P&G Scope

In: Business and Management

Submitted By sheyh
Words 936
Pages 4

Procter & Gamble creates a collaborative community
Teamcenter lifecycle collaboration technology offers a quick, cost-effective way to extend the reach of product knowledge to the consumer product giant’s entire enterprise and huge supplier base
Siemens PLM Software www.siemens.com/plm Issues:
Support innovation among geographically dispersed development teams Speed time-to-market and reduce costs Provide virtual 3D design reviews

P RO C T E R & G A M B L E
To optimize the effectiveness of distributed product development teams, Procter & Gamble needed a collaborative strategy that included everyone.

A geographically dispersed giant
Procter & Gamble (P&G) is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of consumer packaged goods. The company markets nearly 300 brands to approximately five billion consumers in more than 160 countries. To address the needs of its worldwide customer base, P&G employs a widely distributed product development strategy. P&G employees at the Cincinnati headquarters collaborate with other P&G personnel and suppliers located all over the world. Their goal: cost effectively create innovative products to improve the lives of consumers globally and introduce them to the market ahead of the competition. Key to making a distributed development strategy successful is a collaboration environment that includes all players. This was difficult to achieve in the past. Although the standard corporate desktop environment included some collaborative tools, it did not support easy sharing of 3D visual product data. Yet this type of data – product and package models, label artwork, equipment, analysis and layout diagrams, process schematics and so on – are vital elements of P&G’s design process. Although P&G had implemented ways to facilitate the sharing of this information among those who created it, the company also needed a broader…...

Similar Documents

P&G Case

...Australia, New Zealand, India, Pakistan, Philippines, Indonesia, Taiwan, Japan, Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia are all managed by P&G’s Asia-Pacific Regional Headquarters in Hongkong. P&G-Asia’s major brands include Pampers, Always, Head and Shoulders, Rejoice, Oil of Ulan, Clearasil, Camay, Zest and Vicks. One of the P&G subsidiaries in Asia is in Singapore. P&G-Singapore which has 70 staff is headed by a managing director which is also responsible for Malaysian operations. Feminine pads/napkins are one of the products that are being produced by P&G. Always, a brand of feminine pad that was introduced in three lead markets (i.e. U.S., Saudi Arabia & Singapore) in 1983 was an initial success. When introduced in Japan, P&G was blocked from using Always because of trademark reasons. Because of this, the name Whisper was used instead and luckily it was successful. In 1988, competition in the feminine pad market is composed of three major competitors: Kimberly Clark’s Kotex (35% market share) , P&G’s Always (25%) and Kau Laurier (20%). Eight other brands competed for the remaining market share. P&G was the largest market spender in 1989 where it outspent Kotex and Kao five and four times respectively. They spent two thirds of their media budgets in television, one third in print. The three are evenly matched in product line breadth. However, P&G believed that Always was superior in absorption capability, protection and comfort. Other comparisons were as......

Words: 1418 - Pages: 6

P&G Supply Chain

...CASE STUDY December 2002 Procter & Gamble: Building A Smarter Supply Chain Issue/Solution To remain profitable, consumer products manufacturers must find ways to optimize the performance of their supply chains. They need to support marketing promotions better and avoid frustrating consumers with out-of-stock situations in the store. Situation • Procter & Gamble realized it needed a “consumer-driven supply network” to stay ahead in the consumer packaged goods industry. Retailing’s “first moment of truth” is a key focus area for P&G. When the shopper reaches the shelf, is the product there? • Discoveries • • Links between supply chain and CRM processes are critical. Business leads, technology follows. But the technology must be proven, practical and scalable. Even with immature solutions, it is possible to get rapid payback on streamlined demand and fulfillment processes for critical products. A harmonized ERP applications backbone is a basic requirement. • • Recommendations • Secure management support before you start redesigning your supply network. Don’t let politics condemn the initiative to failure. Leverage the value IT can bring in connecting demand and supply side business processes. Simplify your applications architecture to allow collaborative business processes and cope with changes in network alliances. • • Dig Deeper • • • Related Research from GartnerG2 Gartner Core Research Methodology Maria Jimenez with Derek......

