concerned about the inroads that Plax, a prebrushing rinse, had made in the market. Since its introduction in 1988, Plax had gained a 10 percent share of the product category and posed a threat to Scope. As brand manager, Hearst planned, developed, and directed the total marketing effort for Scope, Procter & Gamble's (P&G) brand in the mouthwash market. She was responsible for maximizing the market share, volume, and profitability of the brand. Until the entry of Plax, brands in the mouthwash market were positioned around two major benefits: fresh breath and killing germs. Plax was positioned around a new benefit-as a "plaque fighter"-and indications were that other brands, such as Listerine, were going to promote this benefit. The challenge for Hearst was to develop a strategy that would ensure the continued profitability of Scope in the face of these competitive threats. Her specific task was to prepare a marketing plan for P&G's mouthwash business for the next three years. It was early February 1991, and she would be presenting the plan to senior management in March. ■ COMPANY BACKGROUND Based on a philosophy of providing products of superior quality and......

Words: 3308 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Procter & Gamble, Inc. Scope

...CASE Procter & Gamble, Inc. Scope As Gwen Hearst looked at the year-end report, she was pleased to see that Scope held a 32 percent share of the Canadian mouthwash market for 1990. She had been concerned about the inroads that Plax, a prebrushing rinse, had made in the market. Since its introduction in 1988, Plax had gained a 10 percent share of the product category and posed a threat to Scope. As Brand Manager, Hearst planned, developed, and directed the total marketing effort for Scope, Procter & Gamble’s (P&G) brand in the mouthwash market. She was responsible for maximizing the market share, volume, and profitability of the brand. Until the entry of Plax, brands in the mouthwash market were positioned around two major benefits: fresh breath and killing germs. Plax was positioned around a new benefit—as a “plaque fighter”—and indications were that other brands, such as Listerine, were going to promote this benefit. The challenge for Hearst was to develop a strategy that would ensure the continued profitability of Scope in the face of these competitive threats. Her specific task was to prepare a marketing plan for P&G’s mouthwash business for the next three years. It was early February 1991, and she would be presenting the plan to senior management in March. ■ COMPANY BACKGROUND Based on a philosophy of providing products of superior quality and value that best fill the needs of consumers, Procter & Gamble is one of the most successful consumer goods companies in the world...

Words: 5598 - Pages: 23

Free Essay

Scope Case

...Professor Pollack Marketing Strategies Scope Case This case has to do with the mouth rinse, Scope, at a time when there was fierce competition in the Canadian and American mouthwash industry. The introduction of Plax, a pre-brush rinse, was one of the most significant products that Proctor & Gamble faced. According to the case, in the past three years, the Canadian mouthwash industry faced quite a few changes. Market share data had revealed that there was a substantial difference in the share held by Scope in food stores. Wholesale clubs were accounting for a greater share of mouthwash sales in the industry. Also, total media spending of all brands in 1990 was $5 million, with Scope, Listerine, and Plax accounting for 90% of all advertising. It is evident that the amount of competition had increased by this time which drove each brand to increase its advertising efforts. Until 1987, the mouthwash market had grown an average of 3 percent per year for the past 12 years. Also, Listerine had not received the consumer product seal given by the Canadian Dental Association because the association was not convinces that a mouth rinse could be of therapeutic value. There has been a significant change in numbers over the past three years. A few other changes include the taste and credibility of the rinses themselves. In early 1987, favors were introduced by a number of brands including Scope. This greatly expanded the market although it did not significantly make an......

Words: 561 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Proctor and Gamble Scope Case Analysis

...Proctor and Gamble Scope Case Analysis 1) What significant changes have occurred in the Canadian mouthwash market in the past three years? The mouthwash market had grown on an average increase of 3% per year for 12 years. Then in 1987, with the introduction of new flavors it shot up 26%, and after that it continued at a steady increase of 5% per year. Originally, Listerine was the market leader. It positioned itself as a germ killing mouthwash that eliminated bad breath. Scope was introduced in 1967 as a green, mint-tasting mouthwash that was mouth refreshing and provided bad breath protection. Scope branded itself not only protection to bad breath, but also that it tasted better than the other mouthwashes available. Competitors of Scope were launched such as Listermint, which held 12% of the market, and Cepacol, which held 14% of the market share. Other major changes in the market included Listerine started to shift its strategy to include that it not only helps bad breath but also fights plaque and prevents inflamed gums. Fluoride was also added and Listermint obtained the seal of the Canadian Dental Association. Many different flavors of mouthwash were introduced into the market. This expanded the market but did not increase of particular brands market share. Colgate Fluoride Rinse was also launched into the market in 1988, however it did not gain any significant market share. In 1988, Plax was created and had immediate success. It was unique because it positioned itself...

Words: 1217 - Pages: 5