Free Essay

Nuclear Energy Advantages and Disadvantages

In: Other Topics

Submitted By fabiete
Words 1580
Pages 7
Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the pro-nuclear and the pro-renewable energy lobbies.
There are many doubts as to the reliability of fossil fuels and their ability to keep up with the rapid world population growth. This second concern arises as the availability of fossil fuels is declining and many other sources are being suggested as time advances. Moreover, people agree that fossil fuels contribute to global warming as it releases many greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, enhancing the greenhouse effect. Nuclear and renewable energy lobbies are these alternatives, which seem appealing due to their numerous advantages. Nonetheless, there have some weaknesses to consider.

Regarding pro-renewable lobbies, environmentally they are the best solution without doubt. Renewable energy is helpful for the environment as it seeks to tackle the enhanced greenhouse effect. As the greenhouse gases released by this form of energy are low, people support these lobbies. Not only do locals support these initiatives, but also tourism would grow, as the ‘clean environment’ would attract foreigners. Furthermore, these lobbies approach the future in a sustainable manor. Sustainability is meeting the today needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Renewables are those capable of natural regeneration over a human timescale, and are infinite in human terms.

Nevertheless, there are some weaknesses such as the efficiency of these energy sources, as they depend on climate. Wind Power, for example, is not always available. In areas where wind is not frequently strong, the amount of energy produced is small, which suggests that the investment will not be successful. The same happens with solar energy. Also, there are many countries, which cannot access this form of energy because the cost of renewable energy sources is significantly high.

The pro-nuclear lobbies are becoming powerful and it may be that this source of energy will substitute fossil fuels in the future. Nuclear organizations are exposing more strength to their projects each time, for example, the fact that they emit nearly no greenhouse gases. This is an important factor for the campaigns to gain popularity because today, people are very concerned with the enhanced global warming and a way of dealing with this problem urges. Nuclear power comes from Uranium, a recyclable fuel that allows it to be used repeatedly if it is managed carefully. For instance, nuclear waste in the USA is over 90% Uranium. Also, nuclear power plants can be sited almost anywhere, unlike some fossil fuels like oil, which has to be imported by many nations from the Middle East like Iran. Consequently, this would allow countries to be energy independent, which is a main target for many as they seek for more reliable and productive energy sources. If these nuclear power plants turn out to be efficient, the economic boost would be significant.

However, nuclear power plats have economic and political issues. Not only is it costly to build, but also to maintain and manage in order to be able to reuse this energy in the future. This arises doubts as to the economic ability to gain benefits once the nuclear power pant is put into use. Most countries cannot afford this investment, calculated in medium-term investment of up to 10 years. On the political side, waste products are dangerous and need to be carefully stored. Nuclear weapons may lead to conflicts between countries as they can be seen as a threat to a possible attack in the future. Moreover, as nuclear energy triggers energy independence, in the countries where this source is unavailable it will be complicated to obtain nuclear power plants.

In conclusion, although the pro-renewable and pro-nuclear lobbies have a few negatives, it is evident that these schemes will overtake fossil fuels as, overall, they provide more efficient and sustainable approaches towards future energy and they are more environmentally friendly. Global warming is a very serious matter and the solution to tackle the induced greenhouse effect seems to have arrived, providing energy efficiency at the same time.

Summaries the broad issues facing countries as they decide on their 'energy futures'.
Today, countries are concerned with the future energy sources as the availability of fossil fuels declines and new schemes are being suggested. In order to decide the sources of energy each nation will use, governors need to take into account several factors such as energy supplies, economic costs, environmental impacts and public opinion. Today, fossil fuels dominate global energy sources, however, thing may change in the next few decades.

The main factor to consider is the availability of each energy resource, or what is the same, energy supply. Fossil fuels supplies are diminishing, and concerns arise as to the ability of the supplies available to keep up with the increasing population. In developing countries, energy demand rises constantly so the supply must be increasing. As the country develops, more reserves of resources are found. Countries in the Middle East, like Iran, have huge reserves of oil and therefore do not have to worry for the future sources. In developed countries, renewables are more likely to dominate future energy, as they are more environmentally friendly and economically beneficial.

