Transformational and Transactional Leaders in Higher Educationpdf

In: Business and Management

Submitted By haquemit
Words 5371
Pages 22
Transformational And Transactional Leaders In Higher Education
Lloyd Moman Basham Texas A&M University-Commerce Abstract This paper discusses the following issues: (1) the climate, environment, challenges, and issues in higher education; (2) an overview of leadership and its application to education; (3) transformational leadership as the current focus on concepts relating to organization leadership; (4) transactional leadership as being management by exception; and (5) a comparison of transactional and transformational leadership. Climate, Environment, Challenges, and Issues in Higher Education
The growing consensus among educators and policy-makers is that the current process of education must change dramatically. A different approach is needed to prepare today’s leaders to meet tomorrow’s challenges. The new structure should enhance preparation, allowing for innovation and futuristic thinking in a collaborative setting (Rodriguez, 1999). Americans, at all levels, have had great faith in the power of education to improve their quality of life. Education has been viewed as an escape route from poverty, an antidote to intolerance born of ignorance, a primary source of national prosperity, and the foundation of democracy (Swail, 2003). Scientific and technological advances have intensified in the past two decades and for the first time in human history created a truly global community. Modern telecommunications have linked all the corners of the planet as never before. Like the technology that helped create the emerging worldwide marketplace, the global community is in a dynamic period of change. Business communications, capital and financial services, research, and educational programs increasingly move across national borders. The pace of change will accelerate, and the urgent need for highly educated men and women who possess competence, perspective, human…...

Similar Documents

Transactional vs. Transformational Leadership

...Transactional Leadership vs. Transformational Leadership: What’s My Style? John E. Kaiser MADS 6661-82: Managing Organizational Change Fairleigh Dickinson University After researching and evaluating the differences between Transactional and Transformational Leadership styles I believe that I practice more of the Transformational style, however, there are certain situations that do necessitate the use of Transactional Leadership. As has been said time and time again by “leadership theorists”, no one style of leadership is perfect for all situations; effective leadership requires the ability to understand and practice a number of leadership styles depending on the situation. I believe that the Transformational style is more employee centered and employee enabling in that its focus is on the overall improvement and achievement of both the organization and the employee. Transformational Leadership allows for the empowerment of the employee, through his or her own focus and abilities on self improvement and growth. It allows for the employee to grow through their own motivations and desires as being a stakeholder in their own destiny within the organization. Unfortunately, the Transformational style is not for every employee, or rather, every employee may not have the self motivation for self improvement not only for themselves but also for the betterment of the organization. There are those times......

Words: 429 - Pages: 2

Transactional and Transformational Leadership

...the whole strategy. Correspondingly, any organizations cannot function without leaders. Leader is the most substantial element of successful organizations. Becoming outstanding leaders, leadership skill is vital in order to drive the organizations forward. Several leadership principles are extensively used these days. Burns (1978) identified two types of leadership comprise of transactional and transformational leadership. Hence, leaders should be capable to indicate which theory should be applied in accordance with organization’s culture and objectives. This essay aims to evaluate the resemblances and the differences between transactional and transformational leadership as well as the feasibility to utilize a mixture of them by giving the definitions and examples followed by the supporting researches and studies. Initially, transactional and transformational leadership are different in terms of implementation and its outcomes. However, transformational leadership was developed from transactional leadership (Downton, 1973). Bass (1985) defined transactional leadership as an exchange activity that leaders execute to motivate subordinates in order to achieve their tasks by giving out reward or punishment correspond with their performance. Additionally, active and passive management by exception are taken into account when it comes to misconception and faults. Bass (1985) stated that transformational leadership emphasizes the value of subordinates, encourages them to perform......

Words: 1634 - Pages: 7

Transformational Leaders

...Transformational Leadership Yukl (1989) says that transformational leadership is the process of influencing major changes in the attitudes and assumptions of the organization’s mission or objectives. Transformational leaders are change agents. They influence the mission and objectives to make way for a brighter future for the organization. Bass (1990) states that transformational leadership commonly involves the actions of leader’s influence on followers. People in these organizations follow the leader because they so desire. They are motivated to do more than is originally expected because of their feelings of trust, admiration, loyalty, and respect for the leader. They want to go the extra mile because of the deep sense of satisfaction they derive doing so. The leader motivates the subordinates by making them more aware of the importance of values of task outcomes, and by helping subordinates think beyond their own self-interest to the work team and organization, and by activating higher order needs such as creative expression and self- actualization. Transformational leaders have charisma, but this is not the only factor needed to bring about change. They sometimes go down to the trenches with their followers as they also perform the roles of coach, trainer and mentor. (Shani & Lou, 2000) Transformational leaders do not hesitate to challenge the process by searching for opportunities, experimenting and taking risks. They do not merely call for changes to be made.......

