Sox and Pcaob Discussion

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Candessa
Words 547
Pages 3
The Sarbanes-Oxley act was created in 2002, requiring companies to have more sufficient internal control over their financial statements. The old “I wasn’t aware of that” from executives is no longer acceptable and in fact can result in jail time for the executives and others involved. The company can also lose their exchange listing, lose of D&O insurance or face large 7+ figure fines. The act was a direct response to corporate scandals, such as WorldCom, Enron and Tyco who covered up or misrepresented questionable transactions. The scandals resulted in large losses including the closure of Enron and Arthur Anderson. This act applies to all US public companies as well as international companies that have “registered equity or debt securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the accounting firms that provide auditing services to them”. (Sarbanes-Oxley Essential Information)

While the intention was good, I do not feel the benefits out way the costs, particularly for smaller public companies. In an article in The CPA Journal, it lists out some of the expected costs based on a survey completed by PricewaterhouseCoopers in June 2003. The article states the direct costs associated with this act are the accounting and auditing fees. The survey estimated $2 million in first-year compliance, 12,000 hours of internal work, 3,000 hours of external work and additional audit fees of $590,000. (D'Aquila) While large companies may be able to afford these types of costs, there are smaller companies that are required to have the same standards and they do not have the money to meet these requirements. And granted, these are first year costs; there will still be costs each year associated with the external audits that are required to be performed in order to ensure compliance. Additionally there companies, and I worked for one that did not have an…...

Similar Documents

Pcaob How Effective

...PCAOB: How Effective is this Board? Enforcement Trends The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, otherwise known as the PCAOB, was created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This board is created to make sure that all CPA firms are in compliance with the standards that have been set by SOX. The PCAOB has developed throughout the years and their primary focus is on high-risk clients and detecting fraud. When the board decides to investigate a firm, they have two types of investigations to choose from: informal and formal investigations. Generally an informal investigation starts when there is a complaint alleging or indicating that there is a violation taking place. If there is enough information and evidence obtained, then this leads to the formal investigation. After the investigation, the PCAOB has to determine whether a disciplinary proceeding will be warranted. This results when there is a violation of any rule of the board, any provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the provisions of the securities laws, or any professional standard. It is being noticed that the PCAOB has a very positive effect in the financial world since being established after huge fiscal scandals. It has been found that the PCAOB inspection process causes an improvement in the quality of audits along with significant reduction in abnormal accruals. This board has a strong enforcement process when dealing with violations. It is also safe to say that the PCAOB is an effective part of proper......

Words: 500 - Pages: 2

Sox Act

...Oversight Board (PCAOB) Independent Audit Firm Audit Committee of the Corporate Board of Directors Internal Audit Function Internal Control System Corporate Governance & Financial Reporting U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC ) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Independent Audit Firm Corporate Board Of Directors Audit Committee CEO & CFO Internal Audit Function Internal Control System The U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)     The mission of the SEC is to protect investors, maintain orderly and efficient financial markets, and facilitate capital formation. The laws and rules governing the securities industry derive from a straightforward concept: all investors, large or small, should have access to certain basic facts about an investment prior to buying it, and so long as they hold it. Therefore the SEC requires public companies to disclose meaningful financial and other information to the public. This provides a common pool of knowledge for all investors to judge for themselves whether to buy, sell, or hold a particular security. For more visit: http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)  The PCAOB is a private, nonprofit corporation created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, under the oversight of the SEC, to supervise the auditors of public companies. The PCAOB was created to protect investors and the public interest.  The PCAOB Board......

Words: 1076 - Pages: 5

The Role and Function of Pcaob and as 5

...and function of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and Auditing Standard 5 (AS 5). Due to the increased demand for oversight in auditing standards, this paper also examines the impact of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) and the reasons for the creation of the PCAOB, as well as the implementation of the rules and regulations. Additionally, this paper examines the impact of AS 5. Keywords: audit, AS 5, financial statements, PCAOB, SEC, SOX Table of Contents Introduction ………….……………………………………………………..……………………4 Scandals ...…..……………………………………...……………………………………………4 PCAOB Mission and Vision …………………… ……………………………………………….5 Structure ………………………….……………..……………………………………………5, 6 PCAOB's Objective….…….……..…………………………………………………………….6, 7 Duties ………………………….…..………………………………………………….……… 7, 8 Standard Setting………..………………………………………………………………..……..…8 Inspection ………………………………………………………………………………………..8 Enforcement…………..………………………………………………………………..……...8, 9 AS5 .…………………….…………………………………………………...…………….…9, 10 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….....……. 10 References …………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 History of PCAOB …………………………………………………………………… 13-19 Introduction Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) was passed in 2002 and as a result brought numerous changes to auditing. The Sarbanes-Oxley was passed in direct response to business failures, allegations of corporate improprieties and financial statement restatements. Prior to the SOX passage, auditors used a risk-based approach to perform audits......