On the economic side of energy, some countries struggle to supply sustainable energy. Renewable energy schemes are very attractive to most countries, however, they are highly expensive to build and maintain and not all nations can afford it. This is one of the most important factors for governments to decide. Although it is costly, countries, which can afford renewable energy, see this as a medium-term investment. If they are confident that they will regain the money invested, this could be a good alternative to fossil fuels. Countries with surplus energy sources tend to export part of their reserves in order to have an economic boost, such as China, which exports much coal due to its enormous reserves.

Furthermore, environmental impacts must be considered. Global warming is becoming a larger issue, as greenhouse gas emissions are constantly high. Fossil fuels contribute highly to the enhanced greenhouse effect and renewable energy offers a very 'clean' scheme. This is a favorable factor for renewables. Also, taking into account the green tax in some places, emitting many greenhouse gases will result in economic, social and environmental issues.

Public opinion is quite a strong point because governors seek for re-election and for this they must keep the citizens happy. However, it is not the strongest factor so, even if the people aren’t in favor, countries will proceed to take the most favorable decision overall.

In conclusion, these four factors are determinant for countries to decide on their future energy sources; energy availability is crucial; economically, it must be beneficial; it must be helpful for the environment; and finally, if possible, citizens must be content. With all these factors together, governors may decide whether using renewable sources or fossil fuels is more convenient for their country for the future.

To date, how effectively are international, national and local decision-making each playing their part in deciding energy futures?
In order to decide the energy futures of countries, action must be taken in different scales. International decisions, such as those taken by TNCs, are the most important, followed by national ideas and finally local suggestions, such as councils and consumers. Generally, local and national decisions will depend on the ones agreed by the international groups. How effectively are these groups taking action is a different issue to consider.

International decision-making is exposing many appealing suggestions regarding the energy futures. For example, as the availability of fossil fuels is depleting, many groups are trying to develop renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power to produce electricity. This initiative seems to be efficient and people look forward to it with optimism.

On the other hand, some initiatives to help the environment such as the Kyoto Protocol failed. Their goal was to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by introducing some limitations to different countries. However, the failure was yielded from three things; surplus emissions were allowed to be traded, which was seen as a way to increase emissions not reduce them; people thought that all countries should have the same emissions limit; and the USA didn't join the initiative, which made people see it as a weak organization. Furthermore, the Middle East countries are trying to encourage others to continue with oil, as they want to safeguard their interests due to their massive oil reserves.

On a national scale, it depends on the ruling government. Their approach to solving the high levels of emissions and assure sustainable energy sources in the future starts with embracing energy diversification, offering new types such as renewables. To know if they are effective we must wait to see if renewable energy succeeds in the decades to come.

Finally, locals suggest smaller projects with not much magnitude because they don’t cause a great impact if we compare it with the transcendence of the international initiatives. Consumers have contributed positively by putting pressure on governments and other lobbies to persuade them to pass onto renewable energy instead of fossil fuels. Although they do contribute in a small scale, they continue to have a small influence.

In conclusion, international organizations have the most influence regarding the decisions made towards the energy futures and are working hard and effectively. National decisions depend on the governments and their political ideology, whilst locals are also working hard to leave fossil fuels behind despite their small influence.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Nuclear Energy

...Nuclear Energy and its importance in context of India Every single atom in the universe carries an unimaginably powerful battery within its heart, called the nucleus. This form of energy, often called Type-1 fuel, is hundreds of thousands, if not million, times more powerful than the conventional Type-0 fuels, which are basically dead plants and animals existing in the form of coal, petroleum, natural gas and other forms of fossil fuel. I. Terminology - Nuclear fission –splitting of atoms to produce energy in the form of heat. Uranium a naturally occurring radioactive metal - only element in which fission(splitting off nucleus) can take place easily, setting off a chain reaction or a self-sustained splitting of atoms. The atoms of Uranium are the largest and the heaviest known on earth so its nucleus is unstable. Besides uranium, plutonium can undergo fission. Fertile material – composed of atoms which do not undergo induced fission themselves but fissile material can be generated from them by irradiation in a nuclear reactor. E.g. U- 238 gives plutonium 239, TH- 232 gives U-233, and U-234 gives U-235. Criticality – When the chain reaction takes place for the first time in a nuclear electricity reactor, it means the reactor has reached its first criticality. Moderator – used to slowdown neutrons surrounding the fuel core of the reactor,e.g.Light water, heavy water (D2O) Pressurised Heavy Water reactor (PWHR) –fuel used is natural uranium. Heavy water is both coolant and...

