United States Court Systems Essay

In: Other Topics

Submitted By melissaheward
Words 833
Pages 4
What your about to read consists of the federal court system, federal court’s jurisdictions, and lastly I’m going to compare the federal court system to the state of Georgia’s court system. Let’s start with the federal court system, which consist of three tiers.
The Federal Courts
According to the Paralegal Professional by Henry R. Cheeseman and Thomas F. Goldman, the trial courts of the federal system is the District Courts (2011, p.211). Cheeseman and Goldman say there are 94 district courts in the federal court system (2011, p.211). Also in their 2011 book, they say the district courts are decided by geographical area and how populated that area is (Cheeseman, p.211). Lastly, Cheeseman and Goldman state that there is at least one District Court in every state (2011, p.211). Next, is the intermediate appellate court in the federal court system. The Paralegal Professional says the U.S. Court of Appeals is the intermediate appellate court in the federal court system (Cheeseman, p.211). Cheeseman and Goldman also say there are thirteen circuits, which are the geographical area that the court serves (2011, p.211). They also state that the courts can only take appeals from inside their circuit (2011, p.211). According to their 2011 book, each circuit has a three judge panel and someone in a case can request a review after the judges make their decision (Cheeseman, p.211). The last part of the federal court system is the highest court of the federal system. According to Cheeseman and Goldman, the highest court is the United States Supreme Court (2011, p.214). Cheeseman states that the President of the United States nominates nine different judges, eight of them will be associate judges and one of them the chief judge (2011, p.214). Their 2011 book says that the justices (judges) only look at the record the lower court did of the case to decide if there…...

Similar Documents

The Functions of the United States Supreme Court

...function of the Supreme Court as it is presented in Article III of the United States Constitution is saying that the government can do whatever it wants to do. With this, there is no higher court that the Supreme Court, inferior courts may from time to time establish the law. A judge may stay in his position as long as he/she behaves well. All cases heard have the quality of being fair under the Constitution and Judicial powers. All trials should be held in the state where a person lives or the state where the crime was committed. No person should be convicted of harming the government unless that there are two witnesses. What is the main function of the Supreme Court? The main function of the Supreme Court is to interpret the law in accordance to the United States Constitution in a fair way. “That court maintains balance between state and nation through the maintenance of the rights and duties of individuals.” (pg.27. Judicial Process in America 8th Edition.) When a case makes it to the Supreme Court the decision within the matter is final, there’s no overturn for it. What is meant by “original jurisdiction” and what kind of cases it hears? When we say “original jurisdiction” it means that the Supreme Court hears a case from the beginning. It will hear cases for the first time with Ambassadors, public ministers, controversies between two or more states and citizens of different states. The Supreme Court will also hear cases to review the lower court decisions.......

Words: 432 - Pages: 2

The United States Dual Court System and Its Historical Developments

...The United States Dual Court System and its Historical Developments The United States court system is divided between two administratively separate parts. The first was established in early colonial times. The original thirteen colonies had established their own individual court systems based off the English system (The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed., 2007). According to an article “Early Development of the United States Court System US Courts in the Early Republic” written by Martin Kelly “In 1789 Article Three of the US Constitution stated that "[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." (Kelly, 2012) ” This article of the US Constitution created the Federal Court System. Because each of the original colonies had an established court system, the two court systems evolved separately into today’s modern dual court system (Kelly, 2012). This essay will break down the major historical events in the United States Court system to include probation, parole, and juvenile courts and how they have transformed todays United States Dual court system. In the late 19th century and early 20th century a social movement known as Progressivism had a strong hand in creating and molding the US Court systems. This movement primary goal toward the court systems was to change the thinking from retribution to rehabilitation (Net Industries, 2012). As the......

Words: 864 - Pages: 4

Health Care Systems of Taiwan and the United States

...Health Care Systems of Taiwan and the United States Health care is one of the most essential foundations for any citizenship in any country since whether it is effective or not, it definitely affects the standard of living and the life expectancy of a country. According to Johnson and Stoskopf (2009), "A health system as described by the World Health Organization (WHO) is the sum total of all the organizations, institutions, and resources whose primary purpose is to improve health," (p. 3). Therefore, to positively improve a nation, having an effective health care system is crucial. Being recognized as one of the powerful countries in the world, the United States has a great shape of health care programs; however, sometimes it is inaccessible to some of the citizens. On the contrary, as a small country, Taiwan is famous for its health care system although there are still defective parts existing in the current system. To compare the differences of health care systems in Taiwan and the United States, we can observe the three major aspects: ownership, cost, and quality. First of all, Taiwan and the United States have different types of ownership in the health care systems. Thus, Taiwan owns a single-payer system, which is run by the government, forcing everyone to join it and pay. Because of this policy, the coverage of health care is close to 99 percent (Underwood, 2009). In this country, the government-run system covers prevention, primary care,......

