Takeover Defenses

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Azua
Words 512
Pages 3
DQ # 4

Takeover refers to a situation where a company seeks to acquire another to expand product breadth, geographic or customer base or it might want to expand and diversify into related or unrelated product markets, pursue undervalued resources, or manipulate financial indicators, including risk profiles, performance variability, and financial leverage (Pearce & Robinson, 2004).On the other hand, hostile take-over involves an outside entity, making a tender offer to shareholders of a target firm and as suggested by Pearce & Robinson (2004), it involves directly approaching the company’s shareholders ignoring the executives and the board of directors. However, there are appropriate takeover defences that can be utilised to safeguard any hostile takeover and these could be discussed below:

Firstly, poison pill is a defense strategy in which the target company offers its stockholders preferred stock in the merged firm at a highly attractive rate of exchange as a mandatory consequence of a successful takeover (Pearce & Robinson, 2004).. The reason behind this is to dilute the stock such that the attacking firm loses money on its investment. Example research conducted by J.P. Morgan offers evidence that poison pills benefit target firm stockholders.

Secondly, to prevent unwelcome corporate suitors from acquiring enough stock to take control of the corporation, flip-in poison pills can be used and with flip-in options, stockholders are given the right to acquire additional shares in the target company at a substantially lower price than the current offering (Pearce & Robinson, 2004). For example, All American Semiconductor announced in 2000 that its board had adopted a flip-in poison pill to be activated when a pursuer announced a tender offer that would result in its owning 15 percent of the common…...

Similar Documents

Defenses

...assumption of the risk doctrine applies to absolve the landowner from liability for injuries sustained if the plaintiff: (1) knows of the risk or hazard, and (2) voluntarily proceeds in that activity. There is substantial uncertainty as to the status of the assumption of the risk doctrine in Pennsylvania. Which party bears the burden to establish these elements is currently the subject of debate in Pennsylvania courts. Uncertainty arises as to whether assumption of the risk is part of the duty analysis, therefore making it a question of law and placing the burden of proof on the plaintiff or a question of fact for the jury. Traditionally, assumption of the risk was viewed as an affirmative defense placing the burden of proof on the defendant. B. Duty Analysis vs. Affirmative Defense Most recently the Pennsylvania Superior Court examined the doctrine of assumption of the risk in Zachardy v. Geneva College, 733 A.2d 648 (Pa.Super. 1999) appeal denied 751 A.2d 193 (Pa. 2000). In Zachardy, plaintiff, a baseball player for Point Park College, stepped in a divot/hole/imperfection in the outfield while in pursuit of a fly ball and suffered an injury to his knee. Plaintiff asserted defendant, Geneva College, failed to maintain the ball field in a reasonably safe condition. The court acknowledged that assumption of the risk involved two components; the first, plaintiff’s knowledge or awareness of the risk, and the second, plaintiff’s voluntarily facing the risk. Id. at 651.......

Words: 4686 - Pages: 19

Hostile Takeover

...NO. 6 • DEC. 2000 Hostility in Takeovers: In the Eyes of the Beholder? G. WILLIAM SCHWERT* ABSTRACT This paper examines whether hostile takeovers can be distinguished from friendly takeovers, empirically, based on accounting and stock performance data. Much has been made of this distinction in both the popular and the academic literature, where gains from hostile takeovers result from replacing incumbent managers and gains from friendly takeovers result from strategic synergies. Alternatively, hostility could ref lect strategic choices made by the bidder or the target. Empirical tests show that most deals described as hostile in the press are not distinguishable from friendly deals in economic terms, except that hostile transactions involve publicity as part of the bargaining process. THE PERCEPTION OF HOSTILITY in American takeovers has had important connotations in both the popular and the academic literature. Unwelcome bids are often perceived to threaten at least some of the stakeholders in target corporations, leading to extensive defensive reactions by the management of the target firm. In contrast, friendly takeovers are often seen to create synergies that make both the bidder and the target firm better off ~see, for example, Mørck, Shleifer, and Vishny ~1988, 1989!!. The distinction between hostile and friendly takeovers is also important if removing an inefficient target management team creates the gains from hostile takeovers. Manne ~1965! refers to this as......

