What Is Power

In: Social Issues

Submitted By cn282
Words 1375
Pages 6
What is power?
Abstract
The aim of the assessment is to discover what power is. First part of the assessment is going to analyse three dimensions of power and different political theories: Pluralism, Elitism and Marxism. Later on the assessment is going to talk about different forms of state power which are: use of force, authoritative leadership, use of nudge and surveillance. The last part of the assessment is going to criticise the three dimensions of power by using market liberals’ opinion that the state in fact should hold less power and give more of the power to the individuals by privatising public sector. The conclusion states that there is no exact definition of power and that it can be defined in different ways according to pluralists, elitists or Marxists.

Introduction
The beginning of the assessment is going to explain three dimensions of power and different political theories that associate with these dimensions, these are: pluralism, elitism and Marxism. Later on it will talk about different forms of state power.

Explanation The first dimension of power is behaviourism according to Robert Dahl’s famous definition of power is: ‘’A has power over B to the extent that he can get B to do something that B would not otherwise do’’ which means that according to behaviourist philosophes in order to find out where power is we need to study different individuals behaviour. First dimension of power is pluralism. One of the pluralist observes was Robert Dahl who decided to monitor behaviour of city actors in New Heaven, Connecticut. Dahl wanted to abolish the myth that it is the business leaders that hold all the power in Atlanta. Dahl findings stated that access to states resources was spread throughout the society (different pressure groups) in other words it was non-cumulative, in addition Dahl findings stated that the power was dispersed through…...

Similar Documents

What Business and Social Problems Does Data Center Power Consumption Cause?

.... What business and social problems does data center power consumption cause? Data center power consumption economically affects businesses and environmentally affects society. Operating costs for data centers is very expensive. In the article, "Ubiquitous Green Computing Techniques for High Demand Applications in Smart Environments," the total operating costs, concerning electricity, of all data centers within the U.S. alone exceeded 7 billion dollars in 2010 (Ayala, J., Moya, J., Risco-Martín, J., Sanchez, C., Zapater, M. 2012). The article then explains that data centers consumed 61 billion kilowatt-hours in 2006;the Environmental Protection Agency provided this statistic to the US Congress in a report from 2007 (Ayala, J., Moya, J., Risco-Martín, J., Sanchez, C., Zapater, M. 2012). With this amount of energy being consumed by data centers, it is a cause for concern; consequently, data centers have an impact on the cost of business and negatively impact the environment via carbon footprint. As the carbon footprint grows, there is a need to realign the way businesses looks at managing their data centers. Several companies including Cisco, Dell, Google, HP, IBM, and Intel have announced efforts to reduce the environmental footprint of their product offerings (Chang et al., 2012). Large technology companies are starting to understand that being environmentally friendly is good for the wallet and good public relations. Understanding how to manage and build better data......

Words: 4296 - Pages: 18

What Are the Sources and Limits of Mnc Power

...What are the sources and limits of MNC power? Multinational Corporations in a Global Economy IR 120 - 201136597 - Catharina Knobloch 1. Introduction As MNCs are getting increasingly important as actors in political bargaining, the purpose of this essay is to provide a (more or less) detailed overview over the sources and limits of the power of multinational corporations (MNCs). In the first section, I am going to lead into this topic by giving some definitions. In addition to that, I am also going to explain the role of MNCs in the international governance based on the typology of regime types. Then I am going to examine the most important sources and forms of business power, before taking into account the limits and the vulnerability of MNC power. 2. Definitions First, the term of the “multinational corporation” is difficult to be generalised due to extensive variations among the current examples (corporations are of different size, age, nationality industry, pursuing distinct decision-making processes and strategy-setting patterns, etc.) In order to define it more precisely, a multinational corporation is a firm, which owns assets and controls activities in different countries. As a consequence, the corporation needs at least one subsidiary in a non-domestic country to be classified as an MNC (just foreign trade is not sufficient). Some examples of these include Shell, General Motors, IBM or BP that operates in more than 100 countries. There are four......

