The Functions of the United States Supreme Court

In: Historical Events

Submitted By damarisquinonez
Words 432
Pages 2
The function of the Supreme Court as it is presented in Article III of the United States Constitution is saying that the government can do whatever it wants to do. With this, there is no higher court that the Supreme Court, inferior courts may from time to time establish the law. A judge may stay in his position as long as he/she behaves well. All cases heard have the quality of being fair under the Constitution and Judicial powers. All trials should be held in the state where a person lives or the state where the crime was committed. No person should be convicted of harming the government unless that there are two witnesses.
What is the main function of the Supreme Court? The main function of the Supreme Court is to interpret the law in accordance to the United States Constitution in a fair way. “That court maintains balance between state and nation through the maintenance of the rights and duties of individuals.” (pg.27. Judicial Process in America 8th Edition.) When a case makes it to the Supreme Court the decision within the matter is final, there’s no overturn for it.
What is meant by “original jurisdiction” and what kind of cases it hears? When we say “original jurisdiction” it means that the Supreme Court hears a case from the beginning. It will hear cases for the first time with Ambassadors, public ministers, controversies between two or more states and citizens of different states. The Supreme Court will also hear cases to review the lower court decisions. “Throughout history it has dealt with a select set of policies.” (Chapter 15, Judicial Process in America 8th Edition.)
The nomination process for the Supreme court justices has a select criteria which includes merit, because a president seeks a qualified nominee who has a legal or public career. Personal and political friendships are important, policy preferences are influential…...

Similar Documents

United States Court Systems Essay

...your about to read consists of the federal court system, federal court’s jurisdictions, and lastly I’m going to compare the federal court system to the state of Georgia’s court system. Let’s start with the federal court system, which consist of three tiers. The Federal Courts According to the Paralegal Professional by Henry R. Cheeseman and Thomas F. Goldman, the trial courts of the federal system is the District Courts (2011, p.211). Cheeseman and Goldman say there are 94 district courts in the federal court system (2011, p.211). Also in their 2011 book, they say the district courts are decided by geographical area and how populated that area is (Cheeseman, p.211). Lastly, Cheeseman and Goldman state that there is at least one District Court in every state (2011, p.211). Next, is the intermediate appellate court in the federal court system. The Paralegal Professional says the U.S. Court of Appeals is the intermediate appellate court in the federal court system (Cheeseman, p.211). Cheeseman and Goldman also say there are thirteen circuits, which are the geographical area that the court serves (2011, p.211). They also state that the courts can only take appeals from inside their circuit (2011, p.211). According to their 2011 book, each circuit has a three judge panel and someone in a case can request a review after the judges make their decision (Cheeseman, p.211). The last part of the federal court system is the highest court of the federal system. According to......

Words: 833 - Pages: 4

The Supreme Court

...The Supreme Court Leshea Hicks Professor Dorothy Sliben LEG420 January 22, 2012 The United States Supreme Court is the last level at the federal level. It is also the only court mentioned in the Constitution. “The constitution states, “the judicial power of the United States shall be in one supreme court”, and Congress may ordain and establish from time to time” (Champion, Hartley & Rabe, 2008). The Supreme Court consists of eight associate justices and one chief justice. Each year the court hears a limited amount of cases if requested. They usually meet on the first Monday in October thru late June; the justices typically meet three times per week to hear cases. They meet also to decide which cases they will take for each session. Most cases brought before the Supreme Court started at the federal or state level, and usually involve constitutional issues, such as immigration laws, abortion, and same sex marriages. The purpose of the Supreme Court is to monitor the actions of the President and Congress. The Supreme Court can advise the President of wrongdoings considered unconstitutional. The court has the power to veto a law passed by Congress, when it violates the constitution. “The Supreme Court is the final judge in all cases involving laws of Congress and the highest law of the Constitution” (“Role of the,” ). The Supreme Court has two main functions: First, to interpret and explain congressional enactments in cases. They interpret state laws......

Words: 678 - Pages: 3

Supreme Court Rise to Power

...different branches. Each branch was meant to keep the other in check and make sure that they did not abuse their powers. The branches of government were as follow the lawmaking, executive and the jurisdictive. The constitution started out has simple two page document because the founding fathers couldn’t agree on much of anything. When the framers first thought of the Supreme Court they were thinking of a branch of government that would have supreme power. This is evident by the way each branch is laid out in the establishment. Each branch of government has its power expounded to them in detail. When it came to the court the description of power became vague. Some scholars believe that the founding fathers didn’t give the Supreme Court as many restrictions because they wanted a court of judge that would rule and intrepid the constitution as they would. The constitution was never meant to govern the people of America it was meant to rule and control them. The founding fathers picked people for the court that had the same backgrounds as them. According to the how the constitution is worded the framers gave the court the right to make law based on thing un for seen by them. This means that they have the right to make laws on thing that are being invented and used by Americans today The responsibilities and limitations of each branch of government are set forth in the constitution. For example specific powers are granted to the congress concerning their jurisdiction and job......