Words: 330 - Pages: 2

Workplace Change and the Impact That Transformational Leaders Have on Their Employees

...discuss and critically evaluate the prevalence and the degree of the relationship between transformational leadership and its effect on the employee’s positive self-esteem and organisational commitment. The presentation of the most important observations and insights in this report are based on the information gathered from a questionnaire. The questionnaire was administered and completed by the chosen work group of employees constituting a sample of ninety three individuals. As prior research and analysis in this field was limited to a generic employee group it was decided to further contribute to this field by investigating the differences in responses between male and female respondents. A literature review was conducted to assess and present the relationship between transformational leadership and the effect on employee’s self-esteem and organisational commitment. The impact of transformational leadership on the sample group has been assessed through statistical analyses of the extracted data (from the survey). The interaction between the following constructs were investigated: * Transformational leadership on positive self-esteem Results determined a poor correlation * Transformational leadership on organisational commitment Results found a marginal impact * Positive self-esteem on organisational commitment Results found a medium correlation * Transformational leadership on organisational commitment, with the mediating effect of positive......

Words: 5768 - Pages: 24

Transactional and Transformational Leadershio

...Transactional and Transformational Leadership in the Work Place In the following paper I will discuss what transactional and transformational leadership are. I will also provide examples of how each of these leadership styles plays a role in the workplace. James McGregor Burns first introduced the concept of transforming leadership; he established two concepts “transforming leadership and transactional leadership” (Burns, 1978). According to Burns (1978) the transforming approach creates a compelling change in the life of people and organizations. It creates a new way of perceptions and values. For employees, it changes their expectations and ambitions. Bernard M. Bass developed the concept of Burns’ work. He used the term transformational rather than transforming. He explained the personality traits that influence transforming and transactional leadership. He also added on to Burns’ work by explaining how transformational leadership could be measured and how it impacts follower motivation and performance (Bass, 1985). A commonly used survey called “the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ Form 5X)” is used to measure each component of the full range leadership. The transactional leadership style is a style which is more concerned with keeping the status quo. The transactional leaders use various incentives and power to motivate employees to perform to their best ability. These leaders tend not to see the long term in strategically guiding an organization;......

Words: 917 - Pages: 4

Difference Between Transactional and Transformaional Leader

...WHAT ARE THE PRINCIPAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN TRANSACTIONAL AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP. Every Leader has a style that is adopted based on prevailing situation and their end focus in mind. However, it is pertinent to give some basic highlights on the various differences that are inherent in their various approach. For leadership concept to be complete and fully adopted there must always be a corresponding Followership. Burns define Leadership as, “ leaders inducing followers to act for certain goals that represent the values and the motivations-the wants and needs, the aspirations and expectations-of both leaders and followers.” Leadership is all about influencing the followers to achieve a desired goal. Over the years there have been ‘generation’ theories which are Trait theory, Behavioural Theory, Contingency theories and Transformational. The 1st question that comes to mind is what Transactional Leadership is. Transactional Leader: approaches followers with an eye to exchanging one thing for another … Burns pursues a cost benefit, economic exchange to met subordinates current material and psychic needs in return for “contracted” services rendered by the subordinate …. Bass Transactional Leadership is a style of leadership that uses the bases of conditions between a leader and follower. In essence, it is a form of conditional relationship in every facet of life, superiors’ sets target to the subordinates and expects the subordinate to perform and be rewarded. In......

Words: 618 - Pages: 3

Transactional vs. Transformational Leadership

...ARCH An ARCH (autoregressive conditionally heteroscedastic) model is a model for the variance of a time series.  Given the apparent lack of any structural dynamic economic theory explaining the variation in higher order moments, particularly instrumental in this development has been the autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (ARCH) class of models introduced by Engle (1982). The ARCH model and its various extensions have proven very effective tools along these lines. In truth, by any yardstick, the literature on ARCH has expanded dramatically since the seminal paper by Engle (1982). It is hope that this overview of the extensive ARCH literature may serve as a catalyst in fostering further research in this important area. Engle, R.F. (1982) “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U.K. Inflation”, Econometrica, 50,987-1OO8. EGARCH For comparison to the TGARCH and GJR-GARCH above models, a radically different specification is used for the FIB density data. Take the place of the Generalized Error Distribution, asymmetric normal distribution is used. The same variables which are used in other models are used for this specification too. Using the different set then the comparison would have been difficult. Turbidity, rainfall, dew point, and cloud cover are significant variables. In the model specification, the skewed normal is replaced with a normal distribution making it a fixed symmetric GARCH model. The consequence of...