Words: 4474 - Pages: 18

Adoption of Sox

...University BUS 309 Ethics June 12, 2011 1. Analyze the new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public company boards, management, and public accounting firms that the SOX required. The Sarbanes Oxley Act, commonly known as SOX, came into existence in 2002, named after Senator Paul Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley, in response to the ever increasing instances of financial scandals plaguing publically traded United States-based companies. The purpose of the Act is to “protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws." (SOX-Online.com). Specifically, the act requires a heightened level of accountability from Chief Executive Officers, Chief Financial Officers, the implementation of a Board of Directors, stricter fines and jail time for violations or fraud, closely monitored disclosure of financial documents and data, and the need for independent external auditing. 2. Examine why the new enhanced standards are necessary. The basic concept of why the new enhanced standards are necessary is to hold companies and their executives accountable for their actions and the data they present to investors and securities agencies. The Act specifically addresses 11 areas for control, which are Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB); Auditor Independence; Corporate Responsibility; Enhanced Financial Disclosures; Analyst Conflicts of Interest; Commission Resources and Authority;......

Words: 965 - Pages: 4

Sox and Its Effects on It Security Governance

...International Journal of Smart Home Vol. 3, No. 1, January, 2009 SOX and its effects on IT Security Governance Rosslin John Robles1, Min-kyu Choi1, Sung-Eon Cho2, Yang-seon Lee2, Tai-hoon Kim 1 School of Multimedia, Hannam University, Daejeon, Korea 2 Dept of Information Communication, Sunchon Univerity, Sunchon, Korea 3 Fumate Inc., Daejeon, Korea rosslin_john@yahoo.com, secho@sunchon.ac.kr, yslee@fumate.com, taihoonn@empal.com Abstract The Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act is a United States federal law enacted on July 30, 2002 in response to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals including those affecting Enron, Tyco International, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems and WorldCom. This paper discusses the effects of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act on corporate information security governance practices. The resultant regulatory intervention forces a company to revisit its internal control structures and asses the nature and scope of its compliance with the law. This paper reviews the implications emerging from the mandatory compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act. Issues related to IT governance and the general integrity of the enterprise are also identified and discussed. Industry internal control assessment frameworks, such as COSO and COBIT, are reviewed and their usefulness in ensuring compliance evaluated. 1. Introduction Accounting scandals at some of the big corporations like Enron, HealthSouth, Tyco and WorldCom had a devastating impact on investor confidence.......

Words: 3348 - Pages: 14

Sox of 2002

...Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 Topics Covered: How SOX affects the following: CEO’s and CFO’s of Public Companies Outside Independent Audit Firms SOX section 404 on Internal Control The Main Advantages and Disadvantages of SOX Executive Summary The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was intended to create more transparency in financial reporting and to combat the perceived inflation of CEO compensation. To do this, the act required that a board of directors be financially independent from the CEO and have no familial ties. It also required the CEO and CFO to personally sign all quarterly and annual reports submitted to the SEC and provided for criminal penalties if this was not done. Our research indicates that Sarbanes-Oxley has created more transparency in the system, but it has actually had the opposite effect than was intended with regards to CEO compensation. The research indicates that CEO compensation has increased for many companies post-Sarbanes-Oxley. Due in large part to the Enron scandal, SOX needed to address outside independent audit firms to improve the accuracy of financial reports disclosed by publicly traded companies. These financial reports are used by investors, bankers and interested consumers to determine how well an organization is doing and provide investors with vital information about a company’s performance. This paper will discuss the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and how the SOX law affects outside independent audit firms. Next we......

Words: 4177 - Pages: 17

Pcaob

...On December 4, 2013, the PCAOB re-proposed amendments to its standards that would improve the transparency of public company audits. The amendment is made up of two parts which includes disclosing names, locations, and the extent to which other independent accounting firms took part in the audit, as well as disclosing the name of the engagement partner in the auditor's report. Though both issues have definitely caused a stir in the accounting profession, disclosing the name of the engagement partner has sparked many more debates among professionals. While the PCAOB believes that this requirement will be of great help to improve the transparency, there are many others who believe that the disclosure is just “a solution in search of a problem”. (Frenzel, 2014) A benefit that this proposed amendment will bring to the profession is that it has the potential to make auditors more accountable. The audit partner will feel more responsible for the work that is being performed, as his/her name will be attached to the report. In response, this increased feeling of responsibility will encourage better performance on their part, which will cascade down to the entire engagement team. This means that auditors will be more thorough, decreasing the chances of discrepancies, and therefore improving the quality of audits. Additionally, disclosing the name of the engagement partner would provide investors with more information, which would benefit both them and the public. Including the......

