Free Essay

Towards a Better Understanding of Social Entrepreneurship: Some Important Distinction

In: Business and Management

Submitted By yirene
Words 2544
Pages 11
Towards a Better Understanding of Social Entrepreneurship

Some Important Distinctions

Jerr Boschee and Jim McClurg

In this short article the authors outline the four key distinctions that differentiate non-profit social entrepreneurial organisations from other types of charitable non-profit organisations who claim to be making use of social entrepreneurial approaches.

Towards a Better Understanding of Social Entrepreneurship

Some Important Distinctions

Jerr Boschee and Jim McClurg

Contents: • Introduction • Four Key Distinctions 1. The differences between “entrepreneurship” and “social entrepreneurship” 2. The differences between “sustainability” and “self-sufficiency” 3. The differences between “earned income strategies” and “social purpose business ventures” 4. The differences between “innovators”, “entrepreneurs” and “professional managers” • Some Final Thoughts • Social Enterprise Definition • Further Information

Introduction
“Social entrepreneurship” is one of the most misunderstood phrases in the non-profit sector today. Everybody, it seems, has a different definition of what it means. This is our attempt to bring some clarity to the discussion. Our perspective has been shaped by 50 years of experience in the field, one as head of a national consulting firm and the other as the chief executive officer of a US$ 15 million social enterprise.

Twenty years ago the idea of non-profits acting in an entrepreneurial manner was anathema to most people in the sector: The idea of merging mission and money filled them with distaste. But the phrase “social entrepreneur” is bandied about freely these days.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair praises the emerging tide of “social entrepreneurs” that is changing the face of England’s voluntary sector and senior executives in the independent sector talk about “social entrepreneurs” in the United States who find new and exciting ways to attract contributions and government support for their programs. Both are right to praise the ingenuity of non-profit organisations – but most of what they are praising has nothing to do with entrepreneurship.

Here is the gist of the problem:

Unless a non-profit organisation is generating earned revenue from its activities, it is not acting in an entrepreneurial manner.

It may be doing good and wonderful things, creating new and vibrant programs:

But it is innovative, not entrepreneurial.

Why is the distinction important? Because only earned income will ever allow a non-profit to become sustainable or self-sufficient. Innovation is a precious resource and it served as the primary engine of non-profit growth through the 1970s and 1980s. But innovation can take a non-profit only so far. It is one thing to design, develop and implement a new program – and quite another to sustain it without depending on charitable contributions and public sector subsidies.

The rules of the game for non-profits have changed dramatically during the past 20 years. Operating costs have soared, resources available from traditional sources have flattened, the number of non-profits competing for grants and subsidies has more than tripled, and the number of people in need has escalated beyond our most troubling nightmares. Smart non-profit managers and Board members realise they must increasingly depend on themselves to insure their survival and that has led them naturally to the world of entrepreneurship.

However, too many non-profit managers and trustees continue to use old methodologies and old definitions to gussy up their books and their brochures. It has reached the point where almost everything new in the sector is called “entrepreneurial” and the people who create these new approaches (not to mention the people who write about them and underwrite them) walk away satisfied that they’ve changed the fundamental equation.

They have not.

Four Key Distinctions
As more and more non-profits begin to claim entrepreneurial status, it’s important to make some careful distinctions. The purpose of this essay is to define some core concepts and invite comments from others in the field.

In addition to the differences between entrepreneurship and innovation, we believe there are four other distinctions that are fundamental to any genuine understanding of entrepreneurship in the non-profit sector. These are discussed in the next sections.

1. The differences between “entrepreneurship” and “social entrepreneurship”
According to Webster’s dictionary, an entrepreneur is a person who “organises, manages and assumes the risks of a business enterprise.” In a 1998 column for Inc magazine, Norm Brodsky expanded on the definition. “Starting with nothing more than an idea or a prototype,” he wrote, “entrepreneurs have the ability to take a business to the point at which it can sustain itself on internally generated cash flow.”