Words: 1615 - Pages: 7

To What Extent Are the Two Chamber of Congress Equal in Power?

...To what extent are the two chamber of congress equal in power? The two chambers do have some concurrent powers. Concurrent powers are those that are held by both chambers of congress. The two houses are equal in the passage of legislation. All bills must pass through all stages in both houses; neither house can override the wishes of the other. Both must agree the same version of the bill before that bill can be sent to the president for his signature. Both houses must vote by a two-thirds majority to override a president’s veto of a bill. In 2007, congress overrode president bush’s veto of the Water Resources Development Bill. The vote in the House was 381-40 and the vote in the senate was 81-12. The two houses are also equal in power when it comes to initiating constitutional amendments, an amendment must be approved by a two thirds majority in both houses before it can be sent to the states for their ratification. Both houses must concur in a declaration of war. This has occurred on only 5 occasions, the last one being in 1941, when America declared war on Japan in the Second World War. Lastly the 25th amendment gave to both houses the power to confirm a newly appointed vice president, this has occurred in 1973 and in 1974. Furthermore when the republicans take control of the senate in January 2015, both houses will be controlled by the republicans, meaning the differences in houses will be less relevant, as agreement between both houses will be much easier. It is also...

Words: 826 - Pages: 4

To What Extent Does Parliament Control Executive Power?

...To what extent does parliament control executive power? Executive power is seen as the exclusive body or group of influential and powerful individuals within the government in power. They hold a substantial amount of authority and responsibility and have the ability to enforce legislation, formulate government policies and govern general maintenance. Alongside the PM, the cabinet and all the ministers form an alliance together to form this excusive body of executive power. The Parliament consists of the House of Lords and House of Commons -which include various party representatives. Lord Hailsham stated that the UK has an “elective dictatorship” implying that executive is able to dominate the legislature. It could be argued that parliament does control executive power because parliament has scrutiny features such as Prime Minister's Questions, Ministerial question time and select committees, which all make the government and its executive powers accountable for their decision making. However to some extent it could be argued that parliament does not control executive power effectively, due to the fact that the government naturally has an in built majority within the House of Commons, as well as that the whipping system and the ideology of ‘toeing the party line’ results in the executive powers having the ability to gain a majority of support from the House of Commons. Furthermore the increase in prime-ministerial or even ‘presidential’ government in the UK, with the leader......

Words: 250 - Pages: 1

What Is Power

...  I  feel  the  power  that   the  8-­‐cylinder  engine  gives  me  loosening  its  550bhp.  In  this  sense,  power  is  what   Angelina  described:  force  x  velocity.   When  I  give  a  persuasive  speech  and  engage  my  audience,  I  feel  the  energy  that   this  accomplishment  gives  me.  In  this  sense,  power  is  the  emotional  feeling:   adrenaline.       But  what  can  you  do  with  power?     Power  gives  you  control,  you  can  influence  others,  it  enhances  your  authority,   the  one  with  the  greatest  power  commands,  who  has  the  power  rules…     Power  is  an  asset,   and  when  not  well  deployed,  it  can  be  a  fairly  dangerous  and  powerful  asset.     My  classmates  explained  above  definitions  of  power  in  a  variety  of  ways.  To  link   power  with  the  Business  and  Society  course,  I  would  like  to  demonstrate  that  the   perception  of  power  can  be  derived  from  four  different  perspectives  in  society:       1.  The  power  a  business  can ...

Words: 689 - Pages: 3

To What Extent Can Nazism in Power Be Seen as Totalitarianism in the Period 1933-1939?