Words: 942 - Pages: 4

Comparison Essay on Tax Systems in Great Britain, the United States of America and Lithuania

...Comparison essay on tax systems in Great Britain, The United States of America and Lithuania | | | | "Government does not tax to get the money it needs; government always finds a needa for the money it gets." That’s what once said Ronald Reagan about taxes and what it is collected for. Of course, it was a joke, but I may bet there are lots of people, who would agree with that thought. Sometimes they even feel that they are caught in the behemothian jaws of government. In general, tax is money that one has to pay to the government so that it can pay for public services.  Great Britain, The United States of America and Lithuania have the similar taxes. And the most known of them, in my opinion, are income tax, state social insurance contributions and VAT (value added tax). Income tax is the amount of money, which is paid by everyone earning a certain income, starting with just a few hundred dollars (pounds, litas) per year. In Lithuania like in other two countries, income tax should be paid not only by the native residents, but also by people and organizations that work in the country. In Lithuania, the tax rate is 15 per cent on income from distributed profit, interest, seamen income, income from sporting, artistic activities, royalties, income from rent or sale or any other form of transfer of property, pensions paid out of Lithuanian pension funds, life insurance payments and 33 per cent for other items, not listed above. That means, that most of Lithuanian working......

Words: 1559 - Pages: 7

The State of Oklahoma Court Systems

...In the state of Oklahoma there are several court systems. Each court has a designated portion of cases that they oversee and can either be ruled by a judge or determined by a jury trial. At the top you have two court systems, the Supreme Court in which 9 judges reside over and the Court of Criminal Appeals in which 5 judges reside. These court systems are called, “Courts of Last Resort (Oklahoma Department of Libraries, n.d.). The Supreme Court assigns cases to the Civil Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court handles a variety of cases which include, appeal by right civil, permission and exclusive original proceeding cases (Courts, 2010). The Supreme Court is also responsible for administration of the entire state’s judicial system. The Court of Criminal Appeals handles exclusive appeal by right and permission for criminal and juvenile. This court also handles exclusive death penalty cases and original proceeding application for writ. Then in the Intermediate Appellate Court, reporting to the Supreme Court you have the Court of Civil Appeals which has four divisions and twelve judges residing in three judge panels (Courts, 2010). The Court of Civil Appeals are split with two in Oklahoma City and two in Tulsa. This court system is responsible for a large portion of the appellate decisions which are passed through the Courts of Last Resort for publication (Oklahoma Department of Libraries, n.d.). Next is the Courts of General Jurisdiction, which are the 77 Oklahoma......

Words: 578 - Pages: 3

Universal Healthcare System in the United States

...I will argue for a universal healthcare system in the United States through a comparison of feminist ethics and traditional ethics. I find that the following considerations from Virginia Held’s Ethics of Care, and Kant’s view on autonomy provide a convincing argument for universal healthcare coverage. Held In Virginia Held’s Ethics of Care, she makes six distinct statements on care ethics through a feminist point of view. 1.) “Moralities built on the image of the independent, autonomous, rational individual largely overlook the reality of human dependence and the morality for which it calls.” (Camp, 2011:48) Held is describing how interdependence is primary and one is not in control of caretaking relationships. The majority of caretaking relationships are not chosen (parents and siblings) and we have a responsibility of care to these unchosen relations. We are all interdependent on each other, not autonomous. An argument relating to health care according to the view presented by Held on feminine ethics directly confirms the point that we are not autonomous beings: “Children in particular are harmed by familial stress and developmental delays from not receiving health care, both of which can lead to behavioral problems and loss of potential. When one member is uninsured or becomes ill, there is a financial burden put on the rest of the family” (http://www.amsa.org). Universal health care coverage would allow for this family burden of stress and finances to be......

Words: 2444 - Pages: 10

Law 531: Typical State Court System

...Subject: Typical State Court System (Prazen vs Shoop) A typical state court system is designed to hear and rule various legal disputes and consists of limited-jurisdiction trial court, general-jurisdiction trial court, intermediate appellate court, and a supreme court. Limited-jurisdiction trial court also referenced as inferior trial courts preside over small claims courts, municipal courts, and justice of the peace courts. General-jurisdiction trial court or courts of record require that all evidence and testimonies are recorded and saved for future review. Two divisions of court of records consist of criminal and civil courts and preside over major legal cases, such as felonies. Intermediate appellate courts, referred to as appellate courts or courts of appeal presides over cases that have been heard in courts of record and all or part of the trial records is submitted for review. The appellate court gives its decision based solely on the facts that support the evidence. The final and highest court layer is the state supreme court; in which cases must have been heard in appellate court and certain trial courts (Cheeseman, 2013). In most cases, a supreme court verdict is final. The case of Prazen vs Shoop was processed through the state court system. Joseph Prazen retired from the City of Peru’s electrical department as the superintendent at the bottom of 1998 (Illinois Court, 2014). Prazen was able to secure his pension of more than 32 years of service with...