The italics belong to us. Successfully running a business means sustaining it with earned income, not grants or subsidies.

The most commonly quoted definition of “social entrepreneurship” today was formulated by Prof. J. Gregory Dees of Stanford University in 1998, but his essay contained a fundamental oversight. He outlines five factors that define social entrepreneurship:

• Adopting a mission to create and sustain social value (not just private value);

• Recognising and relentlessly pursuing new opportunities to serve that mission;

• Engaging in a process of continuous innovation, adaptation, and learning;

• Acting boldly without being limited by resources currently in hand; and

• Exhibiting a heightened sense of accountability to the constituencies served and for the outcomes created.

He never mentions earned income.

We think that is not only conceptual flawed, but also psychologically crippling. It lets non-profits off the hook. It allows them to congratulate themselves for being “entrepreneurial” without ever seriously pursuing sustainability or self-sufficiency. They still return, year after year, to the same individual donors, foundations and government agencies.

What, then, is social entrepreneurship? And how does it differ from entrepreneurship per se? A social entrepreneur is any person, in any sector, who uses earned income strategies to pursue a social objective, and a social entrepreneur differs from a traditional entrepreneur in two ways:

• Traditional entrepreneurs frequently act in a socially responsible manner: They donate money to non-profits; they refuse to engage in certain types of businesses; they use environmentally safe materials and practices; they treat their employees with dignity and respect. All of this is admirable, but their efforts are only indirectly attached to social problems. Social entrepreneurs are different because their earned income strategies are tied directly to their mission: They either employ people who are developmentally disabled, chronically mentally ill, physically challenged, poverty stricken or otherwise disadvantaged; or they sell mission-driven products and services that have a direct impact on a specific social problem (e.g. working with potential dropouts to keep them in school, manufacturing assistive devices for people with physical disabilities, providing home care services that help elderly people stay out of nursing homes, developing and selling curricula).

• Secondly, traditional entrepreneurs are ultimately measured by financial results: The success or failure of their companies is determined by their ability to generate profits for their owners. On the other hand, social entrepreneurs are driven by a double bottom line, a virtual blend of financial and social returns. Profitability is still a goal, but it is not the only goal, and profits are re-invested in the mission rather than being distributed to shareholders.

2. The differences between “sustainability” and “self-sufficiency”
The non-profit sector has traditionally been driven by a “dependency” model, relying primarily on philanthropy, voluntarism and government subsidy, with earned income a distant fourth. But social entrepreneurs have turned that formula on its head: Philanthropy, voluntarism, and government subsidy are welcome, but no longer central, because the dependency model has been replaced by two others. In the non-profit world “sustainability” can be achieved through a combination of philanthropy, government subsidy and earned income. It’s a wonderful thing, sustainability, but for many non-profits it’s only a way station. “Self-sufficiency”, on the other hand, can be achieved only by relying completely on earned income, and is the ultimate goal of the most ambitious social entrepreneurs.

In short, as long as non-profits continue to be dependent on contributions from individuals, grants from Foundations, subsidies from government and other forms of largesse, they will never become sustainable or self-sufficient.

“It’s my theory,” says Kathleen Buescher, President and Chief Executive Officer of Provident Counselling Inc., a US$ 5 million dollar family services organisation in St. Louis, “that non-profits in the future will have to fund a lot of their mission this way. We’re just not going to have sufficient other money to do it. We’ll have to earn it ourselves. And the beauty of making a profit, as we’ve been able to do during the past 15 years is that you can do a lot with the money, you can do what you want to do. You can do it how you want to do it for as long as you want to do it and you don’t have to make anybody happy except your own Board and staff. You don’t have to meet anybody else’s expectations. That’s a very freeing idea, and once you feel it, you don’t want to go back to the confines of any other type of funding.”