Words: 20546 - Pages: 83

Blackberry Takeover

...Legal Aspects of BLACKBERRY Takeover by FAIRFAX Legal Aspects of BLACKBERRY Takeover by FAIRFAX by by Anubhav Gaur SMBA12045 Section B Anubhav Gaur SMBA12045 Section B TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknoledgement Summary blackberry ltd. Section 1.1 : History Section 1.2 : Strategic Changes Section 1.3 : Success in Market place Section 1.4 : Changes in Financial Fortunes Section 1.5 : Financial Fortunes FAIRFAX LTD. Section 2.1 : Corporate Governance Section 2.2 : History Section 2.3 : Credit Ratings MERGERS & ACQUISATIONS Section 3.1 : Legal Structures Section 3.2 : Documentation Section 3.3 : Business Valuation TAKEOVERS Section 4.1 : Types Of Takeover Section 4.2 : Financing a Takeover Section 4.3 : Mechanics Section 4.4 : Strategies Section 4.5 : Agency Problems Section 4.6 : Pros & Cons Laws & Codes used during takeover Section 5.1 : City Code on Takeovers & Mergers Section 5.2 : Competetion Law Section 5.3 : Takeover Directives Section 5.4 : Companies ACT 1985 BLACKBERRY TAKEOVER REGULATORY APPROVAL COMPETETION COMMISION FOR TAKE OVER FCPA Section 8.1 : Provision & Scope Section 8.2 : History Section 8.3 : Requirements Section 8.4 : Application UK BRIBERY ACT TAKEOVER MECHANICS OF BLACKBERRY TAKEOVER CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENCES ACKNOLEGDEMENT I take this opportunity to express my profound gratitude and deep regards to my guide Prof. Deepak Dayal for his exemplary guidance,...

Words: 23370 - Pages: 94

The Apple Takeover

...The Apple Takeover Devry University ENGL 112 Professor Jonathan Tosch People spend hundreds of dollars on iPhones every year; they all seem to have the same features and capabilities, but the size and color of the phone. I’ve watched consumers stand in long lines for the latest iPhone, people stay up all night trying to purchase them online, only to do it all again when the newest iPhone is released. I for one refuse to pay that much for any type of phone, but the craze really caught my eye and I wanted to research what all of the hype is about the iPhone takeover. Being a parent my teenage daughter is always saying she is team iPhone and argues with her friends about her iPhone being better than an android device, so I decided to take a trip to the Apple to get some background knowledge and to play with the device. At this point I’m sure everyone wishes they were Steve Jobs and could invent such a popular device. The iPhone has already re-formulated itself five times. It started out as a big black phone with few accessories and cases now it is a small square with many accessories and features. But once they changes from the iPhone 4 to the 4S now the iPhone 5 I don’t see any major differences in the phone, but yet consumers are still purchasing them with the few changes that are being made. The iPhone by Apple is advancement to the mobile communicator. The iPhone combines a cell phone, with tablet capabilities with features such as email, internet and......

Words: 814 - Pages: 4

Defense

...Choose two of the defenses or syndrome outlined in this chapter and explain why you think they should or should not be accepted as a defenses in criminal law cases. The insanity defense states that you committed the alleged crime, but had no knowledge of the act that were committed at the time was right or wrong. I believe it should be allowed as a defense in criminal law cases, but due to the difficulty in proving beyond the reasonable doubt that the criminal was insane during the commitment of their crimes and the ethical implications of allowing disturbed criminals to avoid imprisonment. But I also agree that individuals should not be punished for criminal acts if they lack certain characteristics that relate to the ability to engage in rational thinking, including wrongfulness and consequences of their actions, or control their behavior. Those psychopathic traits may be inherited, that has set the stage for arguments that even those who commit the worst of crimes should not be held responsible for them. After all, they didn’t choose their genetic makeup or to be born without the capacity for understanding. When it has been successful, the apparent key to the success of these defenses lies in the concrete and observable nature of the abnormality: juries can see the tumor on a brain scan, and may be presented with evidence that the criminal behavior did not occur before the injury or that it stops after treatment. Although, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is stated to be...

Words: 632 - Pages: 3

M&a Takeover Code

...MUMBAI S I L IC O N VA L L E Y B A N G A LO R E S IN G A PO R E M U M B A I- B KC NEW DELHI M U N IC H Public M&As in India: Takeover Code Dissected A detailed analysis of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 August 2013 © Copyright 2013 Nishith Desai Associates www.nishithdesai.com M&A Lab Takeover Code Dissected About NDA Nishith Desai Associates (NDA) is a research based international law firm with offices in Mumbai, Silicon Valley, Bangalore, Singapore, New Delhi and Munich. We specialize in strategic legal, regulatory and tax advice coupled with industry expertise in an integrated manner. We focus on niche areas in which we provide significant value and are invariably involved in select highly complex, innovative transactions. Our key clients include marquee repeat Fortune 500 clientele. Our experience with legal, regulatory and tax advice coupled with industry expertise in an integrated manner allows us to provide the complete strategy from the onset through to the full set up of the business and until the exits. We focus on niche areas in which we provide significant value add and are involved in select highly complex, innovative transactions. Core practice areas include Mergers & Acquisitions, International Tax, International Tax Litigation, Fund Formation, Fund Investments, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, Capital Markets, Employment and HR,......