Words: 693 - Pages: 3

State and National Court Systems

...State and National Court Systems Tom Osterdock BUSN-420 January 20, 2013 James Powell The levels of the U.S. court system are complex but fairly simple. They start at the state level which is similar to the federal levels with the Superior or trial courts first. After that they go to the Appellate courts or Courts of Appeal. From there they would go to the State Supreme Court. After that it would go to the U.S. Supreme Court if it involves Federal Law or U.S. Constitutionality, it is their choice if they want to hear the case or not, otherwise the State Supreme court is final. In the Federal Court System it is set up as the foundation to the State court hierarchy. First we have the U.S. District Courts, then the U.S. Courts of Appeal, and finally the United States Supreme Court the highest court in the country. I am located in California, in this state we have about 12.5% of the population of the United States, there are 58 Superior courts one for each county. They are located in 450 locations in the state. They hear both civil, criminal cases, family, probate, and juvenile cases. There are approximately 2,000 judges and hear 10,255,360 filings and 8,733,177 dispositions annually. The next court would be the Courts of Appeal. California has divided these courts into 6 districts. I live in Kern County which falls under the 5th District located in Fresno county and covers nine counties including Kern county. They hear the contested decisions from the Superior Court......

Words: 867 - Pages: 4

The United States Court System

...The United States Court System Dona' De Kendricks CJA 224 March 20, 2011 Christopher Bragg Abstract The U.S. Constitution creates a dual federal court system in which the power is shared between the state and the federal governments. Each of these courts systems are composed of their own courts. State courts have the highest power in general. Within the courts there are trial and appellate courts. These two are considered to work together when there are issues within cases. When a case has any issues in the trial courts it will go to the appellate court for review. The United States court system help serve justice. United States Court System In 1789 Congress convened and emerged with the Judiciary Act of 1789, setting up a judicial system composed of a Supreme Court, Appellate Courts, and Trial Courts. The Constitution created three branches of government the executive, legislative, and the judicial court. The federal court of the United States derives its name and power from Article III of the Constitution. Article III and Section 1 establishes the Supreme Court and provides Congress the power to establish lower federal courts. Congress established the Appellate Courts consist of 12 regional court of appeals and one Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit; the Trial Courts consist of 94 Court Districts, the Bankruptcy Court, the Court of International Trade, and the Court of Federal Claims.......

Words: 1421 - Pages: 6

United States Courts

...The United States courts and history and its purpose has been a strong order of justice in the nation since the first time it was established. The system was designed to allow the citizens of the United States to receive a fair criminal trial regardless of social status, gender, race, and ethnic background. The system is composed by several different elements and processes that are at times very complicated. The best way to understand how the system works is to examine the structure and function of the different courts in America. This paper will describe a court and its purpose, define the dual court system and describe the role that early legal codes, the common law, and precedent played in the development of courts. In addition it will also identify the role of courts in criminal justice today. Over time, the court systems have established a sense of regularity or systematic procedures. The court system in the United States has a federal system of government in which power is divided between a central authority and smaller local units of government. The system has a dual system of federal and state courts that are independent of one another. Each state has its own system; the authority of a court to decide a case is called its jurisdiction. The Courts have jurisdiction only within geographical boundaries. This limits a particular city court to try cases that arise outside the city limits, on the same token, courts in one state rarely have jurisdiction over events......

Words: 763 - Pages: 4

Supreme Court of the United States

...Supreme Court of the United States, In the case of the Supreme Court of the United States, Michael D. Crawford v. Washington. Michael Crawford was tried for assault and attempted murder for stabbing a man who was named, Kenneth Lee. Crawford stabbed Lee at his apartment on on August 5,1999. Police arrested petitioner later that night. Crawford claimed he had acted in self-defense when he believed Lee had picked up a weapon. Lee denied doing anything that might make Crawford believe he was trying to attack him. Michael Crawford contended that Lee had attempted to rape his wife, Sylvia. The police arrested him for the stabbing, and after giving both Michael and his wife, Sylvia, Miranda warnings, they interrogated both husband and wife twice. The statement Michael challenged under the Confrontation Clause came from a tape recorded interrogation of Sylvia. In her second interrogation, she gave a version of the fight between Michael and the alleged victim that at least appeared inconsistent with her husband’s self-defense claim. Sylvia’s tape recorded statement was introduced at trial against Michael even though he had no opportunity for cross examination. In reviewing the statement’s admission by the trial court, the Washington Court of Appeals and Washington Supreme Court applied slightly different tests grounded in the framework described......