3. The differences between “earned income strategies” and “social purpose business ventures”
Many non-profit Board members and executives are daunted by the prospect of social entrepreneurship because they think it means starting a business venture, something few know how to do. But creating a business isn’t the only way to be successful as a social entrepreneur.

In fact the most fertile ground for the vast majority of non-profits is something called “earned income strategies”, and they have nothing to do with starting a business venture. The two approaches differ substantially in terms of purposes, expectations and structure:

• Earned income strategies: Every non-profit has opportunities for earned income lying fallow within its existing programs. The opportunities may be tiny, but exploiting them can have a significant cumulative impact. By aggressively turning inward and searching for pockets of existing opportunities, non-profits have been able to register impressive gains, often raising their percentage of total revenue from earned income by as much as 15 percent within one or two years.

• Business ventures: Once a non-profit has successfully carried out a variety of earned income strategies, it may want to consider launching a formal business venture – but the goals would be much more ambitious and the strategy completely different. The only reason for a non-profit to start a business venture is to exploit a specific opportunity for significant growth and profitability – a substantial difference from earned income strategies, which are designed primarily to cover more of a program’s costs, without any real expectation of making a profit or even reaching a break-even point. The pioneers in the field have also discovered that the chances for success with a business venture increase dramatically if the organisation creates a “skunkworks”, a completely separate entity insulated as much as possible from the day-to-day operations of the organisation. That means having a separate staff, separate compensation policies and even a separate Board of Directors if necessary to achieve as much independence as possible.

4. The differences between “innovators”, “entrepreneurs” and “professional managers”
Perhaps the single most important lesson learned by the pioneers in the field has been a deeply personal one that strikes to the very heart of their self-perceptions. So often, non-profits discover (too late) that their entrepreneurial efforts have been doomed simply because they are being led by people with the wrong types of skills. The mistake occurred because they did not truly understand the difference between:

innovators, entrepreneurs and professional managers.

Regardless of whether a non-profit is attempting to engage in a variety of earned income strategies or trying to launch a business venture, it’s important to understand the differences between the three types of leaders: They are all needed in the evolution of a healthy organisation, but at different times, and rarely does an individual possess more than one of the three skills.

Innovators are the dreamers: They create the prototypes, work out the kinks – and then get bored, anxious to return to what they do best, which is inventing more prototypes. They are rarely concerned, ultimately, with the financial viability of what they do.

Entrepreneurs are builders: They turn prototypes into going concerns – then they get bored. For them, financial viability is the single most important aspect of what they do.

Professional mangers are the trustees: They secure the future by installing and overseeing the systems and infrastructure needed to make sure the going concern keeps going.

Unfortunately, in the non-profit sector, often because resources are scare, organisations try to shoehorn people into positions where they don’t fit, and many of the problems non-profits have when they begin adopting entrepreneurial strategies arise from having an innovator or a professional manager trying to do an entrepreneur’s job.

Some Final Thoughts
The culture of a traditional non-profit, no matter how innovative, is vastly different from the culture if an entrepreneurial non-profit. Entrepreneurs have a higher tolerance of risk, a greater appreciation of margins, and an eagerness to compete. Traditional non-profits distrust the capital markets, prefer collaboration to competition, and underestimate the productive capabilities of their disadvantaged employees. They watch other non-profits become increasingly sustainable or self-sufficient, but are unwilling to emulate their practices.

Instead they criticise. “My god, the resistance,” say Rick Walker, who runs seven small businesses out of his non-profit in Marshfield, Massachusetts. “To a great extent, non-profit people are not risk-takers, and their unwillingness to think outside very standard parameters constantly amazes me. I see a few of them trying things, but usually on a very, very limited scale. Quite frankly, we’ve had a lot better luck getting people outside the non-profit world to understand what we’re doing and feeling comfortable with it.”

Perhaps, if traditional non-profits come to a better understanding of what social entrepreneurship is actually about – if some of the confusing terminology that is currently plaguing the movement can be clarified – more of them will summon the courage to begin emphasising earned income, sustainability and self-sufficiency instead of charitable contributions, government subsidies and eternal dependency.

