Search Warrants

In: Other Topics

Submitted By Dale017
Words 1621
Pages 7
Search Warrants & Probable Cause
Dale Langston
American Intercontinental University

Abstract
This paper examines the many factors of search warrants it will examine the process by which a search warrant may be applied for and issued, focusing on the requirements of the Fourth Amendment. This paper will also describe probable cause and the standard by which the cause is fulfilled. In addition, it will describe and discuss at least two forms of searches that do not need a warrant. Also discussed in the study is warrant less searches, if the reasons are compelling, and if all requests require probable cause exists or exceptions.

Search Warrants & Probable Cause
Search warrants are issued when there is probable cause and it needs one. If a police officer was to walk into your household and search it without consent or a search warrant, they not only get into trouble, but what they might find could be thrown out at the hearing and does not count against you. Occasionally there are even searches that will not involve a search warrant which means whatever they do discovery can become trouble for you as well as can be used alongside you in court.
Under the Fourth Amendment, to law enforcement or anyone else in this field, individuals need be safe in their households and in their individuals against arbitrary searches and seizures (Schmalleger, 2012). Fourth Amendment states: "The right of the people to have protection of their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things be arrested “(Schmalleger, 2012). Fourth amendment come to be active December 15, 1791 by Congress.
A search warrant authorizes police to search for evidence of…...

Similar Documents

Search and Seizure

...Search and seizure is when a law enforcement/gov. agent looks for evidence in a manner that intrudes into a persons legally protected zone of Privacy. These agents then take possession or control of the property or persons. ( Scheb, 2012) The 4th Amendment puts legal limitations on search and seizure and protects against unlawful search and seizure. The 4th Amendment states: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The 4th Amendment requires law enforcement officers to get a warrant before conducting search and seizures. In order for the officer to get such warrant he/she must have probable cause. This means that the officer must believe that the search will produce evidence of a crime. (Scheb, 2012) There are a few different types of consent when it comes to search and seizure. Consent to search is when a suspect/ person voluntary allows an officer of the law to search his/her car, home, bag, or whatever it may be. Then there is implied consent, which is when and officer is called to a specific location where a crime has been committed. This is a given that the officer is going to search the area where the crime has been committed. Third Party Consent has in the past and...

Words: 454 - Pages: 2

Convertible Warrant

...A convertible warrant is an option that allows the buyer to partially or fully convert the alloted warrants into an equivalent number of equity shares of the company within a specified time period. Preferential allotment of convertible warrants is a private placement of warrants to a select group of persons who may or may not belong to the promoter group. SEBI has come up with certain guidelines for preferential allotment of warrants. These guidlines have to be strictly followed by any company which goes for preferential allotment. Need for convertible warrants ----------------------------- i)From the company's perspective : Every company requires cash for its operation, expansion plans and M&A. When a company needs a large amount of money in a short duration, private placement of warrants is a good option. ii)From the Warrant Buyer's perspective : Convertible warrants allow the buyer to earn a fixed rate of return without the risk of capital loss due to a fall in the stock price of the company. The buyer can also earn profits by exercising the option to convert the warrants to equity shares if the stock price of the company appreciates. What it means to the shareholders of the company ------------------------------------------------ Advantages : It is a good sign if promoters go for convertible warrants at a price higher than the market price. It reassures the shareholders that the promoters have faith in the company. Also, the company can grow at a faster...

Words: 663 - Pages: 3

Warrant Paper

...A. Assuming Officer Jones only had the information set forth in paragraphs #1 through #4 would he have probable cause for a search warrant? Why or why not? Paragraph #1 through #4 do not provide enough probable cause for a warrant. Paragraph #1 through #4 provide information from the anonymous tip and from the informant. The only other information provided is the background of Officer A. Jones as a law enforcement officer. When reviewing Illinois Vs Gates, and the “Totality of the Circumstances Test”. In order to complete this Test, first you would need to have the information from your tip and from the informant which you have. Second the officer must have knowledge himself or through another government entity in order to complete this Test (Invispress P2). Paragraph #1 through #4 give very good information from the informant and the tip line. What is lacking is any actual drugs gained by the informant to turn over to Officer Jones. In addition Officer Jones is unable to corroborate the information from both sources. Until he develops the knowledge himself or through another government source, the second prong to the Test is missing (Invispress P2). B. Assuming the warrant was signed by the judge and it was later determined that the probable cause was lacking, would the evidence that was seized be suppressed by the court? Why or why not? Under the Exclusionary Rule the evidence would be suppressed. The Exclusionary Rule prevents the prosecution from using evidence...