Words: 757 - Pages: 4

Pcaob

...PCAOB Proposes a New Auditing Standard to Enhance the Auditor... http://pcaobus.org/News/Releases/Pages/08132013_OpenMeeting.aspx Stay Connected: PCAOB Proposes a New Auditing Standard to Enhance the Auditor's Reporting Model Also Proposes a New Related Auditing Standard on the Auditor’s Responsibilities for Other Information in an Annual Report Washington, DC, Aug. 13, 2013 The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board today proposed for public comment a new auditing standard and related amendments to enhance the auditor's reporting model. The proposed standard would retain the pass/fail model in the existing auditor's report, but would provide additional information to investors and other financial statement users about the audit and the auditor. "These proposed changes will make the auditor's report more relevant to investors," said James R. Doty, PCAOB Chairman. "More robust audit reports that demonstrate the strength and value of the audit also should lead to better public awareness of, and appreciation for, auditors' skill and insight." In 2010 and 2011, PCAOB staff conducted outreach to investors, auditors, preparers of financial statements, audit committee members, and other interested parties to seek their views on potential changes to the auditor's report. The staff presented its findings to the Board at an open meeting in March 2011. In June 2011, the Board issued a Concept Release to seek public comment on potential changes to the auditor's reporting......

Words: 654 - Pages: 3

Changes to Sox

...Possible Changes to SOX Although SOX has improved firms’ financial reporting, additional modifications could make SOX more effective. Adjustments could be made that will encourage better composition and performance of corporate boards, improve safeguards for whistleblowers, and enhance management accountability as well as the function of the PCAOB. Although SOX put in significant provisions to improve corporate governance, which included the establishment of audit committees that had independent directors, there is room for improvement. One potential measure is to set term limits for directors, which would ensure that fresh eyes are reviewing business practices . Another measure is to limit the number of public company boards an individual could serve on, which would ensure that board members are not focusing on too many different companies. It is possible that these recommendations will constitute regulatory overreach. At minimum there could be measures that require continuing education for board members so that they remain current in their knowledge of best corporate practices. Another weakness of the bill is that it does not provide protection for auditors who want to report fraud but worry about potential retaliation. Legislation could be created, requiring that no auditors can be fired unless a super majority of the shareholders approves it or the SEC allows it (Livingstone, 2003). In addition, the law already requires that a confidential reporting system is......

Words: 485 - Pages: 2

Pcaob

...information outside the financial statements. These alternatives include: * An auditor's discussion and analysis; * Required and expanded use of emphasis paragraphs; * Auditor assurance on other information outside the financial statements; and, * Clarification of language in the standard auditor's report. Partner’s Information Disclosed * the Board did not include in this proposal a requirement to sign the engagement partner's name on the audit report. Instead, the proposal would require that the engagement partner's name be disclosed in the audit report, which would make the engagement partner's name readily available to the users of the audit report while mitigating concerns about minimizing the firm's role in the audit. * The proposed disclosure would enable investors to evaluate the other participants in the audit in the same manner that they evaluate the auditor. For example, knowing the name of a disclosed accounting firm that took part in the audit would enable investors to determine whether the firm is registered with the Board and has been subject to PCAOB inspection, or is located in a country that does not allow PCAOB inspections. Investors would also be able to verify whether a disclosed firm or person has had any publicly available disciplinary history with the PCAOB or other regulators. International Cooperative Agreements * The SOX directed the PCAOB to oversee and periodically inspect all accounting firms that regularly audit......

Words: 727 - Pages: 3

Sox Discussion

...Auditing Principles and Procedures ACC2366 Section311 SOX Discussion Question: Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act states that senior management must certify the accuracy of the financial statements produced by that accounting firm.  How will this section of the act affect senior management’s cautiousness before signing off on the financial statements?  Do you think this mandate will encourage more ethical people in senior management roles? Why?  Which major corporation that we’ve studied recently had issues with management signing off on their financial statements?  Why did they refuse to sign off on them? Under section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act signing officers are responsible for various duties to ensure the final statements are fairly represented and not misleading to its users. Before management signs off on financial statements they have to be reviewed. They also have to ensure internal controls in place have been evaluated and effective within 90 days prior to the report being issued. According to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, “the signing officers have designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the issuer and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to such officers by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being prepared” (Sarbanes Oxley Act, 2012, s302). The act requires management to disclose these controls in their financial statements. Officers must also disclose...