Copyright ® 2003 Jerr Boschee and Jim McClurg. All rights reserved

Social Enterprise Definition
“Any earned-income business or strategy undertaken by a non-profit distributing organisation to generate revenue in support of its charitable mission. ‘Earned income’ consists of payments received in direct exchange for a product, service or a privilege.”
Source: Social Enterprise Alliance http://www.se-alliance.org

Further Information
Jerr Boschee has spent the past 20 years as an advisor to social entrepreneurs in the United States and abroad; to date he has delivered seminars or conducted workshops in 41 US States and 10 countries and has long been recognised as one of the founders of the social enterprise movement worldwide. He is currently Executive Director of the Institute for Social Entrepreneurs. http://www.socialent.org

Jim McClurg is the former Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Center Industries in Seattle and is currently a partner in the Social Enterprise Alliance, a resource network for social entrepreneurs and their advocates. http://www.se-alliance.org

This article is archived at: http://www.se-alliance.org/better_understanding.pdf.

Further reading: Eight Principles for Non-profit Entrepreneurs by Jerr Boschee can be accessed at http://www.socialent.org/pdfs/8BasicPrinciples.pdf…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Towards a Better Understanding of Supply Chain Quality Management Practices

...TOWARDS A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF SUPPLY CHAIN QUALITY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Article: International Journal of Production Research • This paper reports the result of a comparative study of quality tools and methods adaptation by operations and supply chain managers. • SCQM is defined as a system based approach to performance improvement that leverages opportunities created by upstream and downstream linkages with suppliers and customers. • Operation management is traditional been explained by some version of an ‘inputs-transformation process- outputs’ view of the productive capability of the firms. From Quality perspective, operation managers have focused on internal activities such as process control process improvement, product design improvement and design of experiment. As a result, more and more six-sigma improvement project evolved. • In addition experts like Deming have long emphasized importance of customers and supplier. • In this paper, it explored the difference between quality management practice of operation managers and each type of managers emphasizes supply chain managers, including what quality tools. Tool can here mean the method such as benchmarking, an approach to improving quality such as process improvement team (PIT) and leadership. Literature review and hypothesis development • Supply chain management has developed as a field from the integration of operations and marketing management. As a result, a linkage with upstream firms –......

Words: 962 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Social Entrepreneurship

...Why some of the private institutions and individuals are more successful in rural ventures than govt organisations? India is predominantly an agriculture-based economy, with majority of its population still residing in villages. That would by itself mean that the opportunity and the market to tap into is huge. Another point to note is that when a rural venture is undertaken the main aim may not be profit alone. It is usually accompanied by upliftment and change for the good. We shall first assess the main requirements for any rural venture to be successful and accordingly compare private and government approach. Rural ventures require a different skill set. * Motivation to work in an unstructured environment: Most rural oriented projects are not well organized and structured. It is imperative that anyone involved in this adapt to this set up. Since government is characterized by high degree of protocols and very little freedom, adaptability becomes difficult. Private on the other hand can modify protocols based on the environment and have a very high degree of flexibility. They can also use unconventional methods to obtain results. * Enthusiasm to work: All said and done, in the end for any rural venture to be successful, what is required is a very high degree of enthusiasm, and an urge to excel. Social work is usually characterized by long working hours, unclear goals, sensitivity towards culture, commitment to the goals. Most private ventures enter this field......

