Retribution

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By Ries45
Words 1029
Pages 5
Running head: CORRECTIONAL THEORY PAPER ON RETRIBUTION WITH HISTORY

Discussion of Retribution with History and its Practice

Abstract
Retribution is one of the most important theories in our criminal justice system today. In this essay we will look at the key elements, the history, the future and the modern application of Retribution in our society.

Discussion of Retribution in Corrections
Introduction
The first theory that will be discussed is Retribution. Retribution is a form of punishment that is sometimes mistaken as revenge but is actually a legitimate punishment philosophy because it has three key elements that are; formal penal sanction, equity, and just deserts (Alarid, Pg.24). Retribution is the punishment given to an offender for a crime that is morally right and is fully deserved. The reason retribution really defers from revenge is the three elements above. The formal penal sanction of it is when a law has been broken and action is taken for the good of the public. The next element is equity; this is to make sure that people that commit the same crime get similar punishment and are treated the same. The final element of retribution is just deserts; this is to make sure that the punishment is proportional to the seriousness of the offense and the culpability of the offender. This is what retribution is and now we can look at the history of it. The history of Retribution can reach back a long way in our history. If you look at these words from the Old Testament it says, “An eye for an eye” and “a tooth for a tooth”. This is the basic philosophy of retribution that is in our society today (Clear, Pg.66). This quote from the book shows that at least the very idea of retribution has been around forever. This basic idea was just to make sure that people get punishment similar and equal to whatever their action may have been. Our definition…...

Similar Documents

The Philosophy of Corrections

...The Philosophy of Corrections Israel Nava For CJUS230, B01-DLP Professor Paul Rickert Liberty University September 5, 2008 Introduction The Purpose of Corrections Appropriate purpose of corrections. Rules are set in society to maintain a sense of order and security within the community. When these rules are broken, alternatives must be set in place to handle the offenders. Thus, different forms of “punishment” were developed to deter others from breaking the rules. These philosophies include incapacitation, rehabilitation, deterrence, and retribution. While touching on the subject of the rest, retribution is quite possibly the most effective when it comes to handling societies’ problems. Incapacitation Preventing Crimes Restricting offenders. In the past, corporal punishment involved incapacitating the offender by making it impossible for him or her to commit further offenses of a like nature. For example, the hands of a thief were cut off; the eyes of a spy were gouged; rapists were castrated; prostitutes were disfigured to make them unattractive. According to Reid (2008), another form of incapacitation in earlier days was to brand the offender with a letter symbolizing the crime; thus, an adulteress was branded with the letter A. In modern times, incapacitation has been accomplished primarily through incarceration. [Incarceration] emphasizes maintenance of security and order through the subordination of the prisoner to the authority of the......

Words: 707 - Pages: 3

The Reasons for Death Penalty

...that goes against the law. Reason 3: Death Penalty is a Form of Retribution Genesis 9:6 puts: “[He] Who so sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed.” The very same principle has been espoused by great thinkers and philosophers, from Plato and Thomas Aquinas to Jefferson and Mill. Indeed, retributivist claims that: 1) he who is guilty has to be punished; 2) only he who is guilty deserves punishment, and 3) the degree of punishment is proportional to the degree of crime committed. Thus, Pojman (1) puts that death penalty serves as a reminder that for every unlawful act we make, a proportional consequence awaits, thus, “that dire consequences for immoral actions are eminently appropriate,” (2) making death penalty “a fitting response to evil” (2). Opposition Finkelstein, just like any other abolitionist, sees death penalty as a form of retribution is a rather lame excuse and ill-suited for society. In fact, Fickelstein (12) claims that retributivism does not justify the use of death penalty as a form of punishment, rather, it is absurd since one cannot rape a rapist or rob the homes of burglars. Furthermore anti-death penalties would claim that retribution is not enough to "invoke a system of capital punishment" (deathpenaltycurriculum.org) since executing something to right what is wrong is an insult not on the criminal's side, but to his family. Likewise, Mandery argues that while retribution provides a strong support on punishing a criminal, it does not......

Words: 1876 - Pages: 8

Punishment Research Paper

...to American society there are four types of punishment. These types of punishment are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation and societal protection. Punishment in its concept is favorably perceived as a retributive practice. Our society uses these four forms of punishment attempting to lower crime rates in our society. Some of these types of punishments could be considered harder than others however each one has its own distinction. Retribution according to the dictionary is the act of punishing or taking vengeance for wrongdoing, sin, or injury. I think that the phrase “an eye for an eye” and “a tooth for a tooth” is a very good definition of how retribution depicts peoples need for justice in our American society. When people have gone through an experience of crime or pain, they want some sort of closure or retribution to satisfy their morality. An example of retribution is in our courts system when murders get convicted and sentenced to one life behind bars for every life that was taken. People who believe in retribution believe that there is no rehabilitation or any help to change the criminal just that the criminal must serve the time sentenced. As stated by Gerard V. Bradley (2003) the adoption of retribution as the philosophical basis for punishment therefore provides a powerful, multi-faceted justification for beyond that proffered by the alternatives. Retribution certainly includes elements of deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation, but it......