...encapsulating a monolithic party led by an omnipotent, almost God-like figurehead. Whilst Hitler, supported by the Fuhrer myth, certainly fits the totalitarian leader definition, the Nazi Party structure contradicts the characteristics of a coordinated central party. Within, power rested on individuals and not in party structure; leading to increasingly fragmented party policy and intensifying interpersonal frictions as individuals radicalised in attempts to please the Fuhrer. In this structure, accountable and rational decision making in the long term became impossible; leaders lost any sense of stability and improvised agencies and policies to enact the amorphous will of the leader. The most radical policy of all, the extermination of the Jews, arose as the outcome of this structure as the internally competitive dynamics generated more and more radical and ultimately self destructive policies. The "institutional anarchy" of the regime, in diametric opposition to Stalinism and more conventional forms of totalitarianism, resulted in it becoming "increasingly divorced from reality in the process of decision-making" according to structuralist Hans Mommsen. He further attributes the reason of why the Nazis stayed in power was the fact that the average German either was caught up with the regime and its charismatic leader or were indifferent. As such, the party’s lack of a cohesive structure does not align with Friedrich’s model and therefore precludes the notion that the Nazi......

Words: 1019 - Pages: 5

To What Extent Did the Constitution Ensure the Kaisers Power Was Preserved?

...To what extent did the constitution ensure the Kaisers power was preserved? To a large extent the Kaiser had all power over Germany and with the desire for changes in the way Germany was run, it resulted in the improvements such as the creation of a constitution which was without a doubt crucial to the consolidation of the Kaisers position. The constitution consisted of 25 federal states, within this there were 4 kingdoms, 12 Duchies, 6 Grand Duchies and 3 free cities. At first the Kaiser had pretty much entire control over all of these states, however each one did have a government which could decide on a healthcare system, education and justice policies. The states were at this point happy with this situation, so on the whole they were content to remain part of Germany. The Kaiser had autocratic control over diplomatic policy and this meant he could even dismiss his own chancellor. He could control the entire political system of Germany as he could select people who agreed with his policies. He also made a rule that in order to rule the Kaiser must be a Prussian, ensuring his control over the German people. His rule also meant he could change the constitution so that these rules had to stay in place. The control of these factors played a big role in keeping his position a stable one. The chancellor was the chief minister of the Reich, the only person who controlled him was the Kaiser with his ability to dismiss state secretaries and anyone else who he didn’t like. He...

Words: 951 - Pages: 4

To What Extent Does Parliament Effectively Control Government Power?

...Government is, in theory, accountable to Parliament, however it is difficult for this to be the case when government makes up a large part of Parliament. So when examining how effective Parliament is at controlling the power of the executive, all of the below has to be considered. The role of select committees and departmental select committees are very important in the control of government’s power. These committees scrutinize government policy, as well as raising public awareness of it, in great detail. The line of questioning is very different, and considerably more in depth, than if the queries were raised in the House of Commons; this is because evidence is gathered in advance and the committees demand answers with substance, opposed to filibustering or rhetoric. Evidence has shown that 40% of committee recommendations to government has then been applied to policy. However, it is not so much that the recommendations are a control of the executive, but the fear the committees induce in the government; the government knows that, if they make a policy that is not in the public’s interest, they will be exposed. That being said, in a legal sense, select committees have no control or power over government, which could be argued makes them ‘watchdogs without teeth’. The committees are also, in part, made up of MPs belonging to the governing party and may not want to scrutinize their party as it may be damaging to their career prospects. The House of Lords cannot block......

Words: 833 - Pages: 4

To What Extent Is the Usa's Dominance Being Threatened by the Emerging Power of the Brics? (15)

...To what extent is the USA's dominance being threatened by the emerging power of the BRICS? (15) The USA has a notable dominance over the rest of the world due to having strengths in four main areas: economic strength, military strength, cultural influence and political power. However, the emerging BRIC nations are threatening the USA’s dominance because their strength in these areas is also looking strong. In terms of its economy, the USA is strongly threatened by China. China has the second highest GDP in the world behind the USA (6,807.43 USD in 2013) and this figure is growing at a much faster rate than the USA’s. China’s manufacturing industry is huge and exports many products all over the world. Although the average quality of life in China isn’t as good as the USA’s, it improving due to China’s growing economy allowing more investment in services like healthcare and education. A wealthier population in China may also lead to future political change and even more economic growth. Also, India’s economy is powerful and growing, although not on the scale of China. Overall, I think China will soon become more of a dominant nation compared to the USA. However, China’s GDP and quality of life won’t match the USA for a long time. The military strength of countries is important in making them superpowers. Although the USA has the strongest military force in the world, China also has very strong military strength and is most likely here to threaten the USA for global dominance...