Words: 369 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Social Entrepreneurship

...A PROJECT REPORT ON SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP  SUBMITTED BY APOORV CHITNIS FOR THE DEGREE OF THE BACHELOR OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF PROF. BHUMIKA MORE    SIES COLLEGE OF ARTS, SCIENCE AND COMMERCE, NERUL, NAVI MUMBAI-400706 ACADEMIC YEAR 2011-2012    DECLARATION  I, APOORV CHITNIS, studying in T.Y.B.M.S, of S.I.E.S COLLEGE OF ARTS, SCIENCE AND COMMERCE, NERUL hereby declare that I have completed the project on SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP in the year 2011 – 2012 as per the requirements of Mumbai University as a part of Bachelor in Management Studies (B.M.S) programme.  DATE: PLACE: NAVI MUMBAI  __________________ APOORV CHITNIS CERTIFICATE I, BHUMIKA MORE hereby certify that APOORV CHITNIS student OF S.I.E.S COLLEGE OF ARTS, SCIENCE AND COMMERCE, NERUL has completed his field work project on the topic of “SOCIAL ENTREPRENUERSHIP” in the Academic Year 2011-12. The project is based on bonafide information.  _________________ _______________ ______________ Prof. Bhumika More       Prof. Smita. R      Dr. Rita Basu           (Project Guide)       (BMS Coordinator) (Principal)        ________________ External Examiner ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My thanks to my project guide, Prof. Bhumika More for assisting me in every way possible and gently......

Words: 17397 - Pages: 70

Free Essay

Social Entrepreneurship

...of Social Entrepreneurship and the work that a social entrepreneur does. The Report is a guide to learn Social Entrepreneurship through Handson experience. The Report covers my experience in starting a Social Enterprise, difficulties I encountered during the time and how to make a Social Enterprise a Viable option. This report covers everything from rise of this term Social Entrepreneur, to work done by Social Entrepreneurs, to the Entrepreneurial theories and approaches they follow or must follow. This report also describes several Social Ventures and the people behind those ventures who have brought about a positive social change. Social Entrepreneurship is a relatively new phenomenon and the excitement it has created throughout the world because of the impact it has had is tremendous. This report thus describes what learning social entrepreneurship through hands-on experience is. The Report also lists the various people I contacted for Sponsorship and the manner in which they supported the project. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 03 ABSTRACT 04 1. SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 06 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 OBJECTIVES 1.3 METHODOLOGY 1.4 DATA COLLECTION 1.5 CHAPTER SCHEME 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 11 3. HISTORY 17 4. MODERN SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 22 5. SOME OUTSTANDING EXAMPLES 27 6. THEORIES OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP 33 7. CONCLUSION 38 8. BIBILIOGRAPHY 39 6 CHAPTER-1 SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 1.1 INTRODUCTION: Social entrepreneurship is...

Words: 8926 - Pages: 36

Premium Essay

Learning Journal Social Entrepreneurship

...Indian  Institute  of  Management  Calcutta   (IIMC)           “It’s  time  to  care;  it’s  time  to  take  responsibility;  it’s  time  to  lead;   it’s  time  for  a  change."   ―  Steve  Maraboli           Stefania  Lanfranchi   stefania.lanfranchi@student.unisg.ch             CEMS  MIM  BLOCK  SEMINAR  on  SOCIAL  ENTREPRENEURSHIP   Prof.  Devi  Vijay   Number  of  pages:  10   Kolkata,  September  23rd  2013   CEMS  MIM  BLOCK  SEMINAR   Prof.  Devi  Vijay   Indian  Institute  of  Management  Calcutta                             Stefania  Lanfranchi         Introduction   This   paper   constitutes   a   reflection   on   my   learning   gains   as   a   consequence   of   attending   the   CEMS   MIM   BLOCK   SEMINAR   2013   at   the   Indian   Institute   of   Management   Calcutta.   In   the   fol-­‐ lowing,   I   identified   five   topics,   which   to   me,   have   contributed   greatest   to   my   intellectual   and   personal   development.   Notwithstanding,   I   will   neglect  ......