Words: 584 - Pages: 3

Search and Seizure

...Search and Seizure Louisa Barnes CJ333: Constitutional Law March 16, 2014 Erin Shriver SEARCH AND SEIZURE Constitutional Search The high school students were throwing a party that created so much noise that a noise complaint was lodged with the police by a neighbor. This gave the police the right to enter onto the property to investigate the complaint. Once they arrived at the residence and started talking to the party goers they smelled marijuana on the individuals. Because of the reasonable suspicion and probable cause that criminal activity was taking place they had a right to search the premises. This is found in the Fourth Amendment under Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion (Farlex, Inc., 2014).To protect evidence from being destroyed they also had a need for the search of the premises. To protect themselves as well as possible evidence they were also permitted to frisk the individuals that were out on the porch of the house. This exercise is permitted when they have reasonable suspicion that a criminal activity is taking place (Daniel E. Hall, 2012, pp. 509-510). While frisking the individuals a bag of marijuana was found. This led the police officers to then call for backup for searching the house before evidence inside the property could be destroyed before a warrant could be obtained. While waiting on the backup they proceeded to search the remaining individuals inside the home, again to keep themselves safe. Drugs are a type of evidence that can......

Words: 1268 - Pages: 6

Search and Seizure Warrant Affidavit

...distribution of marijuana from a particular residence, where a Mr. James Fox resides. I have reason to believe illegal activity is taking place in said residence from an anonymous tip I received claiming to have knowledge of the illegal substances being grown inside and sold from the house. I enlisted an informant whom was referred to me by a prosecutor because the informant is trying to reduce a possible drug distribution sentence. Assuming I only had particular knowledge of certain facts, would I have probable cause to request a search warrant for the resident? If said search warrant had been signed by a judge and it was later discovered that there was a lack of probable cause, would the evidence seized be suppressed by the court? Are there any issues regarding the credibility of this informant? If so, what are the issues? Assuming now that I have obtained more information, such as Mr. Fox’s electric bills, would I now have enough probable cause for a search warrant? Why or why not? Keywords: probable cause, plain view doctrine, constructive possession, exclusionary rule, good faith exception, competency, credibility. I, Officer Steve Jones, am currently investigating a case involving the growth and distribution of at least 400 marijuana plants at the residence of 120 Verlinden Drive. Mr. James Fox resides here, and is the prime suspect. On 18 September, I received an anonymous tip about the drug activity taking place at this particular residence. After......

Words: 2027 - Pages: 9

Search Warent

...PROJECT ONE: Search Warrant Draft Use the following fact pattern from which you will draft a search warrant. The scenario will include at least one issue involving the source of the information, one issue involving items to be seized, and other issues I deem appropriate. 1. On 18 Sept 09, Officer Steve Jones received an anonymous tip that Mr. James Fox lived in a house at 120 Verlinden Drive and is growing marijuana in the basement at least 400 plants. 2. Officer Jones, a drug investigator with 15 years experience enlisted an informant to check out the house and try to buy some marijuana. The informant has no track record working for the police but the prosecutor referred him to Jones because the informant wanted to help reduce a possible drug distribution sentence. 3. The informant came back a few days later and told Jones that on 19 September he saw Fox and another man carry a carbon dioxide tank and other equipment into the house and drag two laundry bags to a Chevy (a 1990 Malibu) parked on the street in front of the house. (Officer Jones later runs the tag and the car is registered to James Fox). The informant tried to buy marijuana that evening and as soon as he entered the house the informant could smell the odor of marijuana. Fox bragged he had an unlimited supply of marijuana so he could do business with the informant, but begged off selling any marijuana that evening. Fox excused himself and went to the basement door. When the door was open the informant......

Words: 1144 - Pages: 5

Warrant Draft

...----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR CHESAPEAKE COUNTY, MD APPLICATION AND AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH AND SEIZURE WARRANT I, Officer Steve Jones, of the Metropolis Police Department, the Affiant, being duly sworn, request the issuance of a Search and Seizure Warrant and states as follows: 1. APPLICATION AND VIOLATIONS OF LAW: The Affiant hereby makes application to Judge Barry Moredock, a judge of the Circuit/District Court for Chesapeake County, MD for a Search and Seizure Warrant on the grounds that there is probable cause, the basis of which is set forth in the following affidavit which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, to believe that there is property subject to seizure under the laws of this State and more particularly in violation of the Criminal Law Article, specifically, the crimes of: MD. CODE ANN. §5-607(a) In possession of more than 50 lbs. of marijuana with intent to distribute. 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PLACE, PERSON, OR MOTOR VEHICLE TO BE SEARCHED: This Application and Affidavit are made to obtain authority to search the premises described below: The residence to be searched is one single family home located at 120 Verlinden Drive Chesapeake County, Maryland and one 1990 Chevrolet Malibu Registered to James Fox. 3. AFFIANT’S TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE: 40 hours of instruction on identification, detection and manufacturing of controlled dangerous substances. Presently......