Words: 3062 - Pages: 13

P&G Case

...P&G Case Executive Summary This case study analysis is on the Proctor & Gamble Company (also referred to as “P&G”). Procter & Gamble is the world's largest producer of household and personal products by revenue, with its products reaching 4 billion people worldwide. The Case Study includes an Introduction, Company Overview, Company Mandate, Internal Analysis, and External Analysis, followed by various Strategic Options (see below). The author then makes a Final Strategy Option Recommendation. Strategic Option #1: Market to Lower-Income Consumers in both Developed and Emerging Markets (Expand and Build Beauty Segment strictly aimed at Low-Income Consumers). Industry Consolidator. Strategic Option #2: Given the maturity of the North American/Western European market, combined with the emerging popularity and demand for Natural/Organic ingredient products, P&G should look to create New Natural Products and Products tailored to the Male market - Multiple Segments, not just Skin Care (Expand and Build Beauty Segment). Industry Consolidator. Strategic Option #3: Related Diversification through Acquisition. Strategic Option #4: Joint Ventures in Emerging Markets such as China and India. Final Strategy Recommendation: The Recommendation is to go for a combined Low-Income segment and New Natural Product strategy as this facilitates P&G’s need to capture a greater slice of the Low-Income consumer market both in Mature and Developing markets, which also capturing a......

Words: 3683 - Pages: 15

P&G- Scope Case Analysis

...and 1990, worldwide sales for P&G had increased by $8 billion and net earnings by $1.3 billion. This success was due to variety of factors, including the ability to develop truly innovative products to meet consumers’ needs. Of the many products introduced throughout the 3 years, Scope, mouthwash, held 34% of the Canadian mouthwash market. Although there was success, there had been concerns with competition and the major changes happening in the mouthwash market. Up until 1988, most mouthwash was marketed primarily on a “bad-breath” strategy. However, Listerine introduced a plaque and inflamed gums preventing mouthwash. New flavors were introduced by a number of brands and it greatly expanded the market in 1987. In 1988 Colgate launched a mouthwash that included fluoride to fight cavities with a mild taste that encouraged children to rinse longer and more often. Finally, Pfizer launched a “prebrushing” rinse called Plax. Although P&G’s Scope held over 30% of the market share in 1990, they recognized that the industry was changing. The market was indefinitely moving towards healthier alternative. 2. Scope’s performance during the past three years can be considered extremely successful. Although it is marginal, in 1988, Scope’s market share was 33% but by 1990 the percentage fell to 32.3%. During the slim decline, Plax’s market share jumped from 1% to 10% in two years. Therefore, the sudden growth in Plax’s sales should be a concern for P&G’s Scope. 3. There are currently......

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

P&G Outsourcing

...Associate Professor at The University of St. Thomas GEO IAOP’s Global Excellence in Outsourcing Award www.IAOP.org Best Practices in Outsourcing: The P&G Experience Introduction The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) markets a wide range of branded consumer goods products, including beauty care and household products. The company’s products are sold in more than 180 countries, with net sales exceeding USD 82B. With on-the-ground operations spread across 80 countries, meeting the business service needs of the organization was challenging. P&G’s Global Business Services (GBS) organization has met this challenge successfully; they have implemented best-in-class processes to provide business capabilities that create value for the business units, while reducing the costs and efforts necessary to support these operations. GBS is one of four organization pillars that support the organization’s business and provides more than 170 services to the company. The services delivered through GBS include everything from employee services (e.g. people management, facilities, communication, meeting services, and travel services) to business services (e.g. financial services and solutions, product innovation, supply network solutions). Many of those services are provided today through a set of alliance partnerships. The scope of the alliance management effort at GBS encompasses the entire outsourcing lifecycle of these outsourcing engagements; the goal is to create value for the......