Words: 3900 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Social Entrepreneurship

...Social Entrepreneurship can be explained as the act or submission of one or more persons with innovative resolutions to societies most pressing social issues. Social Entrepreneurship utilizes its resources and business surroundings to benefit the needs or wants of it social surroundings. One example that may play into social entrepreneurship is a company called “Thermpod”. A young girl, by the name of Jane Chen established this company, creating a sleeping bag-like device that warmed low-birth weight babies in hospitals and clinics. Chen’s invention not only saved lives of thousands of babies a year, but also put smiles on may faces. Another amazing social entrepreneur is Maggie Doyne, Founder of Kopila Valley Children’s Home and School. Doyne had a vision to help orphans from all over the country and provide them a home and education. Today, Kopila Valley homes and educates over 300 children from different countries such as Surkhet and Nepal. There are several services offered at Kopila Valley Children’s Home and School. For example, Kopila implemented the Safina Woman’s Association (SAWA) in Morogoro, Tanzania, which is dedicated to improving the well being of woman and children by promoting inclusive education. The Safina Woman’s Association works with their government agencies to influence policies, guidelines, and legislation concerning the wellbeing of woman and children. (Center for Education Innovations, 2014)). Doynes vision and mission goes far beyond...

Words: 807 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Social Entrepreneurship

...SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP When I was a kid, I could have been what people would now call a social entrepreneur or socialpreneur. A lot of people would have fallen into this category. To help your school or church or youth group, you may have sold chocolate bars door-to-door. People bought them, even if they didn't like chocolate; because they knew the money would go to support a worthy cause. Both the seller and purchaser are examples of social consciousness in action. Now my own children, bring home their school fundraisers from school and we too buy the over priced products, not because they are great products, but because it supports their school, a good cause. Today's socially conscious entrepreneurs, socialpreneurs, are elevating that door-to-door fund raising spirit into full time business. Some of their businesses are created specifically to put unemployed, disadvantaged and underemployed individuals to work. Some sell merchandise designating disadvantaged groups as beneficiaries of their profits. Others market goods to supplement the budgets of existing social service programs. Entrepreneurs are innovative, highly-motivated, and critical thinkers. When these attributes are combined with the drive to solve social problems, a Social Entrepreneur is born. Social entrepreneurs are defined by Ashoka those who “act as the change agents for society, seizing opportunities others miss and improving systems, inventing new......

Words: 921 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Entrepreneurship or Social

...Entrepreneurship or Social Entrepreneurship: Descriptive Study On the Perspective of De La Salle University Entrepreneurship Students Paul Lorenz T. Chua & Jose Angelo L. Calma Students, Ramon V. Del Rosario College of Business, De La Salle University March 27, 2014 Abstract Entrepreneurs have been around 1723 since then, they have been innovating, making new enterprises, and creating new job opportunities. The profession of entrepreneurs focuses more on the mainstream management approach, which revolves around materialism. On the other hand, a different kind of entrepreneurship started around 1960s and it is social entrepreneurship. Social entrepreneurship does not focus on the mainstream management approach, but focuses on the multi-stream management theory and practice. The research paper aims to find out the preference of De La Salle University (DLSU) Entrepreneurship students towards entrepreneurship or social entrepreneurship. The gathered information was conducted through a quantitative surveying of forty-two (42) DLSU Entrepreneurship students. Results showed that DLSU Entrepreneurship students are leaning more into the profession of entrepreneurship as mainly this profession has more profit and is much more viable compared to social entrepreneurship and that social entrepreneurship requires more knowledge. Keywords: entrepreneurship, social entrepreneurship, mainstream management, multi-stream management theory and practice, profession,......

Words: 4893 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Social Entrepreneurship

...What is social entrepreneurship? The animation is made to explain the concept of social entrepreneurship to the general public and raise awareness of the importance of this type of business.... Social entrepreneurship is the attempt to draw upon business techniques to find solutions to social problems.This concept may be applied to a variety of organizations with different sizes, aims, and beliefs. Conventional entrepreneurs typically measure performance in profit and return, but social entrepreneurs also take into account a positive return to society. Social entrepreneurship typically attempts to further broad social, cultural, and environmental goals is often associated with the voluntary sector. At times, profit also may be a consideration for certain companies or other social enterprises. There are continuing arguments over precisely who counts as a social entrepreneur. Thus far, there has been no consensus on the definition of social entrepreneurship, so many different sorts of fields and disciplines are associated with social entrepreneurship. Philanthropists, social activists, environmentalists, and other socially oriented practitioners are referred to as social entrepreneurs. For a clearer definition of what social entrepreneurship entails, it is necessary to set the function of social entrepreneurship apart from other socially oriented activities and identify the boundaries within which social entrepreneurs operate.[4] Some have advocated restricting the......