Words: 2000 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Nuclear Energy

...Given past events, nuclear power technology is seen by many people as the means to make war, death, bombs, and destruction. These are comparitive rarities to the good that nuclear energy poses for our future, and its capacity for clean efficient energy generation. Almost all of the energy produced today from nuclear is in the form of electricity, comprising 16% of global production. The number doesn't seem to be that large, but when taking into account the energy used on the entire planet, and the capacity to better the nuclear industry for the future we find ourselves wondering how vital it really is to our livelyhood. One could say that the development of nuclear is vital because of global warming threats. Since our combustion of fossil fuels produces carbon in the atmosphere, resulting in rising heat over time. Nuclear provides a form of noncombusting renewable energy that if prudently researched and implemented provides an alternative to polluting engines of the past. This warming fear is a large reason nuclear power is a growing idea. The technology is not simple to do, the production is a very meticulous process, wielding great power for good and great danger. The process requires strong regulation. With such a high risk, high reward scenario, we as humanity's hope for a better tomorrow must weigh the pros and cons to find if we are able to prudently expand and increase research towards safety and efficiency. Producing nuclear energy is not as simple as taking it......

Words: 2406 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Nuclear Energy

...Whitney Turntine Februrary 17, 2014 Environmental Science Nuclear Energy It seems that the world as a whole is in search of an energy source that is cleaner, cheaper, and more efficient. This seems to be particularly true in the United States where the government seeks to separate themselves from their reliance on petroleum from countries including those in the Middle East. They are unfortunately, less concerned with environmental issues than it is with issues of power, money, and dominance. Either way, nuclear energy is one of the better alternative energy sources. There are currently 65 commercially operating nuclear power plants with 104 nuclear reactors in 31 states around the country. Thirty-six of the plants have two or more reactors. These plants have generated about 20% of U.S. electricity each year since 1990. Nuclear fisson is performed by fusion of hydrogen into helium. This is done using uranium, plutonium, or thorium and placing them in the reactor, which start a chain reaction that can produce vast amounts of energy. Uranium is the element primarily used in reactors. The fission of a one atom can produce 10 million times the amount of energy that an atom can produce that is burned from coal. Uranium is an abundant element which is easily found and extracted. It often has to undergo a relatively cheap refining process, however, as the isotopes are found mixed in nature. Nuclear fission is also relatively clean, as there is no excess CO2 produced, as there is......

Words: 1252 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Nuclear Energy

...Should our reliance on nuclear energy sources be expanded in an effort to fuel the future? Today there is a great concern about our carbon emissions and other pollutants because of their adverse affects on our climate. Thus alternative sources of energy are being sought out, such as solar, wind, natural gas, and nuclear energy. Many have found themselves opposing nuclear due to past errors, waste management, safety features, and financial concerns. However, these issues are being addressed as promising new reactors are being designed. Nuclear energy has some clear benefits when compared to some of the drawbacks of other methods. Natural gas will most likely release too much carbon dioxide in the long run to be effective, wind and solar energy are too intermittent and costly to function as a large-scale solution, and hydropower may not be able to expand easily easily enough to make a lasting difference (“Why We Still Need Nuclear Power”). With very little carbon dioxide emissions, relatively cheap energy generation, and an impressive reliability record, nuclear power proves itself to be an option to be explored in a country where electricity generation emits more carbon dioxide than transportation or industry. There are many safety concerns surrounding nuclear energy, but the industry has learned a lot from previous mistakes and many new safety measures are being tested and implemented (“Nuclear Now”). Previous failings with nuclear power, such as the Fukushima disaster,...