Words: 3568 - Pages: 15

P&G Strategy

...expands the economics of scope of the organization; secondly, diversified business helps organization develop the market power. Similarly, Kotler & Armstrong (2008) also claimed that the diversification enable organization acquire business not only from current products and markets but also from outside. Moreover, diversification also assists organization to allocate tangible resource more efficiently. (Helfat and Eisenhardt, 2004) This essay will focus on the business running of Procter & Gamble in Singapore from 2005 to 2012. In 2005, P&G announced an acquisition of Gillette Company. (P&G annual report, 2005) After the acquisition, P&G acquired several new products from Gillette Company such as razors and blades and it obtained several new production lines from Gillette without the expenses on research and development. As a result of acquisition, the growth rate of net earnings of P&G in personal beauty area in 2005 was much higher than previous year. (P&G Annual Report, 2005) In this case, P&G used a related diversification strategy to increase its economics of scope. Meanwhile, since the Gillette Company is also one the most well-known company in personal beauty area, the market power of P&G had an obviously increasing in that year. According to Johnson, Scholes and Whittington (2008), synergy means that the activities or asset are more effective together than apart. Based on this acquisition, because of both P&G and Gillette had......

Words: 1302 - Pages: 6

P&G Case Study

...Outsourcing Award www.IAOP.org P&G: Taking Innovation to New Levels of Value through Partnership INTRODUCTION Many people believe innovation springs serendipitously from some kind of “aha” moment – literally a bolt out of the blue. P&G knows differently. Innovation has been the corporate lifeblood since P&G’s humble beginning in 1837 when William Procter and James Gamble signed a partnership agreement formalizing The Procter & Gamble Company. Today, P&G’s products touch and improve the lives of over 4.8 billion consumers in 180 countries. Fifty “Leadership Brands” include some of the world’s most well-known household names with 25 of these 50 brands each generating more than $1 billion in annual sales. Simply put, this degree of corporate growth could not be achieved without significant innovation across all aspects of the business even extending to our relationships with suppliers and partners. In 2001, P&G radically changed its approach to Research & Development (R&D). Instead of relying solely on its own, highly capable R&D resources, P&G welcomed ideas from individual entrepreneurs and scientists from other companies, and universities, the concept came to be known as Connect & Develop; the goal was to gain half the ideas from inside and half from outside the company. Connect and Develop brought many great ideas, but the question remained. How does a company like P&G drive innovation in its outsourcing efforts? After all, P&G’s outsourced service providers are......

Words: 4003 - Pages: 17

Comprehinsive Study of P & G

...awarded several contracts to supply soap and candles to the Union armies. These orders kept the factory busy day and night, building the Company's reputation as soldiers returned home with their P&G products. 1879 James Norris Gamble, son of the founder and a trained chemist, developed an inexpensive white soap equal to high-quality, imported castles. Inspiration for the soap's name—Ivory—came to Harley Procter, the founder's son, as he read the words "out of ivory palaces" in the Bible one Sunday in church. The name seemed a perfect match for the white soap's purity, mildness, and long-lasting qualities. 1882 Harley Procter convinced the partners to allocate $11,000 to advertise Ivory nationally for the first time. Ivory's purity and floating capability were first advertised across the country in the Independent, a weekly newspaper. 1886 Production began in the Ivorydale factory. Ivorydale replaced the Central Avenue plant, which was heavily damaged by fire in 1884. Designed by noted industrial architect Solon Beman, the plant incorporated the latest technological advances with a pleasant work environment for employees—a progressive approach at that time. 1887 To address the storm of local and national labor unrest, P&G instituted a pioneering profit-sharing program for factory workers. This voluntary program, conceived by William Cooper Procter, grandson of the founder, gave employees a stake in the......