Words: 814 - Pages: 4

To What Extent Are the Two Chambers of Congress Equal in Power and Influence?

...Generally the Senate is viewed as the more influential and prestigious body. A primary reason for this is its greater exclusive powers. In particular, the Senate has the sole power to ratify treaties, with a 2/3 majority required. For example this power was used in 2010 to ratify the New Start Treaty, passing in a 71-26 majority. In essence, the Senates role in foreign policy is far more extensive. Another of the Senate’s exclusive powers is to ratify the president’s nominations and this manifests perhaps most importantly regarding the Supeme Court. Not only can they vote against a nomination e.g when Robert Bork, the conservative justice nomination by Reagan in 1987 was voted against by 58-42 but also the mere threat of a veto severely affects who the president will even consider putting forward. For example Obama could now theoretically put forward a very liberal Supreme Court justice however he knows it would eb a wasten of time given the Republican majority in the Senate. However it should be remembered that the House too has its own exclusive powers such as in itiating money bills and the power of impeachement. Moreover, in terms of individual factors the Senate clearly appears more presitigous and influential. Firstly, there are just 100 senators compared to 435 members of the House which automatically gives indivisuals a greater infleucne. Equally, Senate terms are 6 years compared to 2 in the House, so Senators can focus on their actual job and getting things done......

Words: 432 - Pages: 2

Power

...n one of the few in-depth treatments of power in conflict situations, Hubert M. Blalock begins by acknowledging something most of us know but rarely state: "The concept of power is both exceedingly slippery to pin down and yet indispensable in enabling one to analyze...."[1] Having defined power, as in physics, as having both potential and kinetic forms, he opts for the latter usage alone in his text. That is, he acknowledges power as both the capacity of an individual or group to accomplish something, and the actual doing of something, but he limits his discussion to "actions actually accomplished." Additional insights into understanding power are offered by Beyond Intractability project participants. This has two advantages. First, it dovetails with how most of us think about power most of the time. Second, it is easier to quantify. It is much easier to measure something that has occurred than something that is a possibility. An actual occurrence is a fact that can be checked. There may be disagreement on the sources of its occurrence, but the argument about its occurrence is likely to be short-lived if adequate facts can be brought to bear. If one side has won in a disagreement (in that it has gotten the other to do something it wanted), we have prima facie evidence that the first is more powerful -- or at least has exerted more power -- than the second. Since concerns of relative power are important in conflicts, it is helpful to have a clear picture of who......

Words: 2563 - Pages: 11

What Are the Main Sources of Prime Ministerial Power - Exemplar

...What are the main sources of Prime Ministerial power? The Prime Minister enjoys certain privileges and powers that the rest of the executive. The Prime Minister is the most important figure in the UK political system, there is debate to the extent of he or she’s power; the PM draws power from a number of sources. The extent to which these powers are harnessed and used is dependent upon a number of factor, but in reality the PM can gather an incredible amount of power from the traditions, conventions and laws which regulate the post of Prime Minister. The post is seen as providing “National Leadership” and is therefore the pre-eminent position in UK politics. The Prime Minister is first and foremost an MP. This affords them legitimate power to act as they see fit on behalf of the electorate. Moreover, they have also been democratically elected within their own party, therefore they have a mandate to rule. The principle job and source of power for the PM is to set up a government. Ratified by the Queen this gives the PM the power of patronage. They can hire and fire; this gives them control and power over the careers of party members and peers. As a result party member and ministers want to impress the PM and often agree with his or her policies. Much of the PM’s power comes from being able to “hire and fire”. Although this does come with constraints; firing members of the cabinet can cause tensions within the party. However, substantial reshuffles have secures a PM’s......