Words: 1066 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear Power

...Nuclear power debate – Is it worth using nuclear energy? According to the Interdisciplinary Study of Massachusetts Institute of Technology “Around 6% of the world’s energy and 14% of the world’s electricity is produced by nuclear power”. In the United States, 1 in 5 households and business are electrically powered by nuclear energy. This number is even higher in Europe, where a third of the electricity produced comes from nuclear energy. Though, there is always a strong controversy through the public over the usage of this type of energy. Opponents mainly point out the safety issue, waste management problems in dealing with radioactive residuals and the threat of possible leakage. Despite their arguments, I strongly believe that the benefits of nuclear power usage far outweigh the disadvantages and it is the most economically feasible and environmentally friendly way of producing energy. Some people feel that nuclear power represents the danger to the world in a form of possible nuclear warfare. They state, that many politically unstable countries like Iran, North Korea and Pakistan launch nuclear power programs but behind these programs there is an aim of creating the weapon of mass destruction. Fortunately, despite the fact, that US intelligence agencies suspected explosives to be tested on one of the Iran’s nuclear sites, inspection revealed no signs of possible threat there. Apart from it, historical facts show that while there have been wars in recent decades,......

Words: 1097 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Nuclear Energy

...Nuclear Energy In the article Bad Reactors, Mariah Blake argues that there are problems with the resurgence of nuclear energy as a viable option to our increasing energy demands. Blake discusses the fact that new nuclear construction projects are still prone to the same delays and multi-billion cost overruns that the industry was plagued with decades ago. She also discusses the financial risk involved with the companies that build or finance the reactors and the financial burdens put on the American taxpayers. Blake also keys in on the problem that the huge subsidies given to the nuclear energy industry is crowding out the growth of the renewable energy industry such as wind and solar. Ethos Mariah Blake is an editor of the Washington Monthly. Her research support for this article was provided by the Investigative Fund of the Nation Institute. Throughout the article Blake makes an effective argument. She supports her argument by giving a detailed account of a nuclear reactor construction site that is plagued with problems in Finland. She relates this current problem in Finland to the problems that she believes will occur again in the United States. She focuses on not only the financial burden this industry will put on the American people but also the politics involved in the process. Blake gives several facts and figures to back up her argument. Pathos Blake makes several valid points during her argument. She demonstrates the emotional appeal......

Words: 891 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Nuclear Energy as an Alternative Energy for the Future

...Can nuclear energy be a main alternative energy socio-economically rather than other alternative energy to decrease global warming? Introduction Nowadays it seems that most people recognize about the severity of global warming. Houghton (1997) believes that increasing alternative energy rather than using fossil fuels is very important to decrease global warming. Therefore, I chose this topic: Can nuclear energy be a main alternative energy socio-economically rather than other alternative energy to decrease global warming? This assignment will identify why serious global warming started and discuss about nuclear energy as an alternative energy. Finally, it will be examined how people think about nuclear energy used to decrease global warming. Global warming by human activity According to Houghton (1997), since Industrial Revolution fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas are being burnt worldwide rapidly and a lot of carbon dioxide from burning the fossil fuels is promoting global warming. Giddens (1998) stated that many scientists believe the main cause of global warming is carbon dioxide increased. Carbon dioxide which is one of green house gas such as methane, water vapour and nitrous oxide absorbs heat and then re-emit on the earth. So, with carbon dioxide increase, temperature rises on the earth (Carter, 2010) Wyatt (2008) stated that “Industrial revolution stimulated a major increase in production and mass consumption. The ancient sources of......

Words: 1250 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Nuclear Energy

...Nuclear energy is one of the most controversial forms of energy known to man. Its disadvantages are widely known and criticized, such as the nuclear wastes released from the power plants, the virtually impossible disposal of the wastes, the potential for terrorist attacks on these power plants, and the unbelievably high price needed to even build a power plant. Although the risks outweigh the benefits, nuclear plants may be needed because of the fact that they are the cleanest way of producing energy without any environmental drawbacks. Overall, nuclear energy is and will always be a continuous topic for discussion and debate whether you are for it or against it. In the heart of any nuclear power plant lies the reactor. A reactor is a device used to control nuclear reactions so that the energy created and released by the reactions can be converted to a useful form at a constant rate. There are two types of reactors used in the modern world these reactors are called fission reactors and breeder reactors, fission reactors are work by separating a fissionable Uranium-235 from a non-fissionable Uranium-238 by using a very complex process, after this process a new more “enriched” form of uranium is produced that contains 3% of Uranium 235, this new substance is used to make ......