Words: 462 - Pages: 2

Sox Regulations

...The Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on Accounting and Finance Departments Danika Grace Brown Lakeland College Kellett School of Business – BlendEd BA 772 Advanced Industrial Accounting II Instructor Mary Diederich March 10, 2015 Table of Contents Abstract 2 Overview of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 3 About SOX 4 Reporting and Compliance 5 Risk Assessment and Control 6 Interview at Company X 7 Standards for Corporations and Officers 8 Auditing and Financial Reporting 9 Future Impact of SOX 10 Conclusion 11 References 13 Abstract Sarbanes-Oxley is the response from Congress in regards to the financial industry collapse that happened over a decade ago. Due to unethical reporting from corporations, Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) is a United States federal law that set new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public company boards, management and public accounting firms. As a result of SOX, top management must individually certify the accuracy of financial information. In addition, penalties for fraudulent financial activity are much more severe. Furthermore, SOX increased the oversight role of boards of directors and the independence of the outside auditors who review the accuracy of corporate financial statements. This paper will look to provide an oversight of the law and how it pertains to the standards in Accounting and Finance departments nowadays. In addition, this paper will also touch on the ongoing costs and benefits of the now......

Words: 3586 - Pages: 15

Sox Anaylzation

...Group 2 Assignment: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) & Financial Statements Accuracy University of Maryland University College Geralda Francois Courtney Holbrook Nicole Mone Walker Moyosore Bankole AMBA630 Mark Wylie August 18, 2015 Introduction The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was created after the Great Depression of the 1930’s, and given a mandate to oversee US financial markets. Since then its basic policy has been to promote transparency in corporate finance, through the full disclosure of companies’ financial performances. This allowed the SEC to maintain a strong track record of corporate financial disclosure oversight through the 1990’s, when a period of rapid stock market growth and crashes rocked the system (Introduction to SOX, n.d). During that period, companies such as Enron and Sunbeam Corporation abruptly filed for bankruptcy or devalued overnight. This occurred largely because they concealed the real state of their financial health on audit reports (Livingston, 2003, p.7). In response to these scandals the US Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). Many of the provisions in SOX give additional powers to the SEC, including jurisdiction over the new Public Accounting Oversight Board and oversight over private industry Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS). Moreover, U.S. public company CEOs and CFOs must certify the accuracy of financial......

Words: 3587 - Pages: 15

Role and Function of Pcaob

...Role and function of the PCAOB and AS 5 and AS 11 Ramecha Davis This paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Auditing BUS5423 Section 70 Texas Woman’s University Dr. John Nugent April 20, 2015 Abstract The purpose of this research paper is to provide an in depth review of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and how it contributes to the interest of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. The research highlights the importance of the PCAOB’s role in the accounting profession as well as prospective changes that may evolve in the future related to PCAOB. Upon reading this research the reader will be familiar with PCAOB’s roles and functions, as well as auditing standards (AS) released such as AS5 and AS11. The PCAOB’s significance in the protection of investors is revealed as well. Keywords: SEC, PCAOB, SOX, AS 5, AS 11, Internal Control, Materiality Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………….5 PCAOB…………….……………………………………..……………………………….……….……5-6 a) The PCAOB Mission, Vision, & Core Values………………………………….………........6-7 b) Current Standards…………………………………………………………….…..............…7-8 c) Future Standard Plans…………………………………………………………………….…8-9 Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 Section 404……………………………………………………………...….9 a) Auditing Standard 5…………………………………………………………………….….9-10 b) Auditing Standard 11……………………………………………………………………..10-12 c) Communication Requirements..............................

Words: 4910 - Pages: 20

The Sox

...The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was the result of innumerable corporate scandals such as Enron, WorldCom and Tyco. These companies were misrepresenting their financial reporting to investors and stakeholders to make themselves look more financially stable when in reality they were not. This misrepresentation resulted in huge financial losses and the mistrust of investors in the market. In order to better control financial reporting and restore investors trust, the SOX act was passed. Sarbanes-Oxley aims to enhance corporate governance and strengthen corporate accountability. It does that by: • formalizing and strengthening internal checks and balances within corporations • instituting various new levels of control and sign-off designed to • ensure that financial reporting exercises full disclosure • Corporate governance is transacted with full transparency. (Sarbanes-Oxley Essential Information) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act implemented new standards for financial reporting accountability in a way that CEOS could not pass on the blame to others. They cannot hide behind the “I was not aware of the company’s financial issues “reason anymore. Executives are now held responsible for any financial misrepresentation in their companies’ reporting. They are also held accountable for the design and implementation of new internal control to validate their financial records. Thus, they are responsible of making sure that an internal control report as well as an internal control......

Words: 849 - Pages: 4