Words: 733 - Pages: 3

Transformational Leadership

...similar more than different. Transformational is more similar to charismatic leadership than transactional. 4.0 Introduction Great Man theories assume that the capacity for leadership is inherent that great leaders are born, not made. These theories often portray great leaders as heroic, mythic, and destined to rise to leadership when needed. The term “Great Man” was used because, at the time, leadership was thought of primarily as a male quality, especially in terms of military leadership (About, Inc., 2007). Trait theories similar in some ways to “ Great Man” theories, trait theories assumes that people inherit certain qualities and traits that make them better suited to leadership. Trait theories often identify particular personality or behavioral characteristics shared by leaders, but particular traits are key features of leadership difficulties in using trait theories to explain leadership (About, Inc., 2007). Relationship theories or Transformational theories focus upon the connections formed between leaders and followers. These leaders motivate and inspire people by helping group members see the importance and higher good of the task. Transformational leaders are focused on the performance of group members but also want each person to fulfill his or her potential. These leaders often have high ethical and moral standards (About, Inc., 2007). Management theories, also known as Transactional theories focus on the......

Words: 1325 - Pages: 6

Case Study - Comparison of Transactional and Transformational Leadership

...Comparison of Transactional and Transformational Leadership: Case Study of the Difference between William Wong (Lukfook Jewelry) and Yu-tung Cheng (Chow Tai Fook Jewelry) Leadership Styles i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2. The literature review of leadership......................................................................... 2 2.1. Transactional leadership ............................................................................... 3 2.2. Transformational leadership......................................................................... 4 3. Jewelry industry in Hong Kong................................................................................ 6 4. Leaders’ background ............................................................................................... 7 4.1. Background of William Wong ....................................................................... 7 4.2. Leadership style ............................................................................................ 8 4.3. Background of Yu-tung Cheng ...................................................................... 9 4.4. Leadership style .......................................................................................... 10 5. Comparative analysis on leadership ......................................................................

Words: 3339 - Pages: 14

Summary of Transformational Leaders

...Transformational Leadership * New leadership * Attention = Charismatic and affective elements * Change and transforms people * Connected with emotions, values, ethics, standards, and long-term goals * Incorporates charismatic and visionary leadership * Role of leadership and followership Transformations vs. Transactional Leadership Transactional = exchanges between leaders and their followers (e.g. Politician says no new taxes win votes by that) Transformational = Process whereby a person engages with others and creates a connection that raises the level of motivation and morality in both the leader and the followers Try to help followers to reach their fullest potential (e.g. Manager changes company’s corporate values to reflect a more humane standard of fairness and justice Manager and Followers stronger and higher set of moral values) Pseudo transformational Transformation in a negative way (e.g. Adolf Hitler) self-consumed, exploitive and power oriented with wrapped moral values Charisma = being dominant, having a strong desire to influence others, being self confident, and own moral values (According to house). Also Strong role models (followers should adopt). Also they communicate high expectations for followers –> also in meeting these expectations. Last but not least, followers have task-relevant motives that may include affiliation, power or esteem. One big change by Shamir,House and Arthur (1993): Charismatic......

Words: 1470 - Pages: 6

Transactional Leadership

...Discuss the reasons behind the current enthusiasm for transformational leadership and comment upon the adequacy of the theory Introduction On the threshold of the 21st century, organizational strategy highlights the importance of the effective utilization of knowledge and human resources (Ying, Ken and Ting, 2012). To compete in such circumstances with the rapid diffusion of information, organizations must improve employees’ professional skills and knowledge to maintain their competitive advantage to some degree. In this case, understanding the effectiveness of leadership is crucial. The evolution of leadership theories have generally transited from a stage that focused on personal features to the next, which is more dependent on the interaction between leaders and subordinates. Recently, leadership research has accentuated the effectiveness of transactional and transformational leadership (Tyssen, Wald and Heidenreich, 2014). Compared with transactional leadership, some scholars have argued that transformational leadership could result in a higher level of work engagement in a dynamic environment (Brief and Weiss, 2002). However, although transformational leaders could bring positive affect on employers’ behavior in several aspects and could also instigate a collaborative work environment, it is possible for employers to become over-reliant on them. In addition, it is undeniable that cultural values will have a pervasive influence on different aspects of management......