Words: 1233 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Nuclear Energy

...with the sufficient supply of energy in this currently developing world. However as the supplies of oil which is the major source for energy is decreasing and people are becoming more environmentally cautious, a new mean to supply energy are in high demand. Thus, nuclear energy seems to be the ideal alternative source of energy. Mel Schwartz (2011) mentioned that nuclear energy has generated approximately 17% of the world electricity for nearly 1 billion people (p. 706). In the Encyclopedia Britannica described that, “Nuclear energy, also called atomic energy, energy that is released in significant amounts in processes that affect atomic nuclei, the dense cores of atoms” (“Nuclear Energy”, 2013). The term nuclear energy includes nuclear fusion, nuclear fission and nuclear decay (radioactivity). Nuclear fission is the main method used in providing the nuclear energy as is provides the most energy compare to nuclear fusion and nuclear decay. In order to provide a large amount of energy, nuclear power plant is built. By using the heat energy gained from nuclear reaction, it drives the steam turbines which in turns generate the electricity. Nuclear power plant could be environment friendly as it emits low amount of carbon dioxide. The nuclear waste should not be overlook as it has a very long term impact to the environment. PHYSICS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY Nuclear energy can be formed either by nuclear fission, nuclear fusion or nuclear decay. Nuclear fission is the......

Words: 1393 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Disadvantage of Nuclear Power

...The Uncertainty and Disadvantage of Nuclear Power NE 471 Dr.Chang South Carolina State University ANTRON CALDWELL ABSTRACT The future global economy is likely to consume increasing amounts of energy considering the increasing demand for cheap, clean and reliable energy from developing countries such as India and China. Though there are technologies capable of supplying this energy these energy sources come at the expense of increased ozone damaging CO2 emissions. CO2 emissions are believed to be a significant contributor to the rise in the average temperature of the Earth’s climate known as global warming. In the United States electric power plants emit about 2.2 billon tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) each year, which is about 40% of the nation’s total carbon emissions (NRDC, 2014). It is generally accepted by climate scientist that if annual carbon emissions are not reduced by at least 80% by the year 2030 then there will be an increase of greater than 2°C (35.2°F) which is considered an acceptable safe level or approximately 4°C (39.2°F) by the year 2100 in the Earth’s climate temperature (Carrington, 2013). These increases in the Earth’s temperature would be catastrophic, however measures taken by the government through the Clean Air Act to regulate emissions from stationary and mobile sources, and groups such as the National Resource Defense Council (NRDC) have somewhat reduced the emissions from stationary sources such as power plants and mobile sources......

Words: 4804 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Nuclear Energy

...Nuclear Energy Energy cannot be created nor be destroyed but it can be converted from one form to another. Nearly all the mass of the atom is concentrated in a tiny nucleus in the centre. The nucleus is composed principally of two sorts of particles: the proton which carries the positive charge and the neutron which is electrically neutral and has a mass slightly bigger than that of proton. Nuclear energy is the energy released from the nucleus of an atom. When a nuclear reaction occurs whether fission or fusion, it produces large amounts of energy. How Nuclear Energy is produced When the heaviest element, uranium was bombarded with neutrons, it was discovered that instead of inducing radioactivity as did other elements, something different happened. This process was named fission. When fission occurred, not only were two lighter elements and a lot of radiation produced, but also more neutrons. It was clear that these neutrons could in turn also cause fission, producing more neutrons and developing a chain reaction which might spread throughout all the uranium present. In the fission of uranium 235 nucleus, the amount of energy released is about 60,000,000 times as much as when a carbon atom burns. Most of the energy from fission appears as kinetic energy as the fission products shoot apart and quickly share their energy with their surroundings, thus producing heat. The first reactors to produce a usable amount of power were built at Calder hall in England. With pure...

Words: 771 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear Power

...Advantages and disadvantages of nuclear power Nuclear energy represents only 15% of the electricity produced worldwide. though in France, 80% of its electricity production is from nuclear. Although nuclear is unrenewable because it uses uranium for fission reactions, it is very sustainable. Sustainability is the quality where today’s demands are met without compromising the environment, economy or culture for future generations. Nuclear energy is a carbon zero energy resource that is clean and is very reliable and efficient because you do not have to depend on vast amounts of natural resources or other sustainable energy that are condition dependant like wind energy or solar. The fission reactions in nuclear energy produce huge quantities of energy in a short amount of time so can easily fit the demand for energy, although very expensive equipment like is needed to initiate the reaction and safely harness the energy produced. Countries like France can produce the energy in excess and export it for over $3 billion a year. The nuclear plants themselves take between 10 and 15 years to construct and there is a large cost of decommissioning and disposal of the radioactive uranium. Generally the nuclear plants are very stable and safe; however there can be the possibility of nuclear disaster like Chernobyl in 1986 severe possible health risks, also being susceptible to terrorism. The plant can be constructed anywhere but needs suitable technology, which isn’t always available...