Words: 24805 - Pages: 100

Creamy Creations Takeover

...Search Join Login Help Contact Welcome Anti Essays offers essay examples to help students with their essay writing. Sign Up Creamy Creations Takeover Essay Below is an essay on "Creamy Creations Takeover" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples. Creamy Creations Takeover Organizational and Corporate Communications Chapter 3 Creamy Creations Takeover – COMM-3213 Instructor: Zelda Togun Alethia Uwandu Mid America Christian University Student August 16, 2014 Week 4 conflict Management Assignment P1 The Burger Barn executives see a rosy future ahead for Creamy Creations. Do you see any reasons why they should not be so optimistic? What are the potential future pitfalls they should be watching out for? (150 -200 words) I think that Burger Barn executives may be “counting their chickens before hatching,” for they are looking at the lack of efficiency and the fact that customers would wait for 10 minutes. They should not be so optimistic about the company moving forward in a great way because they are forcing their employees to work harder and faster, which reminds me of Frederick Taylor’s “Theory of Scientific Management,” which he was adamant about “time and motion.” Employees want to feel appreciated and may have enjoyed taking their time......

Words: 550 - Pages: 3

Mergers + Takeovers

...expected synergy achieved through the merger can be attributed to various factors, such as increased revenues, combined talent and technology, or cost reduction. Mergers is the process where by two companies become one. If the companies are listed, the merger may be by agreement, or hostile. However most mergers are agreed. A takeover is where by one business purchases another one either on an agreed or hostile basis. The susceptibility of the company to take over depends on who controls the majority of shares in issue and which share has the voting rights, the value of shares and the company’s performance. When a demerger occurs this is when a copied the divides up its business and sets up the demerged parts as a completely different company or companies. When a PLC demerges shareholders Will end up holding shares in the new companies as well as what remains of the existing company. Recent examples of mergers include: * Orange and T-Mobile combining to make EE * PC World and Currys merged. Recent examples of takeovers include: * BT has made a £12.5bn acquisition of EE, the UK's largest mobile group * Aviva's £5.6bn takeover of Friends Life creates UK's largest insurer Recent examples of demergers include: * Talk Talk de-merged from Carphone Warehouse in 2010 * Severn Trent Water demerged its waste management business Biffa...

Words: 305 - Pages: 2

Takeover Impact on Stakeholders

...After Kraft announced takeover of Cadbury’s, it announced job losses. TWE do you agree that mergers and takeovers are not always in the best interests of their stakeholders (40) A stakeholder is a group or organisation/institution that has an interest in or is affected by the success of a business. Many stakeholders would argue that takeovers/mergers are not in their best interests because the new ownership will usually cut jobs to reduce costs. This is because the new ownership are likely to have their own HR department, operations, management etc, therefore roles such as middle managers will be regarded as surplus to requirements. Cutting jobs would be supported by shareholders such as shareholders/higher management but opposed by employees and the local community as the firm would not be fulfilling their social responsibility. After cutting jobs, the firm will then transfer production overseas as another method of cutting costs which will be supported by management and customers (since the firm may reduce prices), however it will be opposed by the local community because of the job losses and impact on the economy incurred. However if a firm decides not to transfer production overseas they may introduce more capital intensive labour and replace human workers as a method of reducing long term costs which will be favoured by customers and shareholders but opposed by employees. However whilst most takeovers will favour the cutomer, the firm taking ownership may rise prices......

Words: 1149 - Pages: 5

Tabathas Salon Takeover

...Tabatha’s Salon Takeover Tabatha’s Salon Takeover is a reality show in which Sear Genius contestant and hair salon owner, Tabatha Coffey helps failing salons turn around in one week. In class we viewed the hair salon “Ten”, which was a perfect example of a failing salon. Management is what drives a business, is the act of controlling and making decisions about a business. Without a good manager every business will go down eventually. Ten was founded by a woman. She was the manager of her own business and she set an autocratic leadership style where her employees have to obey her instructions without questioning and without receiving and explanation for such instructions. She micromanages the salon. She has many books where she explains how does she wants things, the employees are supposes to memorize and follow the protocols she set. This book includes scripts on what they should say when a customer come and rules on how to do every task. She lacks communication by relying heavily on her employees to learn. Ten is an informal business, where responsibilities are not well distributed. There are a lot of responsibilities for the managers and the owners and also the secretaries. There seems to be flexibility in how they run the salon, because they have a hairdresser who works there but actually cants work on the floor because he has not been approved yet. The Salon also needs to improve their leadership department, because the manager does not accomplish many of the......