Words: 3442 - Pages: 14

Transformational Leadership

...|  Transformational Leadership: Characteristics and Criticisms   Iain Hay School of Geography, Population and Environmental ManagementFlinders University         A prime function of a leader is to keep hope alive. (John W. Gardner)Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm. (Ralph Waldo Emerson)Setting an example is not the main means of influencing another, it is the only means. (Albert Einstein) Collectively, these three short quotations capture some of the key characteristics of transformational leadership, a form of leadership argued by some (Simic, 1998) to match the Zeitgeist of the post-World War II era. Academic debate about the nature and effectiveness of transformational leadership has developed since key work on the topic emerged in the 1970s.  This short paper sets out to provide summary answers to three main questions about transformational leadership. What is it? How is it applied? What are some of its key weaknesses? In the course of the discussion, the following pages also provide a brief background to the origins of transformational leadership theory and point quickly to a possible theoretical future for a transformed transformational leadership.  Transformational Leadership TheoryAccording to Cox (2001), there are two basic categories of leadership: transactional and transformational. The distinction between transactional and transformational leadership was first made by Downton (1973, as cited in Barnett, McCormick & Conners, 2001) but the idea...

Words: 24361 - Pages: 98

Transition Towards a Transformational Leader

...requires leaders to possess the right traits such as intelligence, charisma, determination, sociability, integrity and confidence. All individuals are born with unique leadership traits, which can positively impact their leadership. Effective leadership results when the leader engages the right traits in the right place at the right time. In addition, it is vital that a leader has the capacity to lead. This capacity may be innate or developed through enhanced dedication, practice, instruction and constructive feedback from others. Leadership requires skilled leaders who have the competency to effectively accomplish tasks. Individuals who have the ability to learn from experiences and reflect on past failures and success can acquire leadership skills. Leadership is also an observable behavior. Effective leadership requires leaders to have the ability to combine task behaviour and process behaviour in an optimum way. Leadership has evolved from the traditional approach to the interactive type of leadership where authority and influence are shared among all members of the group. This approach proposes collaboration between leaders and followers to devotedly work towards achieving a common good. In order to attain synergy influence is essential to the process of leadership. In essence, effective leadership is the purposeful influence on followers that fosters positive change for the greater good. My personal philosophical approach to leadership reflects theory Y. As a leader it......

Words: 813 - Pages: 4

Transformational Versus Transactional Leadership

...TRANSFORMATIONAL VERSUS TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP LDR550Z-Leadership and Team Development-Fall 2011 Abstract This research paper addresses various aspects of transformational and transactional leadership styles. It mainly presents a comparative overview of these leadership styles. Further, it talks about an example of each transformational and transactional leadership in real-world. This leads to mentioning various applications that each leadership style finds in today’s business. Analysis of strengths and weaknesses or potential growth areas of both leadership styles is mentioned to help in better understanding of the subject. At last, the paper concludes with some discusses if knowing one’s leadership style and leadership style of your leader is important or not. Introduction In today’s volatile economy, the business is rapidly changing and getting more competitive with each passing day. Therefore, in order to survive in this market, the organizations need to continuously come out with innovative solutions. In these situations, transformational leaders play a vital role by encouraging creativity from their followers and maximizing their performance and productivity. On the other hand, transactional leaders are needed to maintain the stability and achieve goals on a regular basis. In order to analyze or compare these two styles of leadership, a brief introduction to both the styles is needed. Transformational Leader According to Bernard Bass,......

Words: 2760 - Pages: 12

Pablo Escobar: Pseudo-Transformational Leader

...Pablo Escobar: Pseudo-Transformational Leader Case #1 Prepared for Dr. Bret Bradley Prepared by Team 2: Timothy Donnelly Sande Jarrett Chase Miller MGT-3133-001 - Leadership February 14, 2012 Intro Pablo Escobar was the charismatic, ruthless leader of the Medellin drug cartel in Columbia during the 1970s and 80s (Kelly, 2005, p. 118). He possessed charisma, intelligence, and an idealized status in the eyes of his followers like a transformational leader (Minster, 2012), but he showed criminal tendencies from a young age (A&E, 2012) and displayed the poor morals and selfish manipulation of others that characterize a pseudo-transformational leader. While Escobar did have some degree of idealized influence and appeared to exert inspirational motivation, his poor morals and thirst for power compromised these aspects of his leadership and led to a lack of intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration for his followers. Because of this, Escobar, while charismatic and effective, was not a true transformational leader. Idealized Influence The idealized influence factor is a characteristic of transformational leadership where the leader’s behavior, charisma and strong moral values compel followers to strive to emulate the leader and view him as a role model (Northouse, 2010, p. 177). Individuals with poor moral values may still have high charisma and seek out leadership roles, but without the moral element cannot be......

Words: 1371 - Pages: 6