Words: 268 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Nuclear Energy

...Some may ask what nuclear energy is, the dictionary defines this as: 1. The energy released by a nuclear reaction, especially by fission or fusion. 2. Nuclear energy regarded as a source of power. Also called atomic energy Nuclear power was first known to be researched in the early 1900's, and by the world war; it reached its greatest peak by demonstrating to the world its power to destroy. Nuclear energy can be good or bad, depending on how the person works with this material; it is used for both sides good and bad. Scientists were unsure from the beginning of how it was possible to get energy from the material called Uranium. They were sure that with its uniqueness it would be able to transform itself into different elements. So they were unsure of it for many years, until Albert Einstein he explored the world of nuclear energy. In 1905 he released his theory of the famous equation e=mc2 with this he knew that uranium was able to create masses of electricity. A few years later, scientists found out the great power of the atomic energy. Since then, both scientist and the public were unable to find the best fit for nuclear energy in our society. We have put it into power plants, but the government and public were disappointed by accidents. We have put it into war, and with it we have caused great damages. So the question is where can this energy go? Even though it has been discovered to be the greatest power source of the world today, nobody is willing......

Words: 1302 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Nuclear Energy

...Nuclear Energy Jackie Johnson SCI 207 Dependence of men on the environment Haleh Keshtker Jan. 29,2012 Nuclear Energy Will the Chernobyl nuclear is the large environmental disaster caused by the meltdown at the nuclear power plant near Chernobyl, Ukraine, dramatically changed the world’s opinion about using nuclear power reaction for power. But se the Chernobyl nuclear power plant was built the wooded marshlands of northern, Ukraine, approximately 80 miles north of Kiev. But see the first reactor went online in 1977, but the second in 1978, third in 1981, and the last in 1983, two more were planned for construction ( Ask.com 20th century History). See the media is comparing the threat to Chernobyl and some politicians are calling nuclear for a complete moratorium on the spread of nuclear energy. This is nothing more than sensationalist fearmonering. But see the Chernobyl disaster was caused by the absurd inefficiencies of the soviets and massive flaws in the power plants design. Here is something that is should the container be breached the Japanese government already has things in place to pour concrete over it as was don’t to contain Chernobyl. But see it is not right for Nuclear energy to work there butts off to help out in this world if Japanese government wants to power concrete over everything before they ask the rest of the world if they want that to happen. But see it is worth noting that the facility itself was fairly aged- Forty years, I read in one......

Words: 425 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Nuclear Energy

...Can Nuclear Energy Be the Answer? It is only possible to mitigate global warming if the world-wide consumption of fossil fuels can be drastically reduced in the next 10 to 15 years. There is simply no room for a scenario as it is depicted by Lester R. Brown in the book Plan B 4.0 Mobilizing to Save Civilization. The scenario plays out like a horror movie, poverty, depleted water supply, food shortages, terrorism, over population, disastrous floods, erratic changes in ocean currents and global warming. What is causing global warming? Carbon dioxide and other air pollution that is collecting in the atmosphere like a thickening blanket, trapping the sun's heat and causing the planet to warm up. Coal-burning power plants are the largest United States source of carbon dioxide pollution -- they produce 2.5 billion tons every year. Automobiles, the second largest source, create nearly 1.5 billion tons of CO2 annually. (Valentinas Mickūnaitis) The good news is there are many technologies that exist today to allow cars to operate more efficiently and use less gas. In order to reduce the amount of toxins in the atmosphere, older power plants need to be modernized and we need to reduce our electricity by putting into practice energy efficiency, these are just some suggestions to lowering the levels of CO2, we have to make sure they are implemented. Politicians are especially attracted to the restoration of nuclear power as a possible solution to averting global warming. When......

Words: 3024 - Pages: 13