Words: 2381 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Social Entrepreneurship

...Social entrepreneurship is a process of combining social cause with business approach and innovations. Social entrepreneurs are individual entrepreneurs who find innovative, efficient and effective methods of serving a social purpose such as reduce unemployment, reduce pollution, toxicity and reducing the inequality between the rich and the poor. Instead of leaving social issues to government or big Corporations, social entrepreneurs find the things that are not working and solve the problem by changing the system. They create ideas and find solutions that are ethical, sustainable or user-friendly, thus convince societies to adopt these steps. Every leading social entrepreneur (Bill Gates/ Richard Bronson) are visionaries that are concerned with profit maximization but also the welfare of the public. Social entrepreneurship shapes the frontiers between the profit- oriented sectors and the non-profit oriented sectors as social enterprises can vary from for-profit community development organizations such as hybrid organizations which have both profit and non-profit elements. This is so because of the different traditions of social entrepreneurship in different parts of the world. Some examples of non-profit social enterprises are the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), BRAC (NGO) or the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and some examples of profit oriented social enterprises are the Grameen bank in Bangladesh and SELCO. A good example of a social entrepreneur is Jordan......

Words: 567 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Social Entrepreneurship

...the global topic of entrepreneurship, review entrepreneur traits and social entrepreneurship trends. Studies suggest entrepreneurs post success possess common traits, suggesting traits can be acquired. With these strong traits, entrepreneurs have the potential to produce substantial change on all levels of the triple bottom line. Profitability is equally as important to both commercial and social entrepreneurs. However, it is where they funnel their profits and their driving forces that differ. With so many social issues globally, there are a myriad of social entrepreneurship trends. However, this report focuses on community-supported agriculture, youth homelessness and support for refugee women, all of which are in need of extra support from social entrepreneurship.   Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Section 1: Overview of Entrepreneurship 2 2.1 Entrepreneurs 2 2.2 Social Entrepreneur 4 3.0 Section 2: Current Trends in Social Entrepreneurship 7 3.1 Community Supported Agriculture 7 3.2 Social Integration and Employment for Refugee Women 9 3.3 Youth Homelessness 10 4.0 Conclusion 11 5.0 References 12 1.0 Introduction The purpose of the report is to review entrepreneurship, identify the traits of an entrepreneur, and examine the factors that differentiate social and commercial entrepreneurship. Whilst entrepreneurship is considered......

Words: 2421 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Social Entrepreneurship

...The nature and effect of innovation in the scope of social entrepreneurship Duvnäs, H., Stenholm, P., Brännback, M., & Carsrud, A. L. (2012). What are the outcomes of innovativeness within social entrepreneurship? The relationship between innovative orientation and social enterprise economic performance. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 8, 1, 68. Innovation and its influence in social entrepreneurship settings are examined. The study of social entrepreneurship is a recent area of inquiry while its practice has been around for some time. The authors acknowledge the existence of innovation in an average business entrepreneurial environment; however, the question of to what degree does innovation have and its effect in a less desirable circumstance as in a social entrepreneurial environment. In the social environment, innovation has caused increase attention to be placed in these settings. The increases are attributed to two indicators, economics a matter of supply and demand and competition for funding. The research examines the theoretical, social and performances as it relates to innovation and determines how these factors connect to other aspects of entrepreneurship. This study contains historical information and a rationale for the increased interest in social entrepreneurship. Duvnäs, Stenholm, Brännback, & Carsrud (2012) acknowledge the formal customs that are normally attributed to a business environment, however, it also provides a......