Words: 1136 - Pages: 5

Retribution Worth the Risk

...Is the Retribution Worth the Risks? Ever since the 1960’s, capital punishment has been a term filled with lots confusion and emotion. Over the years, the penalty has been abolished, then reinstated, and then abolished again in countries all over the world. However, the question remains: Is capital punishment still a fair and logical means of justice? According to Donna Lyons, who wrote an article for the State Legislatures, she claims that “7 out of 10 people are in support of the death penalty” (Lyons). Recently, the process that leads to execution has greatly changed, and it has become quite difficult for a murderer to actually be put to death. Prisoners spend a long while on death row awaiting their fate, but it often occurs that the court system interrupts the process. Many factors can contribute to this. The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution is often the leading cause in a jury’s decision to revoke a death sentence. They argue that capital punishment “violate[s] the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment” (Williams). Many years ago, US states would prohibit the use of the death penalty for this exact reason. They claimed that it is not right to punish a murderer with murder. How does this justify the reason this person is on death row in the first place? Other states would abolish this law because of cost. P.W. Keve, a corrections administrator explains that the “cost of keeping one person in prison is calculated at a current......

Words: 1225 - Pages: 5

Punishment Research Paper

...punishments include retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, and social protection. Although most cases are bargained down from the maximum sentence for the crime,there is still justified punishment in one way or another.Retribution has been around since the beginning of time. It says that the punishmentshould be equal to the severity of the crime. The offender is supposed to suffer as much as thecrime has caused the suffering. It is thought that that the victim is owed something by theoffender to make up for their crime. In today¶s society, a person is punished for their crimethrough serving time in jail, not necessarily paying the victim back. In the Buffalo Criminal LawReview, the author questions the idea of imprisonment as a form of retribution by questioninghow we ³determine the length of time he should be incarcerated by invoking the idea of retribution´ (Rubin, 2004). The idea behind the current system uses different lengths of jail sentences based upon the severity of the crime to punish the criminal. While this can be may be effective form of punishment, but it does not follow the idea of retribution. However, there is one scenario where retribution is used for the victim. In civil lawsuits,the perpetrator must pay the victim back in a monetary form to try to make up for whatever damages where caused. This is a form of retribution to benefit the victim. However, if thecriminal is not able to pay the money back, the victim will not receive in retribution for......

Words: 1125 - Pages: 5

English

...ancient, and Cassio, Othello's fresh appointed lieutenant, accompany fictional character and Desdemona to Cyprus. Iago, angry as a result of fictional character failed to appoint him as general, uses Roderigo, Desdemona's admirer, to realize retribution on Cassio and fictional character. Iago manipulates Roderigo, Cassio, and fictional character by mistreatment their individual weaknesses as a catalyst to their downfall and supreme disgrace. Iago exploits Roderigo's love for Desdemona to injure Cassio. Iago exploits Cassio's weakness for alcohol to squander his name and rank. Iago exploits Othello's weakness for Desdemona and belief within the military system to accumulate retribution. Iago uses Roderigo as a pawn in his plot to disgrace Cassio. Roderigo expresses his weakness to Iago in stating "It is silliness to measure once to measure is torment" (Act1-3)Rderigo's passion for Desdemona blinds his reason, therefore creating him at risk of manipulation. Iago exploits this vulnerability and manipulates Roderigo to believe he can facilitate him attain Desdemona. Iago can "make my fool my purse" and gain wealth attributable to his alleged facilitate of Roderigo. Through this increase in money standing, Iago believes he receives retribution by turning into superior to others. Iago any exploits Roderigo by forcing him to sell his lands and follow Desdemona to Cyprus. Once on Cyprus, Iago uses Roderigo as his pawn. Iago compels Roderigo to electrify and commit to murder Cassio......

Words: 665 - Pages: 3

Ls 490-01 Assignment the Death Penalty Debate: Retribution

...LS 490-01 Assignment The death Penalty Debate: Retribution Follow Below Link to Download Tutorial http://homeworklance.com/downloads/ls-490-01-assignment-death-penalty-debate-retribution/ For More Information Visit Our Website ( http://homeworklance.com/ ) Email us At: Support@homeworklance.com or lancehomework@gmail.com In this assignment, imagine that your state legislature is considering repealing its death penalty and the legislators wish to hear the opinions of the top legal philosophers on both sides of the death penalty debate – imagine yourself as a modern day Jeremy Bentham and present three utilitarian arguments against the death penalty and therefore in favor of its repeal. Then, step into the shoes of a modern day Immanuel Kant and present to the legislature three retributivist arguments in favor of the death penalty and therefore, in opposition to its repeal. For each side of the debate, present each argument in detail, using headings and subheadings to keep your paper well-organized so that it will serve as a useful resource for your state legislators to be able to clearly grasp the key arguments on both sides. Include at least two examples to illustrate the arguments on each side. In addition, the state legislators would like to hear your assessment of which theory of punishment, utilitarian or retributivist, you find most persuasive. Compare the persuasiveness of the two theories and provide a recommendation of which theory the legislators......