Words: 513 - Pages: 3

Defense

...We, the defense, believe that our client took the reasonable steps to ascertain the age of N.O. As set out in Regina V. SLATER in the Saskatchewan court of appeal (2005) * appeal was denied because the crown proved that slater had not taken all the reasonable steps to ascertain the ages of his victims. * We believe that our client did indeed take all the reasonable steps to determine age before engaging in sexual activity with N.O. The first step outlined by Justice Jackson was Physical appearance. In relation to this step the defense would like to introduce exhibits A & B 1st slide: Notice the similarities of exhibit A to our complainant, she has large breasts and fits into the category of a 34-22-30 measurement. 2nd slide: Although exhibit B has smaller breasts she still fits into the same category as N.O. So put yourself in the shoes of our client, now can you guess how old she is? The next reasonable step that Justice Jackson pointed out was…Behaviour the fact that N.O. was observed drinking alcohol& smoking marijuana at a biker bush party can be used as relevant information pertaining to Chester’s belief that N.O. was not actually 13 In relation to our case The third step stated was…. The ages and appearances of those whose company the complaint has been found in…on this particular night N.O. had been found in the presence of bikers. it is reasonable to assume that to a be a biker one must hold a valid driver’s license. This makes majority of......

Words: 407 - Pages: 2

Us Defense

...United States has many more problems it should be placing its focus on aside from building an already overwhelming military power. These things range from National Debt, the current Healthcare/Education system in place, Where all the tax money and how much is actually going into the military, and space exploration. “Cutting Military Spending Does Not Mean Cutting Defense”(Paul 2). As said by Ron Paul, a US Representative, many people are beginning to realise the defense spending issue. Some worry that cutting this budget will decrease the safety of the United States. Here will be the facts you should need to know on this budget, it’s impact on the United States as a whole, and its effect on the non militaristic part of the country, and the world. Not to mention, what this money could be used for, rather than fighting wars. Let’s get into my first topic, recognizing the numbers going into the US Military and defense, maybe people are not as affected or aware of it because they do not know the values. According to nationalpriorities.org, 53.71% of the United States federal budget discretionary funding, is put into defense and the military. Yes, that is more than half, the federal budget in 2015 was 3.8 trillion dollars, 1.11 trillion in discretionary funding. To put that into a larger scale, 21% of the US economy. Of that 1.11 trillion, 598.49 billion or once again, 53.71% is put into the military, and this is concerning for other reasons in which will be discussed later on.......

Words: 1699 - Pages: 7

The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers

...The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers Author(s): Richard Roll Source: The Journal of Business, Vol. 59, No. 2, Part 1 (Apr., 1986), pp. 197-216 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2353017 Accessed: 10/02/2010 10:10 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The......

Words: 8676 - Pages: 35

Abortion Defense

... abortion is not murdering an innocent fetus and that the arguments for pro-choice are stronger than the ones for pro-life. I do want to end this essay by stating that I am not in favor of abortion or do I think people should take it lightly, it is a very serious matter. However, after reading and analyzing the arguments made by both sides I determined that the pro-choice side is one that makes the most sense. Word Count-1,702 Works Cited Hursthouse, Rosalin. "Virture Theory and Abortion." Shaw, William H. Social and Personal Ethics . Boston: Wadsworth , 2011. 125-132. Marquis, Don. "An Argument That Abortion is Wrong ." Shaw, William. Social and Personal Ethics . Boston: Wadsworth , 2011. 109-115. Thomson, Judith Jarvis. "A Defense of Abortion ." Shaw, William. Social and Personal Ethics . Boston: Wadsworth , 2011. 117-124. Warren, Mary Anne. "The Moral Status of Abortion ." Shaw, William H. Social and Personal Ethics . Boston : Wadsworth , 2011. 101-108....

Words: 1818 - Pages: 8

Hostile Takeovers Microsoft V. Oracle

...PeopleSoft v. Oracle: Hostilities Involved in a Takeover Precious Richey OMM 640 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility (MFF1226A) Instructor – Ken Edick Submitted: 7/23/2012 Abstract The hostile takeover of PeopleSoft by Oracle was the results of a lengthy court battle that raised many issues. One issue in particular concerned anti-trust laws and their application to technology companies. The Department of Justice, in an attempt to block the takeover, argued that a merger of this nature would lessen competition and ultimately limit customer choice. An appellant court judge ruled that this case did not meet the criterion of an anti-trust breach and ruled in favor of Oracle. Never the less, many other factors concerning the role of shareholders, the board of directors and chief officers gave rise to some grey areas. It has been speculated that the outcome of this case has paved the way for similar acquisitions in the technology arenas. The hostile take-over bid by Oracle to acquire the controlling shares of PeopleSoft was a long and drawn out acquisition. The process was marked with uncertainties, government intervention, and changed trends. Some analysis considered the move to be a merger while others considered it to be a consolidate that served as a prelude to the inevitable changes in the software market. In 2003 when Oracle’s CEO announced plans to wage an unsolicited takeover of PeopleSoft’s stock (Boatright, 2009), the decision was met......

Words: 1387 - Pages: 6