Words: 1777 - Pages: 8

Search and Seizure

...Search and Seizure When it comes to Search and Seizure, allot of people think that law enforcement should not be allowed to search or seize property. I have heard many arguments against this subject, people stating that law enforcement officers go too far or have no right to search someone’s property such as their vehicle. Probable cause is more than a reasonable suspicion it requires that a combination of facts makes it more likely than not that items sought are where police believe them to be. In addition to establishing probable cause for a search, a warrant must contain the reasons for obtaining it, the names of people presenting the affidavits, what is specifically being sought and the signature of the judge issuing it. Search and seizure is the process used by law enforcement officers, who suspect that a crime is being or has been committed. Law enforcement officers search a person’s property and confiscate any evidence related to the crime. In situations where it would be unreasonable for a person to expect privacy, there is no search to justify, so no warrant is needed. Law enforcement officers make may kinds if searches, from crime scenes, suspects, dead bodies, vehicles, hotel rooms, apartments, homes and offices. Searching is a very important task in most criminal investigations because of the evidence that can be obtained. Probable cause is more than a reasonable suspicion it requires that a combination of facts makes it more than likely than not that......

Words: 1209 - Pages: 5

Search

...LEGAL MEMORANDUM 02-264 TO: ALL JUSTICES OF THE PEACE FROM: PATRICIA W. GRIFFIN CHIEF MAGISTRATE RE: NIGHTTIME SEARCH WARRANTS DATE: APRIL 30, 2002 ________________________________________________________________________ The subject of nighttime search warrants was discussed by Chief Magistrate Barron in some detail in Legal Memorandum 80-5, “Search Warrants; A Review” (July 10, 1980) at 7-9; Legal Memorandum 80-5 (4th Supplement) (December 1, 1987). However, since that time, there has been a considerable amount of caselaw concerning such warrants, so that this is an appropriate time to review the current law regarding the issuance of nighttime search warrants. What is a nighttime search warrant? A nighttime search warrant is a warrant that expressly authorizes a search of a residence during the nighttime. To issue such a warrant the judge should not only find the normal probable cause to issue a search warrant, the judge should also be satisfied that there is probable cause to believe that the issuance of the warrant for the nighttime is necessary in order to prevent the escape or removal of the person or thing to be searched for. The requirement for a special nighttime search warrant is contained in 11 Del.C. § 2308 that states: A search warrant shall not authorize the person executing it to search any dwelling house in the nighttime unless the judge, justice of the peace or magistrate is satisfied that it is necessary in order to......

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

Arrest Warrant

...AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT AND ARREST WARRANT FOR Mr. B I, Officer Lee, Detective, Robbery/Homicide , Baltimore City Police Department, being duly sworn, do depose and state: 1. I have been employed as a Detective with the Baltimore City Police Department since July 2000 and am presently assigned to Robbery/Homicide Administration, Baltimore Circuit Court. I am a law enforcement Officer, who is empowered to conduct investigations of crimes that involve robbery, and make arrests for, robbery offenses Title 18, United States Code §2516. I have successfully completed a sixteen (16) week Robbery Detective training at the Robbery Training Academy at the DEA Academy in Quantico, Virginia. This training included instruction in the investigation of crimes involving robber , including robberies that result in a homicide. 2. The facts set forth in this Affidavit are known to me as a result of my investigation and interview with Mr. A These are not all the facts known to me throughout the course of this investigation, but rather only those which are essential to establish probable cause for charging a complaint against Mr. B for the federal violation listed here. PROBABLE CAUSE 5. A witness to the crime, later identified as Mr. A, walked into the Baltimore Police Department, producing three watches that were later identified as items that were reported stolen, and advised that the person who committed the robbery was Mr. B. 6. Investigation revealed that the......

Words: 311 - Pages: 2

Search & Seizure

...Search & Seizure A police officer is dispatched to a call in his jurisdiction for a noise complaint. The police officer arrives hearing very loud music coming from the residence which violates a noise ordinance. The police officer knocks on the front door with no answer so he proceeds to the back door to knock when he observes what appears to be marijuana plants based on his training and experience. The police officer can seize the marijuana plants based on the Plain View Doctrine. “In Harris v. United States (1968), the Supreme Court ruled that anything a police officer sees in plain view, when the officer has a right to be where he or she is, is not the product of a search and is therefore admissible as evidence.” [1] The police officer is legally in a place in which he should be because of the noise complaint call. The police officer recognized the marijuana plants as contraband and has the right to seize them without a search warrant. “How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, has an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying.”[2] The police officer needs to obtain a search warrant in order to search the rest of the residence. With no exception present, the police officer would be violating the resident’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure if he conducted a full search of the residence without a search warrant. “The Fourth Amendment is as......