Words: 254 - Pages: 2

Chilean Mine Collapse

...Retribution: Should the death penalty be used for retribution? Retribution in the criminal justice system refers to the idea that offenders should be punished for committing crimes when they freely violate existing social rules. Retribution would not support punishing someone who does no exercise free will or was forced to commit a crime, i.e., a gunman compiles a victim to steal money. One example of retribution involves the notion of an eye, which demonstrates that punishment of services crimes is justified when deserved. The team focused on capital punishment in India and whether retribution is utilized in the justice system. Although capital punishment is legal in India, it is rarely carried out. Supporters of the death penalty have argued that the death penalty is morally justified when it is applied in murder especially when there is aggravation, such as multiple homicides, child murder, torture murder and mass killing such as terrorism. The Supreme Court of India ruled in 1983 that the death penalty should be imposed only in “the rarest of rare cases”. The judgment then goes on to say that the “rarest of the rare” must be measured not only in qualitative but also in quantitative term. Basically if the crime fits the punishment than retribution should be utilized and capital punishment would be adhered to. Although it has been stated that capital punishment has been rarely used, history in India reports that between 1975 and 1991, 40......

Words: 626 - Pages: 3

Future Corrections

...today and focus on four major goals; retribution this refers back to the just deserts model meaning that people who break the law deserve to be punished. The three other goals deterrence, incapacitation and those most favored one rehabilitation all of these have their own effective emphasizing methods used to protect the public. The get tough on crime perspective is where the sentencing stage is at currently this has caused an increase in prison populations. As the population and the population of minority groups in the justice system continue to grow it is likely that we will move toward a treatment orientation, and community corrections will be enhanced and expanded. Retribution is one of the first philosophies corrections followed. This model refers back to the just desserts model, basically that people who break the law deserved to be punished. This is based on the idea that society needs to take out its revenge on the offender for violating society’s norms. It is also based on the concept of the law of retaliation, which is similar to the idea of an “eye for an eye”. Because the theory of retribution is just a way for society to take out its revenge and give the offender just desserts it is not adequate enough to stand alone. Retribution would need to be acknowledged that every punishment a fine, probation or prison has some feature of retribution. Because every punishment, fines to prison in some way reflects retribution, retribution will not fit into the ultimate......

Words: 949 - Pages: 4

Future Correctional Problem S

...population are as follows: rehabilitation, retribution, restoration, deterrence, and incapacitation (Johnson, 2005). Rehabilitation For years, researchers have looked upon rehabilitation as the answer to cut down on the number of people who return to prison. Unfortunately, the so-called rehabilitation programs have become ineffective, and caused the recidivism rate to increase. Over the years, society has formed the mentality that nothing works to change criminals and their acts. The reason that most rehabilitation programs do not work are because of poor funding, poor teachers, and poor performance. There are many factors that cause the rehabilitation of prisoners to return to prison. For instance, prisoners seem to return to prison when they are increased monitoring, referrals, and management toward them (Bacik, nd). Retribution Retribution has been linked to increasing correction population because of its mentality toward people who commit crimes. Society believes that when a person commits a crime, he or she should be put into prison. When this happens, there will be an increase in the number of people in the prison system. Retribution is focused primarily on the crime, not the criminal. Society believes that when a person commits a criminal act, that person should be sentenced to the conditions and duration of a prison sentence. Researchers believes that ever retribution is a key factor of......

Words: 652 - Pages: 3

Which Is the Most Appropriate Justification for Punishment – Deterrence, Retribution, Rehabilitation or Incapacitation?

...Which is the most appropriate justification for punishment – deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation or incapacitation? Give reasons for your answer. In this essay the following methods of punishment; deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation and incapacitation will be critically evaluated with example to reference, thus the most appropriate method in collaboration with the justice system for the UK can be selected. There has been much debate with regards to the meaning and purpose let alone the most efficient method of punishment for many years. For the purpose of this essay punishment can be defined as ‘social artefact’ Garland (1990). Punishment such as prison and ASBOs tell us a lot about society such as who has broken the law and who is legit and trustable, nevertheless dose this in reality justify why punishment exists and conducted in a social environment? As stated by Durkheim punishment has a diverse effect on each person certain people react in a positive manner and others in a negative. However he left us to question from all the different strategies at the core of punishment which one actually works in different places or at different times, do societies use different kinds of penal strategy? Why did punishment such as ducking stools and stocks go out of fashion? Why have so many industrial democracies given up on capital punishment? Why has imprisonment become such an important form of punishment” Hudson, J (2003). Capital punishment can be defined......