Words: 3781 - Pages: 16

Differences Between the State and Federal Court System

...DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURT SYSTEMS 2 Differences Between the State and Federal Court Systems Both the state government and federal government have their own separate court systems. They select their judges differently, hear different types of cases, and are structured a bit differently as well. The states use different types of ways to select their judges for their courts. In some states, voters get to vote for their judges during elections. In other states, the governor appoints their judges. Each state indicates the number of years that the judges will serve. In the case for federal judges, they are elected differently. The President of the United States nominates the judges and then the Senate confirms each nomination. Typically, federal judges hold office for lifetime, unless they are impeached. Judges can be impeached for misconduct and have to go through Congressional impeachment proceedings. Different types of cases are heard in state and federal courts. In the state courts, typically, criminal cases, contract cases, family matters, etc. are heard. In the federal courts, cases that are heard are those that involve violation of laws of the United States, public ministers, bankruptcy, disputes between two different states, etc. Depending on each case, the case will be heard upon the state court or the federal courts. This is due to the different laws each state has. For example, Illinois’ laws are different from...

Words: 580 - Pages: 3

Poli 3001 Essay. China and the United States.

...Poli 3001 Essay. China and the United States. The relations involving China and the United States are a ardent subject matter in the humankind as China, whizz and moreover(a) of the worlds oldest refinements with the largest inhabitants, and the US on the other hand, one of the worlds youngest civilizations with the strongest financial system, are not only vital for the two countries just now also for the future suppuration of the whole world. One of the main reasons for the complexity and the disagreement surrounded by China and the US relations is the inequality of the common conflicting political approach. The ideological inconsistency additionally explains why the US has constantly taken China as its opponent alternatively than an associate. This essay will discuss on the different types of organisation systems and political ideologies that China and the US are practicing. The births of the US civilization lie in a mixture of liberalism and individualism but it slowly further defined by its freedom, civil rights and body politic standards. Dissonant voices are commonly heard in the US due to its inconsistency and disorganized attitude towards its political system, which is inconceivable and approximately not possible in China. In the US, libertarianism is almost popular and researchers show that one out of five Americans behave libertarian views. Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time......

Words: 348 - Pages: 2

Measuring the United States Healthcare System

...Running head: MEASURING THE U.S. HEALTHCARE SYSTEM  1        Measuring The United States Healthcare System  Luc John Arnaud  HCM 550 ­ Quality and Performance Improvement in Healthcare  Colorado State University ­ Global Campus  Dr. Gloria Wilson  March 27, 2016                        MEASURING THE U.S. HEALTHCARE SYSTEM2    The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is based  in Paris, France, and it is essentially an assembly that comprises over thirty members  (countries) who work with each other and who all share common commitments to  democratic states and market economies. The goal of the OECD is to promote and  improve economic growth, prosperity, sustainable growth, and expansion of each nation  (OECD ­ United States Mission, n.d.). The OECD “tracks and reports annually on more  than 1,200 health system measures across 30 industrialized countries, ranging from  population health status and non­medical determinants of health to health care resources  and utilization” (Anderson, F., Squires, D., 2010, para 1). The article titled ​ Issues in  International Health Policy ​ clearly exposed the fact that the United States of America  fundamentally lacks behind the majority of other developed nations as it’s related to the  efficiency, effectiveness, and solvency of its overall healthcare system industry. The facts  and data within the article come from an analysis of health data from 2006 from the  OECD, ...

Words: 1421 - Pages: 6

United States Tax Court Opinion 2009-144

...UNITED STATES TAX COURT Opinion 2009-144 JANELLO S. DUNGCA AND MARIA C. GUTIERREZ, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 17802-08S. Filed September 17, 2009. Janello S. Dungca and Maria C. Gutierrez, pro sese. Matthew D. Carlson, for respondent. Introduction This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed. The respondent determined a $33,091 income tax deficiency and a $6,618 section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty for the petitioners’ 2005 tax year. Issues presented for consideration are: (1) Whether petitioners are entitled to deduct gambling losses; and (2) whether petitioners are liable for a section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty. Background During 2005, petitioner Janello S. Dungca (Mr. Dungca) was employed by a consulting company in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. His consulting assignment from January 1 through July 30, 2005, was at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Approximately every other weekend during that period, the petitioners visited a gambling establishment named Canterbury Park that offered wagering on horse racing. Mr. Dungca was an inveterate gambler, and since 1991 he had spent a good amount of his nonworking time gambling. Mr. Dungca would retain betting slips, receipts, and records of cash withdrawals, and at the end of each day he would record the day’s bets, winnings, and cash withdrawals (cash in and out)...

Words: 1190 - Pages: 5