Words: 3569 - Pages: 15

Supreme Court Gun Rulings

...Lopez vs. the United States: a look at Supreme Court gun law cases, rulings, and the current abuse of executive privilege under the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment to the Constitution is the right to keep and bear arms by every law abiding citizen in the United States. In this dialog, we will look at the aforementioned Supreme Court cases to better understand the limitations of the Central Governments ability to interfere with this individual right. In the case of the District of Columbia vs. Heller, the primary issue in this case was the complete ban of handguns in homes within the District of Columbia unless they are unserviceable. This case was brought by Dick Heller in an action claiming that a complete ban violates the 2nd Amendment right guaranteed to the citizens of this country. In the case of Lopez vs. the United States, Congress attempted to control where individuals could carry weapons through the invalid use and exercise of the commerce clause power. At first look into the District of Columbia vs. Heller case, the power to solicit and control gun regulation belongs to the States, not the Federal Government. The District of Columbia is not a state and therefore does not possess the authority to install gun regulations on the citizenry living there as they are residents of Maryland and Virginia and are so governed by the gun laws which exist in those states depending on which state they are......

Words: 1356 - Pages: 6

The United States Dual Court System and Its Historical Developments

...The United States Dual Court System and its Historical Developments The United States court system is divided between two administratively separate parts. The first was established in early colonial times. The original thirteen colonies had established their own individual court systems based off the English system (The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed., 2007). According to an article “Early Development of the United States Court System US Courts in the Early Republic” written by Martin Kelly “In 1789 Article Three of the US Constitution stated that "[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." (Kelly, 2012) ” This article of the US Constitution created the Federal Court System. Because each of the original colonies had an established court system, the two court systems evolved separately into today’s modern dual court system (Kelly, 2012). This essay will break down the major historical events in the United States Court system to include probation, parole, and juvenile courts and how they have transformed todays United States Dual court system. In the late 19th century and early 20th century a social movement known as Progressivism had a strong hand in creating and molding the US Court systems. This movement primary goal toward the court systems was to change the thinking from retribution to rehabilitation (Net Industries, 2012). As the......

Words: 864 - Pages: 4

Analysis of the Supreme Court of the United States Case of Faragher V. City of Boca Raton

...Case Review #1: Analysis of the Supreme Court of the United States case of Faragher V. City of Boca Raton (5 points).   Search the internet and find The Supreme Court of the United States case of Faragher V. City of Boca Raton.    Analyze and present a summary of the case. When preparing the summary, make sure you answer the following questions: 1. Why was the case brought? Give a summary of the factors that led to the case. The case is around Beth Ann Farangher, she was a lifeguard that brought to the city’s attention that her supervisors, Bill Terry and David Silverman, had created a “sexually hostile atmosphere” at work. The two super visors would initiate constant offensive touching that was un-invited and also speak about women in offensive terms. Farangher stated that Terry would repeatedly touch the female life guards without being invited to do so. The complaint contained allegations that Terry once said the he would never promote a woman to the rank of lieutenant. Silver man had also said to Faragher, “Date me or clean toilets for a year.” A major problem with the case was if the problem had been going on for a while, then it should have been brought to the city’s attention earlier. 2. Based on the case what are two defenses against sexual harassment that can be used by an employer? 3. What is the relevance of this case to Human Resource Management? The result of the Farangher case is relevant is human resource management because the manner......

Words: 311 - Pages: 2

The United States Court System

...The United States Court System Dona' De Kendricks CJA 224 March 20, 2011 Christopher Bragg Abstract The U.S. Constitution creates a dual federal court system in which the power is shared between the state and the federal governments. Each of these courts systems are composed of their own courts. State courts have the highest power in general. Within the courts there are trial and appellate courts. These two are considered to work together when there are issues within cases. When a case has any issues in the trial courts it will go to the appellate court for review. The United States court system help serve justice. United States Court System In 1789 Congress convened and emerged with the Judiciary Act of 1789, setting up a judicial system composed of a Supreme Court, Appellate Courts, and Trial Courts. The Constitution created three branches of government the executive, legislative, and the judicial court. The federal court of the United States derives its name and power from Article III of the Constitution. Article III and Section 1 establishes the Supreme Court and provides Congress the power to establish lower federal courts. Congress established the Appellate Courts consist of 12 regional court of appeals and one Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit; the Trial Courts consist of 94 Court Districts, the Bankruptcy Court, the Court of International Trade, and the Court of Federal Claims.......