Words: 2282 - Pages: 10

Competing Theories

...The other competing theories of corrections besides the Classical School, prevalent in today’s prison system are retribution, deterrence, restorative justice, and rehabilitation. According to the Classical School theory, the punishment should fit the crime equally. Meaning, that the punishment a person is given should equally fit the seriousness of the crime committed, and not be more extreme such as hanging or burning someone. Someone who steals should not be burned at the stake, because the punishment does not fit the seriousness of the crime. The need for punishment is still there, but it is just applied more rationally. The theory of retribution is the earliest known rationale used for punishment. For a long time, “retribution was solely a matter of inflicting suffering in return for wickedness” (Bradley, 2003, pg.6). Retribution is a call for punishment fueled by inner anger and a perceived need for vengeance. The theory of retribution follows the “just desserts” model of criminal sentencing, that believes when someone has been convicted and punished for a crime, they have received their “just desserts”. It is akin to a form of revenge taken by society as a whole against the perpetrator. “Retribution sees punishment as deserved, justified, and even required by the offender’s behavior” (Schmalleger, 2012). Punishment in the form of retribution helps to dissuade the victim or the victim’s family from pursuing their own brand of justice. The fact that......

Words: 1428 - Pages: 6

English

...(Schmalleger pg 371). The five philosophical reasons for sentencing criminals are retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation, and restoration. The six forms of punishments are fines, community service, probation, imprisonment, parole, and capital punishment. The relationship between sentencing and punishment in today’s courts in my opinion are carried out efficiently and effectively. The five philosophical reasons for sentencing criminals are retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation, and restoration. Retribution is a form of taking revenge on a criminal. Retribution in the early days was an eye or an eye situation where now it can be perceived as the implementation of justice in the criminal justice system. Incapacitation, is imprisoning a criminal to reduce the odds that the criminal will commit more crimes in the future. Deterrence is the attempt to inhibit criminal activity by using the fear of punishment. Rehabilitation is the attempt to reform a criminal offender through education and psychological treatment to reduce the likelihood of future criminal activity (Schmalleger pg 375). Restoration is an attempt to make the victim whole again which in my opinion I would describe as making the victim feel secure that their perpetrator is now somewhere where they cannot commit another crime. Therefore, the five philosophical reasons for sentencing criminals are retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation, and restoration. The six......

Words: 841 - Pages: 4

Criminal Sentencing

...Sentencing CRJ 301 Juvenile Justice Timothy Koester September 20, 2010 Criminal Sentencing Over the years, there has been great debate over the purpose of sentencing criminals, but it generally all boils down to the importance of deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution. All four plays an important role in sentencing, and each vary on a case-by-case basis. As far as the purpose of criminal sentencing goes, it is imperative that all courts are on the same page and strive to achieve the same outcome. Due to the ever-changing society we live in, there has always been controversy as to what the right objective was for the criminal when it comes to punishment. For long time rehabilitation was the focus in criminal sentencing, but that proved to fail due to the increase of recidivism. Now it seems that the main focus of criminal sentencing is incapacitation, which hopefully leads to deterrence, rehabilitation, or retribution. It is clear that information on the outcomes of sentences and their cost must play a crucial role in deciding the relative importance of deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution (Justice). When the criminal court system focuses on incapacitation for the offender, it does so for many reasons. There are many that feel future crime can be prevented if the criminal is locked up and physically restrained. One aspect of this is the approach to lock them up and throw away the key.......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Correctional Theory

...and correction is made up of a combination of strenuous, criticizing, and practical theories. Retribution The most common traditional rationale for correction and punishment in the U.S. is retribution (Seter, 2011). What is retribution? What does retribution have to do with the criminal justice system and the correctional theories that are prevalent in the system? Retribution is the dispensing or receiving of reward or punishment especially in the hereafter. (Merriam-Webster) Basically, retribution is a punishment given to someone that is deserved because of the crime they have committed. Retribution is seen as the reason behind sentencing. People go by the saying “An eye for an eye” meaning vengeance for a crime. Mahatma Gandhi, a man of peace, once said “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” If everyone gets even, after a while there won't be any one left. Think about it, if we all take an eye or two for every eye we lose pretty soon no one will be able to see at all. Utilitarianism Sentencing is a combination of retribution and utilitarian principles of correction. The purpose of corrections is to attain justice for the victim and to rehabilitate a convicted offender. Utilitarianism is a doctrine that the useful is the good and......

Words: 1374 - Pages: 6