Words: 800 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Social Entrepreneurship

...Brief Profile Youth School for Social Entrepreneur (YSSE) Introduction Youth School for Social Entrepreneur (YSSE) is a non-profit organization dedicated for the Youth Development through large-scale job creation and entrepreneurship development. Youth School for Social Entrepreneur (YSSE) is located In Dhaka, Bangladesh. It was established with the cooperation of British Council and The Hunger Project -Active Citizen Program in February 01, 2015. Background Youth School for Social Entrepreneur (YSSE) is active Citizen 635 batch Social Action Plan. Social Entrepreneur, as a practice and a field for scholarly investigation, provides a unique opportunity to challenge, question, and rethink concepts and assumptions from different fields of management and business research. This article puts forward a view of social entrepreneurship as a process that catalyzes social change and addresses important social needs in a way that is not dominated by direct financial benefits for the entrepreneurs and its importance in Bangladesh and the goal of Youth school for social entrepreneurs. Social entrepreneurship is seen as differing from other forms of entrepreneurship in the relatively higher priority given to promoting social value and development versus capturing economic value. Here in Bangladesh people needs to know about Entrepreneurship and YSSE can help one to be a successful entrepreneur. Goal The aims of the organization is to solve our own......

Words: 1347 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Role of Education in Social Entrepreneurship

...Asad Malik (S153F0008) Entrepreneurship education in universities The latest decades have seen a tremendous rise in entrepreneurship education at universities around the globe. The foremost pedagogical tool in many entrepreneurship programs seems to be having students learn how to write a business plan (Hills, 1988; Johannisson et al., 1998). A new study examines three new, comparatively small, but very ambitious entrepreneurship programs. All of the three programs try to increase students’ awareness of entrepreneurship as a career possibility, but also include various practical training modules. Specifically, all three programs include training session in acting and thinking creatively, using a problem-based learning approach where students develop new and creative solutions to business ideas and eventually, in some cases, actually start new ventures during the educational program. Role of education on entrepreneurial intentions Entrepreneurial intention has been described as “a conscious state of mind that directs attention toward a specific goal to achieve it” (Bird, 1989, p. 8). Researchers typically trace entrepreneurial intentions to three general factors (Krueger et al., 2000). First, intentions are triggered by a person’s attitude towards the behaviour. This is seen as the weighted sum of perceived consequences and the likelihood of different outcomes of the behaviour, including intrinsic rewards. The second factor is perceived social norms. This means that the...

Words: 371 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Social Entrepreneurship

...Paper for Cornell –PKU Conference, June 9-11, 2008, Ithaca Legal Myth on Emergence of Social Enterprises in China By JIN Jinping∗∗ Abstract Is social enterprise a new form of organization, differ from for-profit ones and not-for-profit ones? The article tries to answer this question. The social enterprises seem blur the boundary between for-profit and not-for-profit in the objects, while they don’t break though the distinction between for-profit organization and not-for-profit organization, and the rules applied respectively. However the social enterprises can enjoy some special treatment, not base on the form of organization, but on the social benefit of their mission. We should deal with social enterprises and pure business enterprises differently, and shouldn’t ask the later to offer what they needn’t. Key words: Social Enterprises; Corporate Social Responsibility; Community Interest Company; the Triple Bottom Line PartⅠ. Introduction While “corporate social responsibility” is broadly concerned by the public, a new term “Social Enterprise” has been introduced and is gaining its popularity. There are quite a few incubators for social enterprises in practice, and some foundations have put ∗∗ Jin Jinping, Lecture in Peking University Law School. Email: jinjinping@yahoo.com.cn. 1 social enterprises at their priority list of their grantee.1 The term “Social Enterprise” is first used in a report of Organization for European Economic......

Words: 4245 - Pages: 17