Words: 1421 - Pages: 6

United States Courts

...The United States courts and history and its purpose has been a strong order of justice in the nation since the first time it was established. The system was designed to allow the citizens of the United States to receive a fair criminal trial regardless of social status, gender, race, and ethnic background. The system is composed by several different elements and processes that are at times very complicated. The best way to understand how the system works is to examine the structure and function of the different courts in America. This paper will describe a court and its purpose, define the dual court system and describe the role that early legal codes, the common law, and precedent played in the development of courts. In addition it will also identify the role of courts in criminal justice today. Over time, the court systems have established a sense of regularity or systematic procedures. The court system in the United States has a federal system of government in which power is divided between a central authority and smaller local units of government. The system has a dual system of federal and state courts that are independent of one another. Each state has its own system; the authority of a court to decide a case is called its jurisdiction. The Courts have jurisdiction only within geographical boundaries. This limits a particular city court to try cases that arise outside the city limits, on the same token, courts in one state rarely have jurisdiction over events......

Words: 763 - Pages: 4

U.S. Supreme Court United States V. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 (1981) 449 U.S. 411 United States V. Cortez Et Al. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

...U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. CORTEZ, 449 U.S. 411 (1981) 449 U.S. 411 UNITED STATES v. CORTEZ ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 79-404. Argued December 1, 1980 Decided January 21, 1981 Based on their discovery of sets of distinctive human footprints in the desert, Border Patrol officers deduced that on a number of occasions groups of from 8 to 20 persons had been guided by a person, whom they designated "Chevron," from Mexico across an area of desert in Arizona, known to be heavily trafficked by aliens illegally entering the country. These groups of aliens proceeded to an isolated point on a road to be picked up by a vehicle; the officers deduced the vehicle probably approached from the east and returned to the east after the pickup. They also surmised, based on the times when the distinctive tracks were discovered, that "Chevron" generally traveled on clear nights during or near weekends, and arrived at the pickup point between 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. On the basis of this information, the officers stationed themselves at a point east of the probable pickup point on a night when they believed there was a strong possibility that "Chevron" would be smuggling aliens. The officers observed a pickup truck with a camper shell suitable for carrying sizable groups pass them heading west and then observed the same vehicle return within the estimated time for making a round trip to the pickup point. The officers......

Words: 4188 - Pages: 17

Supreme Court of the United States

...Supreme Court of the United States, In the case of the Supreme Court of the United States, Michael D. Crawford v. Washington. Michael Crawford was tried for assault and attempted murder for stabbing a man who was named, Kenneth Lee. Crawford stabbed Lee at his apartment on on August 5,1999. Police arrested petitioner later that night. Crawford claimed he had acted in self-defense when he believed Lee had picked up a weapon. Lee denied doing anything that might make Crawford believe he was trying to attack him. Michael Crawford contended that Lee had attempted to rape his wife, Sylvia. The police arrested him for the stabbing, and after giving both Michael and his wife, Sylvia, Miranda warnings, they interrogated both husband and wife twice. The statement Michael challenged under the Confrontation Clause came from a tape recorded interrogation of Sylvia. In her second interrogation, she gave a version of the fight between Michael and the alleged victim that at least appeared inconsistent with her husband’s self-defense claim. Sylvia’s tape recorded statement was introduced at trial against Michael even though he had no opportunity for cross examination. In reviewing the statement’s admission by the trial court, the Washington Court of Appeals and Washington Supreme Court applied slightly different tests grounded in the framework described......

Words: 3781 - Pages: 16

The Supreme Court

...The Supreme Court The purpose of the Supreme Court is to review or address cases that involve issues on a federal level or of constitutional law, just as appellate courts hear cases on a state level. Their responsibilities include deciding how to apply the principles of constitutional law to new matters and issues that arise in today’s day to day legal process; they also play the role of the “parent” to lower federal appellate courts when their decisions on legal issues are contradicting to one another, overlap, goes against constitutional rights, or allows room for confusion as to whose decision takes precedent. Bottom line the purpose of the Supreme Court is to provide the rules and statues for state level courts to abide by when they involve federal or constitutional matters, making them the highest court of law. The Supreme Court is made up of nine judges or justices of the peace that are appointed by the President of the United States and the advice of the senate, their titles include one chief and eight associates that serve a life term. By law there are no particular requirements, educational experience or background, or law degrees necessary to become a Supreme Court judge, but because the advice of senate is used by the President of the United States to select the justices their experience and background is taken into consideration. These nine justices makeup what is considered a full court, however it only takes six justices to makeup a lawful bench and in some......