Words: 696 - Pages: 3

Search and Seizures

...Checkpoint Search and Seizure Searches and seizures in cyberspace When talking about the nature pertaining to cyberspace this has caused the fourth Amendment rights pertaining to illegal or unreasonable searches and seizures to be reviewed numerous times against new technology. In cases of illegal activity on a computer a special tasks force was designed in order to scan information sent to and from networks. The special tasks forces are able to intercept information that contains illegal activity. When illegal activity is detected then an IP address from the computer is recorded along with the information, time of transferred files and location of the computer(s) that information was sent off of. This is what happened in the case of John Wellman. Mr. Wellman was accused of possessing electronic images of child pornography. In cases such as this it can be argued by the accused that investigators do not have probable cause to obtain a search warrant. In cases involving cyberspace if information is found to be illegal activity then it can be a search and a seizure of and for such property and the individual. Searches by off duty officers Searches that are conduct when the officer is off duty is considered a government search in most cases. Many departments and jurisdictions consider the officer as part of Law Enforcement there for they are on duty twenty-four seven. If this was not a consideration and accepted throughout departments and jurisdictions as a......

Words: 591 - Pages: 3

Search and Warrants

...Search and Warrants To discuss the stipulations of search and warrants, one will look at the past to see the beginning of those procedures. The Fourth Amendment is the bases for the search and seizure for it states simply this, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search and seizure… And no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly the place it be searched, and persons or things to be seized.” (Constitution of the United States of America) (Whitebread & slobogin, 2008) When looking back we see that the Amendments are set in place to protect the people and give them certain rights to. The Amendments are or are not followed by the letter, yet in some instances they also can cause conflict of for example we can look at the different insistences in history that this procedure has been altered because of the laws itself. “In the case of Boyd v. United States in 1886; the court contented that the papers obtained through a subpoena should be excluded because it would cause the witness to be witness against himself...meaning of the Fifth Amendment.” (Whitebread & slobogin, 2008) This is totally ridiculous because our fore fathers should have reread the Constitution to make sure that one Constitution law did not interfere with the other Constitution laws. How can law enforcers be effective and sure when they have to constantly be on guard......

Words: 1177 - Pages: 5

Do Police Need a Warrant to Search Property

...Jennifer Springer BUSN201 Business Law - Final Paper Do Police Need a Warrant to Search Property On February 15, 2014 the Supreme Court ruled it would honor the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement when one cotenant refuses a warrantless search prior to being arrested, and then police receiving consent by the other cotenant to search the property. If a person’s health and safety are threatened by a domestic abuser, exigent circumstances would justify immediate removal of the abuser from the premises. Domestic abuse is indeed a serious problem in the United States, appropriate policy responses to this scourge may include fostering effective counseling, providing public information about, and ready access to, protective orders, and enforcing such orders diligently. Although in some cases a warrantless search would be unconstitutional, Police would need to know the difference when a warrant is required. I believe that a warrantless search by police is constitutional and meets the reasonableness of the IV Amendment, as long as one present cotenant gives consent and there is probable cause. A warrantless search can help minimize criminal activity. As well as help those in domestic disputes and or child abuse situations. There have been many cases that have involved warrantless search cases over the years. Starting with Amos v. United States (1921), Amos was indictment for six counts. Not guilty on the first four counts, but guilty on the fifth, charging him with......

Words: 1648 - Pages: 7

Analyze Search Warrant

...Week 2 Project 1: Analyze a Search Warrant Review the affidavit and search warrant for the search of a computer suspected to be evidence in a crime (provided by your instructor), and answer the following questions: 1. What is the affidavit asking the judge to authorize (specifically)? The affidavit is asking the judge to authorize the search of Mr. Yup I. Didit’s Dell Precision T3500 desktop computer, black in color, serial number 5V678QR, containing Electronic Media Storage (e.g., hard drive(s)) and four (4) Memorex recordable compact discs currently located at the Kansas State Highway Patrol Evidence Room, 122 SW 7th, Topeka, KS 66603. 2. What was good about this affidavit? What, if anything, could have been done to strengthen this affidavit? The affidavit itself is very specific about what is to be searched – the computer and the additional four CDs. As well as what information they are looking for. To make this affidavit stronger they should have included going to the residence of Mr. Didit’s to look for additional storage media that could contain evidence of the crime. 3. If you are the forensic examiner in this case, and this warrant was given to you with Mr. Didit's seized desktop and removable media, what do you have the authority to search? For what do you have the authority to search? You have the authority to search the entire desktop and removable media. You are looking for any data or information (including but not limited to files, folders,......

Words: 575 - Pages: 3