Words: 706 - Pages: 3

Banking Management - Does Rbi Have the Power to Control or Influence Directly or Indirectly the Interest Rates of Banks in India and If so, in What Manner and to What Extent

...Account holder X draws a cheque for Rs. 5,000 favouring Rajesh ( a minor aged 13 years ) or, bearer. Rajesh presents the cheque on counter duly signed on the back. What should the banker, do with the cheque of a minor? (a) reafuse, since no contractual capacity (b) pay the cheque after inquiring with X (c) pay to Rajesh without any responsibility of bank (d) ask Rajesh to bring his parents (e) Section 26 N.I. Act, 1881, does not allow minor to receive payment Q.2) payment in `due course` means? a) on the due date b) in accordance with apparent signature and specimen c) in accordance with apparent tenor d) due to sufficient funds Q.3) One of the following statements in not true in the right of set-off? a) set-off means partial or total merging of a claim of one person against another in a counter claim of the latter against the former. b) Both debts must be for certain sum. c) A debt accruing due cannot be set-off. d) A banker can set-off the credit balance in the guarantor’s account before the liability of the, guarantor to the bank is determined. Q.4) Does RBI have the power to control or influence directly or indirectly the interest rates of banks in India and if so, in what manner and to what extent? Q.5) `Overseas Depository Bank` means? a) a bank authorized by the issuing company to issue Global Depository receipts......

Words: 1998 - Pages: 8

General Management - What Are the Sources and Uses of Power at Cin – Made

...Questions: 1. Who are the stakeholders in this case? 2. Which stakeholders are most important? 3. What are the critical trends in Tri – State’s environment? 4. Why do you think Tri – State’s customers are so upset? 5. What should John Godwin do? CASE NO. 2: FRESH IDEAS AT FRESH FIELDS Fresh Fields may be a supermarket, but what it’s super at selling is its image : “Good for you foods.” A New Age grocery store - ‘Fresh Fields’ falls somewhere between a health food store and a traditional supermarket. It is not merely a health food store, because it carries a wider variety of foods including fresh pasta, baked goods, sea-food and deli selections. What distinguishes Fresh Fields from supermarkets lies in what is absent from the shelves, rather than what is present, for Fresh Fields shoppers will not find foods containing lots of preservatives and artificial flavorings, such as Jell – O and Oreos, that they can purchase at other supermarkets. What Fresh Fields offers is “ organic and conventional produce, meats, seafood, dairy products, baked goods from an in – store bakery, deli items gourmet and vegetarian prepared foods, a wide array of cheese, a full grocery department, an extensive selection of supplements, skin enriching cosmetics and natural health care products and environmentally friendly household goods.” Questions: 1. What economic and social factors should Fresh Fields managers watch? 2. Suppose you manage a local......

Words: 963 - Pages: 4

Is the Power of Persuasion the Only Real Power a President Possesses? What Are the Powers Available to the President?

...Is the power of persuasion the only real power a President possesses? What are the powers available to the President? It can be argued that the power of persuasion is the only truly effective way of reaching decisions within Congress that favour the president, whilst avoiding the gridlock that the separation of powers can cause. Despite the president have a set of constitutional derived powers which he cause use to come to decisions, it can be said that this is no longer enough in the modern day and that the president’s ability to negotiate is now a indispensible skill. Along with the growth of the federal bureaucracy and the Executive Office of the President, the power of persuasion has come more into play. The president can now utilise his staff to negotiate and come to decisions which favour the president and his respective party without having to use any of his definite powers himself. The president now exploits his vice-president to a greater extent. After the passing of the 25th Amendment to the Constitution and the Eisenhower presidency in 1953, when his vice-president Nixon was given more high profile tasks, the vice-president became a significant presidential adviser. Also, for example, President Bush’s vice president, Dick Cheney, with his experience brought connections with Congress which proved important in advancing the Bush legislative agenda. However, despite this bringing the ability to pass the presidents legislation more easily, it does not......

Words: 970 - Pages: 4