Words: 951 - Pages: 4

Supreme Court

... A supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of many legal jurisdictions. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, instance court, judgment court, apex court, and highest court of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts. However, not all highest courts are named as such. Civil law states do not tend to have singular highest courts. Additionally, the highest court in some jurisdictions is not named the "Supreme Court", for example, the High Court of Australia; this is because decisions by the High Court could formerly be appealed to the Privy Council. In a few places, the court named the "Supreme Court" is not in fact the highest court; examples include the New York Supreme Court, which is superseded by the New York Court of Appeals, and the former Supreme Court of Judicature of England and Wales. Some countries have multiple "supreme courts" whose respective jurisdictions have different geographical extents, or which are restricted to particular areas of law. In particular, countries with a federal system of government typically have both a federal supreme court, and supreme courts for each member state, with the former having jurisdiction over the latter only to the extent that the federal constitution......

Words: 4621 - Pages: 19

California Supreme Court

...Court system of California is the largest systems about 12% of the U.S population are served. Major cases California courts starts in trail courts which are present in each and every 58 counties of California State. These courts hear criminal, civil, family, juvenile, probate, mental health and traffic cases. Before courts of appeal Supreme Court review most of the cases. Supreme Court is the highest Court in the California and reviews decisions of the court of appeal in order to solve the conflicts and settle the law questions. California Supreme Court has one Chief Justice and six Associate Justices. It has 7907 fillings and about eighty five written opinions. Each Justice is appointed by Governor. The decision of Supreme Court provides guidance for the lower courts which shows effects on the residents of California. Supreme Court has decisions to decide which decisions can be review but is definitely want to review all the cases where death penalty is imposed. Supreme Court can also review the decisions of state Bar of California regarding the suspension of judges for misconduct. All the decisions of Supreme Court are in the form of written and available for public. They are made accessible through websites and official reports. Supreme Court functions for the development of law which are applied by trial and appellate courts. Supreme Courts reviews cases which will enable it to settle legal questions and to see that the law is uniformly applied throughout the state.......

Words: 295 - Pages: 2

United States Tax Court Opinion 2009-144

...UNITED STATES TAX COURT Opinion 2009-144 JANELLO S. DUNGCA AND MARIA C. GUTIERREZ, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 17802-08S. Filed September 17, 2009. Janello S. Dungca and Maria C. Gutierrez, pro sese. Matthew D. Carlson, for respondent. Introduction This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed. The respondent determined a $33,091 income tax deficiency and a $6,618 section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty for the petitioners’ 2005 tax year. Issues presented for consideration are: (1) Whether petitioners are entitled to deduct gambling losses; and (2) whether petitioners are liable for a section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty. Background During 2005, petitioner Janello S. Dungca (Mr. Dungca) was employed by a consulting company in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. His consulting assignment from January 1 through July 30, 2005, was at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Approximately every other weekend during that period, the petitioners visited a gambling establishment named Canterbury Park that offered wagering on horse racing. Mr. Dungca was an inveterate gambler, and since 1991 he had spent a good amount of his nonworking time gambling. Mr. Dungca would retain betting slips, receipts, and records of cash withdrawals, and at the end of each day he would record the day’s bets, winnings, and cash withdrawals (cash in and out)...

Words: 1190 - Pages: 5

The Function of Parole in the United States

...The Function of Parole in the United States When the subject of parole comes up many things come to mind, such as who make the decisions to release inmates from prison, who is on parole, who supervises them and how, who sends them back to prison, does it work, is it effective, is the community safe, and so on. To begin, lets define what parole is. Parole is a method of releasing offenders from prison prior to the expiration of their sentence (McCarthy and Leone, 121). Inmates are screened for the suitability for release based upon the risk they pose to the public (McCarthy and Leone, 121). If for some reason the parolee’s performance on parole is unsatisfactory, then they may have their parole revoked and be returned to prison. Some people think that parole is a waste of time and that offenders should just be left in prison to do their time and that is that. However, other people think that these offenders have a chance at being rehabilitated with parole and can help them become better people. I think if some of these offenders have been doing well in prison and can be released early under supervision of a parole agency, then they deserve a chance to try and make their lives better for themselves and even their loved ones. This kind of a program could really help some of these offenders get their lives back on track and get them stepping on the right path again. Parole, however, is not for every offender. Some offenders may get released on parole, but do not end up......

Words: 2455 - Pages: 10