Words: 8147 - Pages: 33

P & G Case

...Gwen Hearst is the brand manager for scope which is Proctor & Gamble’s brand of mouthwash. She is faced with intense competition following the entrance of Plax. Plax plans to position itself as a “plaque fighter” rather than the traditional position of “fresh breath” & “killing germs” and Gwen is confident that her competitors will follow suit and needs to figure out a way to position the product so that scope does not fall short of the competition. The major issue that concerned Hearst was how P&G should capitalize on the market segment within the rinse category that focused on “health related benefits” rather than Scopes traditional strategy. The constraints that scope has is that they would like to re-position themselves, but they are looked at as a “breath” brand and deterring from that could possibly make them lose out on market share. She is faced with three options to increase sales. They can either do nothing and hope that people with continue to prefer “breath” over “rinse”, they can add a product line extension, or they can add an entirely new product line to the mix. Since 1986, breath only products saw an enormous increase in market shares from 3% in 1986 to 26% in 1987 primarily due to the introduction of flavors in the mouthwash, however, since 1987, there have only been a 3-5% increase of market share. If Gwen does nothing, she may be faced with the market trend of consistently flat sales. Proctor & Gamble pride themselves as being viewed as...

Words: 1020 - Pages: 5

P&G Analysis

...advantage in functional value. 1.2 The sales people concerned that if they launched a product without enough difference from other products, retailers would replacing units within the existing line. The sale of Scope may decline, or P&G may pay 50000 per stock-keeping unit in listing fees to add the new brand. Either way was costly. 1.3 The Market Research people concerned that Adding reassurances to a product often takes time before consumer accepts the idea. 1.4 The Market Research people concerned that if they launched new products, the new one might cannibalize a large amount of Scope’s sales.(Like warner-lambert, they launched listermint but listermint’s market share "primarily at the expense of listerine and smaller brands") 1.5 The Finance people concerned that launching a line extension would cost a large amount of money. 1.6 The Purchasing people concerned that when P&G launched new product the price of ingredients would increased by 50% and the packaging costs would increase by 0.3 USD per unit. 2 High risk 2.1 The PDD people though it was not easy to replicate Plax’s clinical results with P&G’s stringent test methodology. 2.2 Market Research people concerned that the launch of new product might not increase competitive users’ desire to purchase Scope. 2.3 If P&g launched new product, other companies would also do the same thing.(Game Theory)...

Words: 296 - Pages: 2

P&G Company Evaluation

...its rate to about 1.0% by the end of 2016. Eurozone interest is unlikely to change in 2015 and 2016. Roughly Two thirds of The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G)’s revenue is from outside the United States. In fiscal 2015, net sales of all five-business segments were negatively affected by foreign currency fluctuations due to strong dollar, boosted by recovery of U.S. economy (See the table below). Company Overview P&G The Procter & Gamble Company, or P&G (PG), is the largest manufacturer and seller of household and personal products in the world, headquartered in the United States with market capital about $215 billion. Founders William Procter and James Gamble established P&G in 1837. It is geographically P&G Data Overview | 52-week Range | 65.02-85.11 | Volume | 12,061,500 | Market Cap | 223.80B | Dividend Yield | 3.26% | Industry | Personal Products | (Source: Yahoo Finance) Unilever Data Overview | 52-week Range | 43.87-44.66 | Volume | 3,296,033 | Market Cap | 126.47B | Dividend Yield | 2.98% | Industry | Personal Products | (Source: Yahoo Finance) 3-yr stock price UN PG diversified and manufactures and sells consumer goods in more than 180 countries and territories. P&G focuses on the following five business segments: * Fabric Care and Home Care including brands such as Ariel, Tide, and Downy; * Baby, Feminine and......

Words: 4062 - Pages: 17

Scope P&G Case Study

...Scope was introduced in 1967 by Procter & Gamble, is a green mint tasting mouthwash, and was positions as a great tasting mouth refreshing brand that provided bad breath protection. Scope held 32% share of the Canadian market for 1990. In 1970 Scope became the market leader in Canada, with many competitors, such as Listerine mouthwash that was launched by Warner Lambert in 1977 and it was a direct competitor to Scope, it had nearly the same characteristics as Scope with a 12% of the market share during that time. But the major competitor for Scope was Plax, a brand by Pfizer Inc, which was launched in Canada in 1988 on a platform quite different from the traditional mouthwashes, and gained a 10% share since launched. Plax detergents were supposed to help loosen plaque to make brushing effective. Before the entry of Plax, brands in the mouth wash market were positioned around two major benefits that are fresh breath and killing germs, whereas Plax was positioned around a new benefit as a plaque fighter and claims Plax removes up to three times more plaque than just brushing alone. In studying the current situation and preparing for a strategic plan, Gwen Hearst reviewed the available information and surveys for the mouthwash market and Scope showed that 75% of Canadian household use 1 or more mouthwash brands. The company’s market research revealed that users could be segmented to “heavy” users that comprised 40% of all users and to “medium” users that comprised 45% of......

Words: 812 - Pages: 4

P&G Case, Scope

...CASE Procter & Gamble, Inc. Scope As Gwen Hearst looked at the year-end report, she was pleased to see that Scope held a 32 percent share of the Canadian mouthwash market for 1990. She had been concerned about the inroads that Plax, a prebrushing rinse, had made in the market. Since its introduction in 1988, Plax had gained a 10 percent share of the product category and posed a threat to Scope. As brand manager, Hearst planned, developed, and directed the total marketing effort for Scope, Procter & Gamble's (P&G) brand in the mouthwash market. She was responsible for maximizing the market share, volume, and profitability of the brand. Until the entry of Plax, brands in the mouthwash market were positioned around two major benefits: fresh breath and killing germs. Plax was positioned around a new benefit-as a "plaque fighter"-and indications were that other brands, such as Listerine, were going to promote this benefit. The challenge for Hearst was to develop a strategy that would ensure the continued profitability of Scope in the face of these competitive threats. Her specific task was to prepare a marketing plan for P&G's mouthwash business for the next three years. It was early February 1991, and she would be presenting the plan to senior management in March. ■ COMPANY BACKGROUND Based on a philosophy of providing products of superior quality and......

Words: 3308 - Pages: 14

Unilever Versus P&G

...goods companies in the world, both P&G and Unilever have been extremely successful in building highly recognized brands that meet consumer needs and drive sustainable value to its shareholders. Currently, P&G operates in two unique segments: Beauty/Grooming and Household Care. It has completely exited the foods segment with the latest divestiture of Pringles. In comparison, Unilever operates in three different segments: Personal Care, Foods, and Homecare. In the past five years, Unilever has re-aligned its foods portfolio (with the divestitures of Lawry’s & Bertolli) while making major acquisitions in the Personal Care space (TIGI & Alberto Culver). For both companies, growth is the name of the game. P&G has committed to growing organics sales 1%-2% faster than the market while Unilever set a goal to double the size of its business in 10 years while reducing its environmental impact. To achieve their ambitions, both companies have articulated their corporate strategy within their annual reports (P&G Shareholder Report 2011, Unilever 2010 Annual Report). Today P&G’s strategy revolves around market development through innovation. Their process starts at identifying a consumer need and developing a product that solves the problem. Once the product and design are finalized, they leverage their complimentary assets such as marketing and distribution to launch. (Anthony, Video) Although a CPG’s value chain is more complicated and involved, P&G is extremely efficient from points......

Words: 1685 - Pages: 7

P&G Scope - Case Analysis

...Gamble, Inc. Scope The problem for Procter & Gamble`s (P&G) “Scope” brand is that their share at mouthwash market is slightly going down while a new brand called “Plax” launched by Pfizer Inc. has gained a %10 market share in a very short time period which created a situation that left “P&G”s management team in dilemma for how to respond. P&G has some constraints to solve the problem (in fact, the situation is so complex that for some, no problem and threat exist). First of all, if they introduce a new product in the mouthwash market as a competitor against Plax; they are not sure if it will be really innovative or it will focus on unmet consumer needs. Another limitation is that introducing a new product to the market will cost a lot (even the test production costs $20,000. Capital costs, marketing costs, delivery costs, inventory costs, ingredients costs, packaging costs are other important costs which create concerns) and also will require an effective strategic management. After that, the new product is very similar to Plax and has no significant advantage except a better taste; on the other hand, sales department thinks that for success, the product must be seen as unique. So, P&G can not be sure about the future success of this product. Next, for the new product to gain reassurance, patience is needed. This can only be achieved in the long period. Following this, the new product will also reduce the sales of Scope. Additionally, P&G is not sure about the......

Words: 646 - Pages: 3